| Literature DB >> 30134617 |
Dennis Wörtge1, Jochen Moll2, Viktor Krozer3, Babak Bazrafshan4, Frank Hübner5, Clara Park6, Thomas J Vogl7.
Abstract
Hemispherical and cylindrical antenna arrays are widely used in radar-based and tomography-based microwave breast imaging systems. Based on the dielectric contrast between healthy and malignant tissue, a three-dimensional image could be formed to locate the tumor. However, conventional X-ray mammography as the golden standard in breast cancer screening produces two-dimensional breast images so that a comparison between the 3D microwave image and the 2D mammogram could be difficult. In this paper, we present the design and realisation of a UWB breast imaging prototype for the frequency band from 1 to 9 GHz. We present a refined system design in light of the clinical usage by means of a planar scanning and compare microwave images with those obtained by X-ray mammography. Microwave transmission measurements were processed to create a two-dimensional image of the breast that can be compared directly with a two-dimensional mammogram. Preliminary results from a patient study are presented and discussed showing the ability of the proposed system to locate the tumor.Entities:
Keywords: UWB diagnostics; microwave breast imaging; patient study
Year: 2018 PMID: 30134617 PMCID: PMC6164229 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics8030054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Figure 1(a) Experimental setup, after [21]; (b) spring-based mechanism for vertical adjustment of the top antenna to provide a good mechanical coupling even in the case of variable breast sizes and shapes.
Figure 2Comparison between X-ray image and microwave image for patient A (a,b) and patient B (c,d). The RMS was normalized by the maximum RMS of the scanned region of the present patient. The lowest intensity values occur in the area of the tumor location given by stronger attenuation of cancerous tissue. The final thickness of the compressed breast during microwave examination is very similar for patients A and B, i.e., 4.4 cm for patient A and 4.3 cm for patient B. During X-ray examination, the breast was slightly more compressed, i.e., 4.1 cm for patient A and 3.7 cm for patient B.
Figure 3Comparison of UWB radar signals measured at two different positions on the breast as illustrated in Figure 2b. It can be observed that a difference in time of arrival and signal amplitude occurs. Attenuation and time delay are much higher for the tumor location given by a higher conductivity of the malignant tissue and a higher relative permittivity (i.e., smaller wave speed). The time-domain gatings are illustrated that show the signal regions used for RMS computation.