Literature DB >> 30134701

Reservoir pH replica exchange.

Ana Damjanovic1, Benjamin T Miller2, Asim Okur2, Bernard R Brooks2.   

Abstract

We present the reservoir pH replica exchange (R-pH-REM) method for constant pH simulations. The R-pH-REM method consists of a two-step procedure; the first step involves generation of one or more reservoirs of conformations. Each reservoir is obtained from a standard or enhanced molecular dynamics simulation with a constrained (fixed) protonation state. In the second step, fixed charge constraints are relaxed, as the structures from one or more reservoirs are periodically injected into a constant pH or a pH-replica exchange (pH-REM) simulation. The benefit of this two-step process is that the computationally intensive part of conformational search can be decoupled from constant pH simulations, and various techniques for enhanced conformational sampling can be applied without the need to integrate such techniques into the pH-REM framework. Simulations on blocked Lys, KK, and KAAE peptides were used to demonstrate an agreement between pH-REM and R-pH-REM simulations. While the reservoir simulations are not needed for these small test systems, the real need arises in cases when ionizable molecules can sample two or more conformations separated by a large energy barrier, such that adequate sampling is not achieved on a time scale of standard constant pH simulations. Such problems might be encountered in protein systems that exploit conformational transitions for function. A hypothetical case is studied, a small molecule with a large torsional barrier; while results of pH-REM simulations depend on the starting structure, R-pH-REM calculations on this model system are in excellent agreement with a theoretical model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30134701      PMCID: PMC6005788          DOI: 10.1063/1.5027413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  74 in total

1.  Structural changes linked to proton translocation by subunit c of the ATP synthase.

Authors:  V K Rastogi; M E Girvin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Improving Convergence of Replica-Exchange Simulations through Coupling to a High-Temperature Structure Reservoir.

Authors:  Asim Okur; Daniel R Roe; Guanglei Cui; Viktor Hornak; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Molecular simulation with variable protonation states at constant pH.

Authors:  Harry A Stern
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Automation of the CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF) II: assignment of bonded parameters and partial atomic charges.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Prabhu Raman; A D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Constant pH molecular dynamics with proton tautomerism.

Authors:  Jana Khandogin; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Structural reorganization triggered by charging of Lys residues in the hydrophobic interior of a protein.

Authors:  Michael S Chimenti; Victor S Khangulov; Aaron C Robinson; Annie Heroux; Ananya Majumdar; Jamie L Schlessman; Bertrand García-Moreno
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Experimental pK(a) values of buried residues: analysis with continuum methods and role of water penetration.

Authors:  Carolyn A Fitch; Daniel A Karp; Kelly K Lee; Wesley E Stites; Eaton E Lattman; Bertrand García-Moreno E
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Charges in the hydrophobic interior of proteins.

Authors:  Daniel G Isom; Carlos A Castañeda; Brian R Cannon; Priya D Velu; Bertrand García-Moreno E
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Interpretation of pH-activity profiles for acid-base catalysis from molecular simulations.

Authors:  Thakshila Dissanayake; Jason M Swails; Michael E Harris; Adrian E Roitberg; Darrin M York
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Constant pH Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics in Explicit Solvent Using Discrete Protonation States: Implementation, Testing, and Validation.

Authors:  Jason M Swails; Darrin M York; Adrian E Roitberg
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  7 in total

1.  Exploring Protocols to Build Reservoirs to Accelerate Temperature Replica Exchange MD Simulations.

Authors:  Koushik Kasavajhala; Kenneth Lam; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Standard state free energies, not pKas, are ideal for describing small molecule protonation and tautomeric states.

Authors:  M R Gunner; Taichi Murakami; Ariën S Rustenburg; Mehtap Işık; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Characterizing Protein Protonation Microstates Using Monte Carlo Sampling.

Authors:  Umesh Khaniya; Junjun Mao; Rongmei Judy Wei; M R Gunner
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Poor Person's pH Simulation of Membrane Proteins.

Authors:  Chitrak Gupta; Umesh Khaniya; John W Vant; Mrinal Shekhar; Junjun Mao; M R Gunner; Abhishek Singharoy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  Determinants of conductance of a bacterial voltage-gated sodium channel.

Authors:  Ada Y Chen; Bernard R Brooks; Ana Damjanovic
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.699

6.  Best Practices in Constant pH MD Simulations: Accuracy and Sampling.

Authors:  Pavel Buslaev; Noora Aho; Anton Jansen; Paul Bauer; Berk Hess; Gerrit Groenhof
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 6.578

7.  Scalable Constant pH Molecular Dynamics in GROMACS.

Authors:  Noora Aho; Pavel Buslaev; Anton Jansen; Paul Bauer; Gerrit Groenhof; Berk Hess
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 6.578

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.