Literature DB >> 30131882

Complete plastome sequencing from Toona (Meliaceae) and phylogenomic analyses within Sapindales.

Nan Lin1,2,3, Michael J Moore4, Tao Deng3, Hang Sun3, Lin-Sen Yang5, Yan-Xia Sun1, Heng-Chang Wang1.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Toona (Meliaceae, Sapindales) is a small genus of five species of trees native from southern and eastern Asia to New Guinea and Australia. Complete plastomes were sequenced for three Toona species to provide a basis for future plastome genetic studies in threatened species of Toona. In addition, plastome structural evolution and phylogenetic relationships across Sapindales were explored with a larger data set of 29 Sapindales plastomes (including members of six out of nine families).
METHODS: The plastomes were determined using the Illumina sequencing platform; the phylogenetic analyses were conducted using maximum likelihood by RAxML.
RESULTS: The lengths of three Toona plastomes range from 159,185 to 158,196 bp. A total of 113 unique genes were found in each plastome. Across Sapindales, plastome gene structure and content were largely conserved, with the exception of the contraction of the inverted repeat region to exclude ycf1 in some species of Rutaceae and Sapindaceae, and the movement of trnI-GAU and trnA-UGC to a position outside the inverted repeat region in some Rutaceae species. DISCUSSION: The three Toona plastomes possess the typical structure of angiosperm plastomes. Phylogenomic analysis of Sapindales recovered a mostly strongly supported phylogeny of Sapindales, including most of the backbone relationships, with some improvements compared to previous targeted-gene analyses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sapindales; Toona; phylogenomic analysis; plastome; structure

Year:  2018        PMID: 30131882      PMCID: PMC5947613          DOI: 10.1002/aps3.1040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Toona (Endl.) M. Roem., commonly known as red cedar, is a small genus of trees in the mahogany family (Meliaceae subfam. Cedreloideae). It is distributed across southern and eastern Asia, New Guinea, and eastern Australia (Mabberley, 2008). Toona was previously treated as a section of Cedrela P. Browne (Meliaceae), but the latter is now circumscribed to include only species of the Neotropics (Muellner et al., 2009). Approximately five species of Toona are currently recognized following the treatment by J. M. Edmonds (1995): T. calantas Merr. & Rolfe, T. ciliata M. Roem., T. fargesii A. Chev., T. sinensis (A. Juss.) M. Roem., and T. sureni (Blume) Merr. (Fig. 1). Several of these species are economically important as timber trees (e.g., T. ciliata and T. sureni; Peng and Edmonds, 2008) or as ornamental, including T. sinensis, which is the most cold‐tolerant species in Meliaceae and the only member of the family that can be cultivated successfully in northern Europe (Rushforth, 1999). Wild populations of most Toona species are under threat due to habitat loss and logging, especially the extremely rare T. fargesii, which may be endemic to China (Peng and Edmonds, 2008).
Figure 1

The distribution pattern of Toona. The colored dots represent the species range. A, B, and C indicate the sampling localities of three Toona species sequenced in the present study.

