Conor J MacDonald1, Stephen Gandy2, Eilidh C M Avison3, Shona Matthew3, Rose Ross4, John G Houston3,5. 1. Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. conorj.macdonald@gmail.com. 2. Medical Physics, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK. 3. Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. 4. Vascular Laboratory, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK. 5. Radiology, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare non-contrast enhanced MRI with ultrasound (US) for measurement of arm blood vessel geometries and flow velocities in volunteers and patients with end-stage renal disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were scanned using US (reference standard), and MRI 2D time-of-flight (ToF), 2D phase contrast (PC), and 3D multi-echo data image combination (MEDIC). Patients were also scanned after arteriovenous fistula (AVF) surgery. RESULTS: For mean vessel diameters (radial and brachial arteries; cephalic vein) MEDIC measurements were similar to US (p > 0.05). However, ToF underestimated the mean diameter of the cephalic vein relative to US (p < 0.05). For arterial velocity measurements, the mean values derived by PC-MR and US were similar (p > 0.05). Post-operatively, the intra-luminal signal intensity was hypo-intense at the anastomosis site using ToF and MEDIC. At the same site the outer boundary of the vessel was consistently lost on ToF, but remained clearly delineated on the MEDIC images. DISCUSSION: With the exception of ToF, the MRI data demonstrated excellent agreement with US for measurements of vessel geometry and flow velocity. Further, the ability to clearly delineate the post-surgery vessel edges with MEDIC MRI suggests that the technique may be useful for surveillance after AVF creation or for patient-specific modelling studies.
OBJECTIVE: To compare non-contrast enhanced MRI with ultrasound (US) for measurement of arm blood vessel geometries and flow velocities in volunteers and patients with end-stage renal disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were scanned using US (reference standard), and MRI 2D time-of-flight (ToF), 2D phase contrast (PC), and 3D multi-echo data image combination (MEDIC). Patients were also scanned after arteriovenous fistula (AVF) surgery. RESULTS: For mean vessel diameters (radial and brachial arteries; cephalic vein) MEDIC measurements were similar to US (p > 0.05). However, ToF underestimated the mean diameter of the cephalic vein relative to US (p < 0.05). For arterial velocity measurements, the mean values derived by PC-MR and US were similar (p > 0.05). Post-operatively, the intra-luminal signal intensity was hypo-intense at the anastomosis site using ToF and MEDIC. At the same site the outer boundary of the vessel was consistently lost on ToF, but remained clearly delineated on the MEDIC images. DISCUSSION: With the exception of ToF, the MRI data demonstrated excellent agreement with US for measurements of vessel geometry and flow velocity. Further, the ability to clearly delineate the post-surgery vessel edges with MEDIC MRI suggests that the technique may be useful for surveillance after AVF creation or for patient-specific modelling studies.
Authors: A S Bode; R N Planken; M A G Merkx; F M van der Sande; L Geerts; J H M Tordoir; T Leiner Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Cornelis Doelman; Lucien E M Duijm; Ylian S Liem; Clemence L Froger; Alexander V Tielbeek; Astrid B Donkers-van Rossum; Philippe W M Cuypers; Petra Douwes-Draaijer; Jaap Buth; Harrie C M van den Bosch Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Krista N Larson; Amy L Gagnon; Melissa D Darling; James W Patterson; Thomas G Cropley Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Lannery S Lauvao; Daniel M Ihnat; Kaoru R Goshima; LeAnn Chavez; Angelika C Gruessner; Joseph L Mills Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: D Menegazzo; J P Laissy; A Dürrbach; M P Debray; B Messin; V Delmas; F Mignon; E Schouman-Claeys Journal: Radiology Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: R N Planken; T Leiner; R J Nijenhuis; L E Duijm; P W Cuypers; P Douwes-Draaijer; F M Van Der Sande; A G Kessels; J H M Tordoir Journal: J Vasc Access Date: 2008 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.283
Authors: Yong He; Christi M Terry; Cuong Nguyen; Scott A Berceli; Yan-Ting E Shiu; Alfred K Cheung Journal: J Biomech Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Robert R Mendes; Mark A Farber; William A Marston; Lesley C Dinwiddie; Blair A Keagy; Steven J Burnham Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: C J MacDonald; R Hellmuth; L Priba; E Murphy; S Gandy; S Matthew; R Ross; J G Houston Journal: Cardiovasc Eng Technol Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 2.495