Thaísa Regina Rocha Lopes1, Caroline Simões Silva2, André Filipe Pastor3, José Valter Joaquim Silva Júnior2. 1. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Setor de Virologia, Laboratório de Imunopatologia Keizo Asami, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. 2. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Aggeu Magalhães, Departamento de Virologia e Terapia Experimental, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. 3. Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sertão Pernambucano, Floresta, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Dear EditorBrazil is a dengue-endemic country and over the years has been facing several outbreaks
caused by different serotypes of the virus. More recently, between 2015 and 2016, the
country reported an annual average of 1,586,155 probable cases
,
. However, in 2017, two or four years after the probable introduction of
Zika virus (ZIKV)
,
, Brazil experienced a decrease in dengue fever to 252,054 cases, besides a
reduction in the number of severe dengue and deaths
.In 2017, the number of Zika cases also declined in Brazil in comparison to the previous
year, about 92% reduction
. The decrease in Zika cases influenced by anti-ZIKV herd immunity has already
been previously discussed
,
. However, regarding dengue disease, the causes of this decline are still not
fully understood. Indeed, as shown below, the current data on herd immunity,
cross-reactions between Dengue virus (DENV) and ZIKV, mosquito ecology,
vector control measures and environmental factors are not sufficient to explain the
dengue scenario in 2017.First, the anti-dengue herd immunity does not seem to explain the decline in dengue cases
in 2017. In Brazil, between 2009 and 2016, DENV-1 was the most prevalent serotype
. In the year 2015, for instance, the prevalence of DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3 and
DENV-4 was 94.1, 0.7, 0.4 and 4.8%, respectively
. In the same way, in 2016 (up to epidemiological week 4), prevalences were
97.24, 0.69, 0.69 and 1.38% to DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3 and DENV-4, respectively
. In 2017, however, serotype 2 was the most prevalent (54.3%)
. This very low prevalence of DENV-2 in the years 2015 and 2016 reduces the
possibility that dengue cases have fallen in 2017 due to the anti-DENV-2 herd
immunity.In another perspective, the studies on cross-reactivity between DENV and ZIKV also do not
explain the fall in dengue cases in 2017. Regarding anti-ZIKV immunity in relation to
DENVinfections, to our knowledge, there are only two reports on the in
vivo modulation of anti-ZIKV antibodies with respect to DENVinfection:
Stettler et al.
and George et al.
demonstrated the increase of DENV-2 infection by anti-ZIKV antibodies in mice
and rhesus monkeys. Interestingly, DENV-2, as commented above, was the most prevalent
serotype in 2017 in Brazil
. In this way, it would be expected that the herd immunity against ZIKV would
increase, but not decrease the number of dengue cases in Brazil.In Salvador, Brazil, Ribeiro et al.
suggested that the decrease in dengue cases between 2015 and 2017 would be the
result of the cross-herd immunity to ZIKV. Although Ribeiro et al.
did not mention the circulating DENV serotypes in Salvador during the study,
data from the Brazilian Ministry of Health demonstrated that the serotypes identified in
Bahia in 2015 were DENV-1 (96.3%) and DENV-4 (3.7%)
(data for 2016 and 2017 were not found).In addition to the immunological explanations, vector-related factors should also be
considered. About this, the increase of confirmed cases of chikungunya between 2016 and
2017, from 151,318
to 151,966
, weakens the hypothesis of the fall of DENVinfection in 2017 as a consequence
of vector control measures or environmental factors. Since 2015, DENV, ZIKV and
Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) circulate in Brazil and Aedes
aegypti coinfection with these arboviruses could favor the transmission of
a specific virus, reflecting the change in the epidemiological pattern. However, when
the vector was coinfected with two or three arboviruses (DENV-CHIKV and DENV-ZIKV) no
advantages were observed for any of these viruses
-
.Therefore, despite the progress on cross-reactivity studies between flaviviruses and on
the mosquito ecology, we believe that a more detailed analysis of the variables involved
in the DENV-ZIKV interaction is required. We recognize that arboviruses outbreaks result
from a complex interaction among several factors, such as environmental determinants,
mosquito ecology, viral genetics, behavior and immunological background of the
population
,
,
-
. However, it is important that the immunological studies are redesigned and
carried out taking into account the multiple variables capable of influencing the
cross-reaction between DENV and ZIKV: a) existence of different DENV serotypes, mainly
DENV-4, which forms a group considerably distant from DENV-1, -2 and -3
; b) animal model for in vivo studies; c) naïve populations or
with history of previous flaviviruses infections; d) coinfection or immunity to other
flaviviruses (e.g. Yellow fever virus and West Nile
virus); e) existence of antibodies against conserved or flavivirus-specific
regions of the envelope protein; f) genetic diversity of individuals’ immune responses;
g) intrinsic factors related to the viruses, such as possible mutations, mainly in the
gene sequence coding for the envelope. Finally, we argue that only by narrowing the gap
between laboratory assays and natural infections it will be possible to make
substantiated interpretations on the epidemiology of the areas with flaviviruses
co-circulation.
