| Literature DB >> 30133133 |
Safdar Hussain1,2, Mengyao Sun1, Zixin Min1, Yuanxu Guo1, Jing Xu1, Nosheen Mushtaq3, Lisong Heng4, Huang Huang1, Yitong Zhao1, Ying Yuan1, Nazim Hussain2, Fujun Zhang1, Yan Han1, Peng Xu4, Jian Sun1,5, Shemin Lu1,5.
Abstract
The interplay between anabolic and catabolic factors regulates cartilage matrix homoeostasis. In OA, this balance is disrupted which results in cartilage degradation involving a plethora of inflammatory factors. Here, we identify a novel gene "Scm-like with four MBT domains protein 2" (SFMBT2) negatively regulated in OA cartilage. Articular cartilage from human OA patients undergoing knee arthroplasty surgery exhibited significantly decreased levels of SFMBT2 compared to the normal controls. Down-regulation of SFMBT2 by specific siRNA disturbed the metabolic homoeostasis and led to decreased expression of anabolic genes (SOX9, COL2A1) while increasing the expression of catabolic genes (MMP13 and ADAMTS4), in human chondrocytes. Finally, we revealed that SFMBT2 intervention by siRNA contributed to the catabolic phenotype of human chondrocytes mediated by NF-kB pathway.Entities:
Keywords: ECM metabolism; NF-κB; OA; SFMBT2; cartilage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30133133 PMCID: PMC6201222 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13826
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1Expression of SFMBT2 in ‘OA vs Normal’ Cartilage: A, Representative macromorphological pictures of the human knee ‘NORMAL’ articular cartilage (upper panel) and ‘OA’ cartilage (lower panel). B, Protein expression of SFMBT2 in the cartilage from ten human ‘OA’ patients and five ‘NORMAL’ controls, determined by Western blotting (left panel) and normalized with the house‐keeping gene GAPDH (right panel). C, Comparative analysis of SFMBT2 and MMP3 expression determined by Western blotting (left panel) and normalized with GAPDH (right panel) in articular cartilage from the four human ‘OA’ patients and three ‘NORMAL’ controls. D, Representative IHC staining images of SFMBT2 expression in ‘OA’ patients’ vs ‘Normal’ cartilage samples from the controls. Arrows indicate SFMBT2‐positive cells (left panel). Statistical analysis of per cent positive cells for SFMBT2 in IHC detection from OA vs Normal cartilages (right panel). Scale bar, 100 μm. Student's t test was used to identify the differences between two groups. * and ** stand for P‐values less than 0.05 and 0.01 respectively
Figure 2Impact of SFMBT2 intervention by siRNA in human chondrocytes (C28/I2 and SW1353) and the downstream regulatory mechanism of ECM degradation by si‐SFMBT2 mediated by NF‐κB: A&B, C28/I2 cells transfected with 80 nmol/L of SFMBT2‐specific siRNA (si‐SFMBT2) or scrambled (negative control) siRNA (si‐NC) and the effect of SFMBT2 knockdown on the expression of key chondrogenic genes (SOX9, COL2A1, ACAN, MMP13 and ADAMT4) measured at mRNA and protein levels, determined by RT‐qPCR (A) and Western blotting (B) respectively. C, SW1353 cells stimulated with TNF‐α (10 ng/mL) for different time points and the mRNA levels of SFMBT2, MMP13 and ADAMTS4 determined by RT‐qPCR. D, WB detection of IκB phosphorylation signals in SW1353 cells transfected with si‐NC or si‐SFMBT2 (80 nmol/L) and stimulated with or without TNF‐α (10 ng/mL). *: compared with si‐NC group; #: compared with both si‐SFMBT2 and TNF‐α+si‐NC groups. E, Detection of IκB phosphorylation signals in SW1353 cells transfected with si‐NC or si‐SFMBT2, stimulated with TNF‐α and incubated with or without NF‐κB inhibitor (BAY 11‐7082, 10 μmol/L/mL). *: compared with TNF‐α+si‐NC group; #: compared with both TNF‐α+si‐NC+inhibitor and TNF‐α+si‐SFMBT2 + inhibitor groups (F) Detection of RelA in the nuclear fraction of SW1353 cells transfected with si‐NC or si‐SFMBT2 and stimulated with or without TNF‐α. *: compared with si‐NC group; #: compared with both si‐SFMBT2 and TNF‐α+si‐NC groups. G, Detection of RelA in the nuclear fraction of SW1353 cells transfected with si‐NC or si‐SFMBT2, stimulated with TNF‐α and incubated with or without NF‐κB inhibitor. *: compared with si‐NC group; #: compared with both TNF‐α+si‐NC+inhibitor and TNF‐α+si‐SFMBT2 + inhibitor groups. H, Analysis of MMP13 levels in SW1353 cells transfected with si‐NC or si‐SFMBT2, and treated with or without TNF‐α. *: compared with si‐NC group; #: compared with both si‐SFMBT2 and TNF‐α+si‐NC groups. I, Detection of MMP13 levels in SW1353 cells transfected with si‐NC or si‐SFMBT2, stimulated with TNF‐α and incubated with or without NF‐κB inhibitor. *: compared with TNF‐α+si‐NC group; #: compared with both TNF‐α+si‐NC+inhibitor and TNF‐α+si‐SFMBT2 + inhibitor groups. GAPDH was used as internal control in RT‐qPCR and Western blot detections. Protein (WB) bands were quantitatively analysed by Image J software. All data represent mean ± SEM. Non‐parametric Mann‐Whitney U test was used to determine the differences between two groups. Both ‘*’ and ‘#’ stand for P‐value ≤ 0.05. Two different experimental approaches were followed to detect the downstream signals of the TNF‐α stimulation, and the downstream genes transcribed by NF‐κB, ie, (a) In signalling experiments, SW1353 cells were transfected with SFMBT2 siRNA along with the negative control siRNA for 24 h, subjected to BAY 11‐7082 for 30 min and then treated with or without TNF‐α for 1 h (C28/I2 for 30 min, data not shown); (b) To detect the expression of downstream target genes of NF‐κB (MMPs, ADAMTSs), SW1353 cells were transfected with SFMBT2 siRNA along with the negative control siRNA for 36 h, subjected to BAY 11‐7082 for 2 h (C28/12 for 1 h, data not shown) and then treated with or without TNF‐ α for 12 h