The distribution pattern of Toona. The colored dots represent the species range. A, B, and C indicate the sampling localities of three Toona species sequenced in the present study. The large pantropical family Meliaceae is a member of the order Sapindales (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, 2016) and consists of 50 genera and more than 650 species (Stevens, 2001 onwards). Meliaceae is strongly supported as monophyletic and consists of two subfamilies: Cedreloideae and Melioideae (Muellner et al., 2003). A recent phylogenetic study of Sapindales based on plastid rbcL, atpB, and trnL‐trnF sequences (Muellner‐Riehl et al., 2016) found that Simaroubaceae was sister to Meliaceae, with moderate support. Together, these two families formed a strongly supported clade with Rutaceae. Relationships among the remaining families of Sapindales were mostly moderately to strongly supported. Resolution and support found in Muellner‐Riehl et al. (2016) represent improvements over earlier studies based on fewer loci (e.g., Gadek et al., 1996; Muellner et al., 2007). Phylogenetic data sets based on large numbers of plastid loci have the potential to resolve relationships that have resisted resolution using only a few loci, as has been demonstrated in many recent studies (e.g., Stull et al., 2015; Duvall et al., 2016). Plastomes are generally conserved in structure, gene content, and gene order (Green, 2011; Ruhlman and Jansen, 2014), although rearrangements and gene loss have been detected in a number of lineages and most differences in plastome gene number are related to fluctuations in the size of the inverted repeat (IR) region (e.g., Guisinger et al., 2011; Knox, 2014; Zhu et al., 2016). To date, complete plastomes of 26 species across six families are available for Sapindales, including one Meliaceae species (Azadirachta indica A. Juss., Melioideae). Although McPherson et al. (2013) sequenced the T. ciliata plastome for phylogeographical study of this species in Australia, the plastome structure of this species was not reported, and the assembled plastome sequences of this species are not openly available. Additional sequenced plastomes from Meliaceae as well as across Sapindales may help to improve our understanding of phylogenetic relationships within the order and would provide insight into plastome evolution in this clade. In this study, we sequenced and characterized the complete plastomes of three Toona species and downloaded all 26 available Sapindales plastomes from GenBank, with the following objectives: (1) to provide a basis for future plastome genetic studies in threatened species of Toona, (2) to determine whether plastomes can resolve phylogenetic relationships among families of Sapindales, and (3) to evaluate plastome structure evolution across Sapindales.

METHODS

Fresh leaves of T. sinensis, T. sureni, and T. ciliata were obtained from Wuhan Botanical Garden (30.54°N, 110.42°E), Lushan Botanical Garden (29.55°N, 115.99°E), and the National Nature Reserve of Shi‐Ba‐Li valley (31.34°N, 109.92°E), respectively. Vouchers were deposited at the Herbarium of Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences (HIB) (Table 1). High‐quality plastid DNA was obtained following the plastid DNA extraction method of Shi et al. (2012). Approximately 30 g of fresh, young leaf tissue was used for each species, and for each plastome a DNA TruSeq Illumina (Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, USA) sequencing library, with 500‐bp insert sizes, was constructed at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) in Wuhan, Hubei, China, using 2.5–5 ng of sonicated plastid DNA. An Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA) and quantitative PCR were used to quantify DNA amounts in the libraries. Libraries were multiplexed by TruSeq adapter and 150‐bp paired‐end sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform at BGI (Wuhan, Hubei, China). The raw data are available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive (accession no. SRR6146642, SRR6146640, and SRR6146641).
Table 1

Taxa used in present study. Collection locality and voucher information are provided for newly sequenced plastomes

FamilySpeciesCollection localityVoucher informationGenBank accession no.
Anacardiaceae Rhus chinensis Mill.Yanggu, KoreaIM151120‐1 (Lee et al., 2016) NC_033535
Anacardiaceae Spondias bahiensis P. Carvalho, Van den Berg & MachadoNANA NC_030526
Anacardiaceae Spondias tuberosa L.NANA NC_030527
Burseraceae Boswellia sacra Flueck.Natural ParkUC29 (Kohany et al., 2006) NC_029420
Meliaceae Azadirachta indica A. Juss.NANA NC_023792
Meliaceae Toona ciliata M. Roem.SBLNan.Lin‐521(HIB) MF467523
Meliaceae Toona sinensis (A. Juss.) M. Roem.WBGNan.Lin‐522 (HIB) MF467522
Meliaceae Toona sureni (Blume) Merr.LBGNan.Lin‐523 (HIB) MF467521
Rutaceae Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) SwingleOmani, MadhaSu et al., 2014 KJ_865401
Rutaceae Citrus depressa HayataOkinawa, JapanIshikawa et al., 2016 LC147381
Rutaceae Citrus platymamma TanakaJeju Island, KoreaLee et al., 2015 NC_030194
Rutaceae Citrus sinensis (L.) OsbeckUSABausher et al., 2006 NC_008334
Rutaceae Clausena excavata Burm. f.USDAPI539715 (Shivakumar et al., 2016) NC_032685
Rutaceae Glycosmis mauritiana (Lam.) TanakaUSDAPI600641 (Shivakumar et al., 2016) KU949004
Rutaceae Glycosmis pentaphylla (Retz.) DC.USDAPI127866 (Shivakumar et al., 2016) NC_032687
Rutaceae Merrillia caloxylon (Ridl.) SwingleUSDAPI539733 (Shivakumar et al., 2016) NC_032688
Rutaceae Micromelum minutum Wight & Arn.USDAPI539744 (Shivakumar et al., 2016) NC_032689
Rutaceae Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng.USDAPI539745 (Shivakumar et al., 2016) NC_032684
Rutaceae Zanthoxylum bungeanum Maxim.Fengxian, ChinaLiu and Wei, 2017 KX497031
Rutaceae Zanthoxylum piperitum DC.NALee et al., 2015 NC_027939
Rutaceae Zanthoxylum schinifolium Siebold & Zucc.NAIM2014_ZS (Lee et al., 2016) NC_030702
Sapindaceae Acer buergerianum Miq.NASd0060 (Yang et al., 2014) KF753631
Sapindaceae Acer davidii Franch.Changan, ChinaEBL (Jia et al., 2016) NC_030331
Sapindaceae Acer miaotaiense P. C. TsoongShaanxi, ChinaMTQ20160406SAXHZ (Zhang et al., 2016) NC_030343
Sapindaceae Acer morrisonense HayataShaanxi, ChinaAmorr2015 (Li et al., 2017) NC_029371
Sapindaceae Dipteronia dyeriana A. HenryShaanxi, ChinaZhou et al., 2016 NC_031899
Sapindaceae Dipteronia sinensis Oliv.Shaanxi, ChinaZhou et al., 2016 NC_029338
Sapindaceae Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn.NAYang et al., 2016 NC_025554
Simaroubaceae Leitneria floridana Chapm.NAMO:MO 2008‐0670 (Yang et al., 2014) NC_030482

