Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 MARIA M4: clinical evaluation of a prototype ultrawideband radar scanner for breast cancer detection.

Literature DB >> 27446970

MARIA M4: clinical evaluation of a prototype ultrawideband radar scanner for breast cancer detection.

Alan W Preece¹, Ian Craddock², Mike Shere³, Lyn Jones³, Helen L Winton⁴.

Abstract

A microwave imaging system has been developed as a clinical diagnostic tool operating in the 3- to 8-GHz region using multistatic data collection. A total of 86 patients recruited from a symptomatic breast care clinic were scanned with a prototype design. The resultant three-dimensional images have been compared "blind" with available ultrasound and mammogram images to determine the detection rate. Images show the location of the strongest signal, and this corresponded in both older and younger women, with sensitivity of [Formula: see text], which was found to be maintained in dense breasts. The pathway from clinical prototype to clinical evaluation is outlined.

Entities: Disease Species

Keywords: MARIA; breast cancer; clinical evaluation; imaging; multistatic radar; ultrawideband

Year: 2016 PMID： 27446970 PMCID： PMC4951628 DOI： 10.1117/1.JMI.3.3.033502

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) ISSN： 2329-4302

30 in total

1. A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeries.

Authors: Mariya Lazebnik; Dijana Popovic; Leah McCartney; Cynthia B Watkins; Mary J Lindstrom; Josephine Harter; Sarah Sewall; Travis Ogilvie; Anthony Magliocco; Tara M Breslin; Walley Temple; Daphne Mew; John H Booske; Michal Okoniewski; Susan C Hagness
Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 3.609

2. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues.

Authors: S Gabriel; R W Lau; C Gabriel
Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer.

Authors: Norman F Boyd; Johanna M Rommens; Kelly Vogt; Vivian Lee; John L Hopper; Martin J Yaffe; Andrew D Paterson
Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 41.316

4. Cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Andrea Thomas; Taylor Murray; Michael Thun
Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 508.702

5. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors: Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-09-16 Impact factor: 91.245

6. Comparison of Screened and Nonscreened Breast Cancer Patients in Relation to Age: A 2-Institution Study.

Authors: Israel Barco; Carol Chabrera; Marc García Font; Nuria Gimenez; Manel Fraile; Josep María Lain; Merce Piqueras; M Carmen Vidal; Merce Torras; Sonia González; Antoni Pessarrodona; Josep Barco; Jordi Cassadó; Antonio García Fernández
Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 3.225

7. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study.

Authors: Freddie Bray; Ahmedin Jemal; Nathan Grey; Jacques Ferlay; David Forman
Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 41.316

8. Direct Extraction of Tumor Response Based on Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition for Image Reconstruction of Early Breast Cancer Detection by UWB.

Authors: Qinwei Li; Xia Xiao; Liang Wang; Hang Song; Hayato Kono; Peifang Liu; Hong Lu; Takamaro Kikkawa
Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 3.833

Review 9. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation.

Authors: C Robertson; S K Arcot Ragupathy; C Boachie; J M Dixon; C Fraser; R Hernández; S Heys; W Jack; G R Kerr; G Lawrence; G MacLennan; A Maxwell; J McGregor; G Mowatt; S Pinder; L Ternent; R E Thomas; L Vale; R Wilson; S Zhu; F J Gilbert
Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.014

Review 10. Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women's information.

Authors: Ritse M Mann; Corinne Balleyguier; Pascal A Baltzer; Ulrich Bick; Catherine Colin; Eleanor Cornford; Andrew Evans; Eva Fallenberg; Gabor Forrai; Michael H Fuchsjäger; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas H Helbich; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Julia Camps-Herrero; Christiane K Kuhl; Laura Martincich; Federica Pediconi; Pietro Panizza; Luis J Pina; Ruud M Pijnappel; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Per Skaane; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-05-23 Impact factor: 5.315

34 in total

1. Application of Two-Dimensional Discrete Dipole Approximation in Simulating Electric Field of a Microwave Breast Imaging System.

Authors: Samar Hosseinzadegan; Andreas Fhager; Mikael Persson; Paul M Meaney
Journal: IEEE J Electromagn RF Microw Med Biol Date: 2018-11-21

2. 3-D Microwave Tomography Using the Soft Prior Regularization Technique: Evaluation in Anatomically Realistic MRI-Derived Numerical Breast Phantoms.

Authors: Amir H Golnabi; Paul M Meaney; Shireen D Geimer; Keith D Paulsen
Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 4.538

MARIA M4: clinical evaluation of a prototype ultrawideband radar scanner for breast cancer detection.

1. A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeries.

2. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues.

Review 3. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer.

4. Cancer statistics, 2002.

5. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

6. Comparison of Screened and Nonscreened Breast Cancer Patients in Relation to Age: A 2-Institution Study.

7. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study.

8. Direct Extraction of Tumor Response Based on Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition for Image Reconstruction of Early Breast Cancer Detection by UWB.

Review 9. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation.

Review 10. Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women's information.

1. Application of Two-Dimensional Discrete Dipole Approximation in Simulating Electric Field of a Microwave Breast Imaging System.

2. 3-D Microwave Tomography Using the Soft Prior Regularization Technique: Evaluation in Anatomically Realistic MRI-Derived Numerical Breast Phantoms.

Review 3. Novel imaging approaches to screen for breast cancer: Recent advances and future prospects.

4. A 4-channel, vector network analyzer microwave imaging prototype based on software defined radio technology.

5. Advances in Microwave Near-Field Imaging: Prototypes, Systems, and Applications.

Review 6. Nanomaterials responding to microwaves: an emerging field for imaging and therapy.

7. Portable impulse-radar detector for breast cancer: a pilot study.

8. Discrete Dipole Approximation-Based Microwave Tomography for Fast Breast Cancer Imaging.

9. Clinical Evaluation of a Microwave-Based Device for Detection of Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.

10. Parameter Search Algorithms for Microwave Radar-Based Breast Imaging: Focal Quality Metrics as Fitness Functions.