Literature DB >> 30132226

Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Utilizing the Combination of Absorbable and Permanent Mesh in a Retromuscular Position: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

Miguel Ángel García-Ureña1, Javier López-Monclús2, Diego Cuccurullo3, Luis Alberto Blázquez Hernando4, Providencia García-Pastor5, Stefano Reggio3, Elena Jiménez Cubedo2, Carlos San Miguel Méndez4, Arturo Cruz Cidoncha4, Alvaro Robin Valle de Lersundi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal mesh reinforcement for abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) in complex hernias remains questionable. Use of biologic, absorbable and synthetic meshes has been described. The idea of using an absorbable mesh (AM) under a permanent mesh (PM) in a retromuscular position may help in these challenging situations.
METHODS: Between 2011 and 2016, consecutive patients undergoing open AWR utilizing an AM as posterior layer reinforcement and configuration of a large PM were identified in a multicenter prospectively maintained database in four hospitals. Main outcomes included demographics, ventral hernia classifications, perioperative data, complications and recurrences.
RESULTS: A total of 169 complex incisional hernias were analyzed. Mean age was 60.9, with mean body mass index 30.7 (range: 20-46). Location of incisional hernias (IH) was: 80 midline, 59 lateral and 30 midline and lateral. 78% were grade I and II in Ventral Hernia Working Group classification. 52% of patients were discharged with no complication. There were 19% seromas, 13% hematomas, 12% surgical-site infection and 10% skin dehiscence. Only partial mesh removal was necessary in one patient. After a mean follow-up of 26 months (range 15-59), there were five (3.2%) recurrences. Reoperations on patients showed a band of fibrosis separating the peritoneum from the PM.
CONCLUSION: The combination of AM with very large PM in the same retromuscular position in AWR seems to be safe. The efficacy with recurrence rates below 4% in complex midline and lateral IH may be explained by the use of larger PMs that are extended and configured with the support of AMs. Reoperations on patients have confirmed the previous experimental reports on the use of the AM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30132226     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4765-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  4 in total

1.  Reverse TAR may be added when necessary in open preperitoneal repair of lateral incisional hernias: a retrospective multicentric cohort study.

Authors:  Joaquin M Munoz-Rodriguez; Javier Lopez-Monclus; Marina Perez-Flecha; Alvaro Robin-Valle de Lersundi; Luis A Blazquez-Hernando; Ana Royuela-Vicente; Juan P Garcia-Hernandez; Aritz Equisoain-Azcona; Manuel Medina-Pedrique; Miguel A Garcia-Urena
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Bioabsorbable mesh use in midline abdominal wall prophylaxis and repair achieving fascial closure: a cross-sectional review of stage of innovation.

Authors:  S K Kamarajah; N J Smart; I R Daniels; T D Pinkney; R L Harries
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Second Look After Retromuscular Repair With the Combination of Absorbable and Permanent Meshes.

Authors:  Alvaro Robin Valle de Lersundi; Joaquín Munoz-Rodriguez; Javier Lopez-Monclus; Luis Alberto Blazquez Hernando; Carlos San Miguel; Ana Minaya; Marina Perez-Flecha; Miguel Angel Garcia-Urena
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-01-08

4.  Combining anterior and posterior component separation for extreme cases of abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  J Lopez-Monclus; J Muñoz-Rodríguez; C San Miguel; A Robin; L A Blazquez; M Pérez-Flecha; N Rupealta; M A Garcia-Urena
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.739

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.