HIB = Herbarium of Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences; LBG = Lushan Botanical Garden, Jiangxi, China; NA = not available; SBL = National Nature Reserve of Shi‐Ba‐Li valley, Shiyan, China; WBG = Wuhan Botanical Garden, Wuhan, China; USDA = United States Department of Agriculture.

Taxa used in present study. Collection locality and voucher information are provided for newly sequenced plastomes HIB = Herbarium of Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences; LBG = Lushan Botanical Garden, Jiangxi, China; NA = not available; SBL = National Nature Reserve of Shi‐Ba‐Li valley, Shiyan, China; WBG = Wuhan Botanical Garden, Wuhan, China; USDA = United States Department of Agriculture. The raw reads were subsequently filtered for high‐quality reads following the method described by Sun et al. (2016). Filtered reads were assembled into contigs with a minimum length of 1000 bp using CLC Genomics Workbench 9 (Girard et al., 2011) with default parameters, except that the k‐mer value was set to 60 for T. sinensis and T. sureni, and 64 for T. ciliata, to produce the highest N50 value. The assembly statistics are presented in Appendix 1. After trimming, the contigs were ordered according to the reference genome Azadirachta indica A. Juss. (NC_023792). Plastid genomes were annotated with DOGMA (Wyman et al., 2004), and gene start and stop codons were determined through comparison to start and stop codons in the homologous genes of A. indica. Annotation of tRNA genes was conducted using tRNAscan‐SE (Schattner et al., 2005). Junctions between large single‐copy regions (LSCs) and IRs and small single‐copy regions (SSCs) and IRs of the three plastomes were verified with PCR and Sanger sequencing. Physical maps of plastomes were generated using GenomeVx (Conant and Wolfe, 2008). In total, 79 protein‐coding regions and the ycf15 region were identified from the plastomes of three Toona species and 26 other species of Sapindales, with two taxa of Malvales (Cytinus hypocistis (L.) L. and Hibiscus syriacus L.) as outgroups (Table 1). These sequences were then manually compiled into a single file of the 31‐taxon data set and aligned with MAFFT (Katoh et al., 2002) for phylogenetic analyses. GenBank information for all plastomes used for phylogenetic analyses are provided in Table 1. In order to further investigate the phylogenetic relationships within Sapindales, maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were conducted using RAxML version 7.4.2 (Stamatakis et al., 2008) under the general time‐reversible (GTR) substitution model. We conducted both unpartitioned and partitioned analyses. PartitionFinder version 1.1.1 (Lanfear et al., 2012) was employed to determine the best‐fit partition scheme for partitioned ML analysis. Bootstrap support was estimated with 1000 bootstrap replicates. In order to be convenient for subsequent population genetic study within Toona, simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were detected using MISA (Thiel et al., 2003) with thresholds of 10 repeat units for mononucleotide SSRs, five repeat units for di‐ and trinucleotide SSRs, and three repeat units for tetra‐, penta‐, and hexanucleotide SSRs. Additionally, repeat sequences were identified for each plastome using REPuter (Kurtz et al., 2001) with a minimum repeat size of 30 bp. Single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertion/deletion polymorphisms (indels) were also identified among three Toona plastomes with Geneious 7.0 (Kearse et al., 2012).