Authors: Karin Stettler; Martina Beltramello; Diego A Espinosa; Victoria Graham; Antonino Cassotta; Siro Bianchi; Fabrizia Vanzetta; Andrea Minola; Stefano Jaconi; Federico Mele; Mathilde Foglierini; Mattia Pedotti; Luca Simonelli; Stuart Dowall; Barry Atkinson; Elena Percivalle; Cameron P Simmons; Luca Varani; Johannes Blum; Fausto Baldanti; Elisabetta Cameroni; Roger Hewson; Eva Harris; Antonio Lanzavecchia; Federica Sallusto; Davide Corti Journal: Science Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Guilherme Sousa Ribeiro; Mariana Kikuti; Laura B Tauro; Leile Camila J Nascimento; Cristiane W Cardoso; Gúbio S Campos; Albert I Ko; Scott C Weaver; Mitermayer G Reis; Uriel Kitron Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Jeffy George; William G Valiant; Mary J Mattapallil; Michelle Walker; Yan-Jang S Huang; Dana L Vanlandingham; John Misamore; Jack Greenhouse; Deborah E Weiss; Daniela Verthelyi; Stephen Higgs; Hanne Andersen; Mark G Lewis; Joseph J Mattapallil Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Claudia Rückert; James Weger-Lucarelli; Selene M Garcia-Luna; Michael C Young; Alex D Byas; Reyes A Murrieta; Joseph R Fauver; Gregory D Ebel Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Nuno Rodrigues Faria; Raimunda do Socorro da Silva Azevedo; Oliver G Pybus; Marcio R T Nunes; Pedro F C Vasconcelos; Moritz U G Kraemer; Renato Souza; Mariana Sequetin Cunha; Sarah C Hill; Julien Thézé; Michael B Bonsall; Thomas A Bowden; Ilona Rissanen; Iray Maria Rocco; Juliana Silva Nogueira; Adriana Yurika Maeda; Fernanda Giseli da Silva Vasami; Fernando Luiz de Lima Macedo; Akemi Suzuki; Sueli Guerreiro Rodrigues; Ana Cecilia Ribeiro Cruz; Bruno Tardeli Nunes; Daniele Barbosa de Almeida Medeiros; Daniela Sueli Guerreiro Rodrigues; Alice Louize Nunes Queiroz; Eliana Vieira Pinto da Silva; Daniele Freitas Henriques; Elisabeth Salbe Travassos da Rosa; Consuelo Silva de Oliveira; Livia Caricio Martins; Helena Baldez Vasconcelos; Livia Medeiros Neves Casseb; Darlene de Brito Simith; Jane P Messina; Leandro Abade; José Lourenço; Luiz Carlos Junior Alcantara; Maricélia Maia de Lima; Marta Giovanetti; Simon I Hay; Rodrigo Santos de Oliveira; Poliana da Silva Lemos; Layanna Freitas de Oliveira; Clayton Pereira Silva de Lima; Sandro Patroca da Silva; Janaina Mota de Vasconcelos; Luciano Franco; Jedson Ferreira Cardoso; João Lídio da Silva Gonçalves Vianez-Júnior; Daiana Mir; Gonzalo Bello; Edson Delatorre; Kamran Khan; Marisa Creatore; Giovanini Evelim Coelho; Wanderson Kleber de Oliveira; Robert Tesh Journal: Science Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Eduardo Martins Netto; Andres Moreira-Soto; Celia Pedroso; Christoph Höser; Sebastian Funk; Adam J Kucharski; Alexandra Rockstroh; Beate M Kümmerer; Gilmara Souza Sampaio; Estela Luz; Sara Nunes Vaz; Juarez Pereira Dias; Fernanda Anjos Bastos; Renata Cabral; Thomas Kistemann; Sebastian Ulbert; Xavier de Lamballerie; Thomas Jaenisch; Oliver J Brady; Christian Drosten; Manoel Sarno; Carlos Brites; Jan Felix Drexler Journal: mBio Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Freddy Perez; Anthony Llau; Gamaliel Gutierrez; Haroldo Bezerra; Giovanini Coelho; Steven Ault; Sulamita Brandao Barbiratto; Marcelo Carballo de Resende; Lizbeth Cerezo; Giovanni Luz Kleber; Oscar Pacheco; Octavio Lenin Perez; Victor Picos; Diana P Rojas; Joao Bosco Siqueira; Marco Fidel Suarez; Eva Harris; Luis Gerardo Castellanos; Carlos Espinal; Jose Luis San Martin Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Iasmyn Dayanne Santos do Nascimento; André Filipe Pastor; Thaísa Regina Rocha Lopes; Pablo Cantalice Santos Farias; Juliana Prado Gonçales; Rodrigo Feliciano do Carmo; Ricardo Durães-Carvalho; Caroline Simões da Silva; José Valter Joaquim Silva Júnior Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rodrigo Feliciano do Carmo; José Valter Joaquim Silva Júnior; Andre Filipe Pastor; Carlos Dornels Freire de Souza Journal: Infect Dis Poverty Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 4.520