RESULTS

Within Toona, the plastome size of T. sureni was 159,371 bp, and those of T. sinensis and T. ciliata were 186 bp and 385 bp longer, respectively (Table 2). These three plastomes possess the typical quadripartite structure of angiosperm plastomes, comprising an LSC, an SSC, and two IR regions (Fig. 2). A total of 113 unique genes, including 30 tRNA genes, four rRNA genes, and 79 protein‐coding genes were found in each plastome. Nineteen genes were duplicated in the IR regions (Table 3). Additionally, 14 genes were found to possess one intron, and three genes (rps12, clpP, ycf3) were found to possess two introns (Appendix 2).
Table 2

Plastome characteristics of Sapindales included in this study. Three Toona species were sequenced for the first time in this study, and other species were accessed from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database

FamilySpeciesTotal genome length (bp)LSC length (bp)SSC length (bp)IR length (bp)No. of genes within IROverall G/C content (%)
Anacardiaceae Rhus chinensis 149,01196,88218,64716,7411837.8
Anacardiaceae Spondias bahiensis 162,21889,60618,38227,0751937.7
Anacardiaceae Spondias tuberosa 162,03989,45318,36827,1391937.7
Burseraceae Boswellia sacra 160,54388,05418,96226,7642037.6
Meliaceae Azadirachta indica 160,73788,13718,62426,9831937.5
Meliaceae Toona ciliata 158,98687,16318,32926,7471937.9
Meliaceae Toona sinensis 159,18587,35817,93326,9471937.9
Meliaceae Toona sureni 159,37187,50518,47226,6971937.9
Rutaceae Citrus aurantiifolia 159,89387,14818,76226,9912038.4
Rutaceae Citrus depressa 160,12087,79418,37626,9552038.5
Rutaceae Citrus platymamma 160,12187,73218,39326,9982038.5
Rutaceae Citrus sinensis 16012987,74418,39326,9962038.5
Rutaceae Clausena excavata 161,17288,05518,29527,4111738.3
Rutaceae Glycosmis mauritiana 160,13187,71018,38327,0191638.5
Rutaceae Glycosmis pentaphylla 159,84587,49418,32927,0111638.4
Rutaceae Merrillia caloxylon 159,96987,91218,02927,0141638.5
Rutaceae Micromelum minutum 160,41687,36718,62227,2141738.5
Rutaceae Murraya koenigii 159,40287,07718,12327,1011638.5
Rutaceae Zanthoxylum bungeanum 158,40185,89817,61127,4461938.5
Rutaceae Zanthoxylum piperitum 158,15485,34017,52627,6441938.5
Rutaceae Zanthoxylum schinifolium 158,96386,52818,25627,0891938.4
Sapindaceae Acer buergerianum 156,91185,31418,09326,7521837.9
Sapindaceae Acer davidii 157,04485,41018,11226,7611837.9
Sapindaceae Acer miaotaiense 156,59586,32718,06826,1001837.9
Sapindaceae Acer morrisonense 157,19785,65518,08626,7281837.8
Sapindaceae Dipteronia dyeriana 157,07185,52918,08226,7301938.0
Sapindaceae Dipteronia sinensis 157,08085,45518,09326,7661937.8
Sapindaceae Sapindus mukorossi 160,48185,64918,87427,9792137.7
Simaroubaceae Leitneria floridana 158,76385,68918,18627,4442037.6

IR = inverted repeat; LSC = large single copy; SSC = small single copy.

Figure 2

Physical maps of three Toona plastomes.

Table 3

List of genes present in the plastomes of the three Toona species

FunctionGene groupGene name
Protein synthesis and DNA replicationRibosomal RNAs rrn4.5 (×2), rrn5 (×2), rrn16 (×2) c rrn23 (×2)
Transfer RNAs trnH‐GUG, trnK‐UUU a, trnQ‐UUG, trnS‐GCU, trnG‐UCC a, trnR‐UCU, trnC‐GCA, trnD‐GUC, trnY‐GUA, trnE‐UUC, trnT‐GGU, trnS‐UGA, trnG‐UCC, trnfM‐CAU, trnS‐GGA, trnT‐UGU, trnL‐UAA a, trnF‐GAA, trnV‐UAC a, trnM‐CAU, trnW‐CCA, trnP‐UGG, trnI‐CAU a (×2), trnL‐CAA (×2), trnV‐GAC (×2), trnI‐GAU (×2), trnA‐UGC a (×2), trnR‐ACG (×2), trnN‐GUU (×2), trnL‐UAG
Small subunit rps2, rps3, rps4, rps7 (×2), rps8, rps11, rps12 a (×2), rps14, rps15, rps16, rps18, rps19
Ribosomal protein large subunit rpl2 a (×2), rpl14, rpl16, rpl20, rpl22, rpl23 (×2), rpl32, rpl33, rpl36
RNA polymerase rpoA, rpoB, rpoC1 a, rpoC2
PhotosynthesisPhotosystem I psaA, psaB, psaC, psaI, psaJ
Photosystem II psbA, psbB, psbC, psbD, psbE, psbF, psbH, psbI, psbJ, psbK, psbL, psbM, psbN, psbT, psbZ
Cytochrome b 6/f petA, petB, petD, petG, petL, petN
ATP synthase atpA, atpB, atpE, atpF a, atpH, atpI
NADH dehydrogenase ndhA a, ndhB a (×2), ndhC, ndhD, ndhE, ndhF, ndhG, ndhH, ndhI, ndhJ, ndhK
Large subunit of RuBisCO rbcL
Miscellaneous proteinsSubunit of acetyl‐CoA‐carboxylase accD
c‐type cytochrome synthesis gene ccsA
Envelope membrane protein cemA
Protease clpP a
Translational initiation factor infA
Maturase matK
Genes of unknown functionHypothetical conserved coding frame ycf1, ycf2 (×2), ycf3 a, ycf4

Genes with introns.

Plastome characteristics of Sapindales included in this study. Three Toona species were sequenced for the first time in this study, and other species were accessed from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database IR = inverted repeat; LSC = large single copy; SSC = small single copy. Physical maps of three Toona plastomes. List of genes present in the plastomes of the three Toona species Genes with introns. Across Sapindales, Spondias bahiensis P. Carvalho, Van den Berg & Machado (Anacardiaceae) and Rhus chinensis Mill. (Anacardiaceae) possessed the largest (162,218 bp) and smallest (149,011 bp) plastomes, respectively (Table 2). The latter also possessed the longest LSC and the shortest IR regions. Boswellia sacra Flueck. (Burseraceae) and Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn. (Sapindaceae) possessed the longest SSC and IR regions, respectively. Almost all 29 Sapindales plastomes contained 19 to 20 genes. Sapindus mukorossi of Sapindaceae possessed the longest IR region (21 genes). Among all 29 Sapindales plastomes, eight exhibited an IR expansion to rpl22 at the IR/LSC region boundaries and the IR region of S. mukorossi extended to rps3. In some Rutaceae (e.g., Clausena excavata Burm. f., Glycosmis mauritiana (Lam.) Tanaka, Glycosmis pentaphylla (Retz.) DC., Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng., Merrillia caloxylon (Ridl.) Swingle, and Micromelum minutum Wight & Arn.) and Sapindaceae (e.g., Acer davidii Franch., A. morrisonense Hayata), the IR region was found to have contracted such that all of ycf1 is now within the SSC region. Moreover, in all of the above‐mentioned six Rutaceae plastomes, both trnI‐GAU and trnA‐UGC were present in the SSC region, while all rRNA genes were still located in the IR region. In Sapindales, infA was found as a pseudogene in several cases of Sapindaceae (e.g., B. sacra, A. davidii, A. morrisonense, and A. miaotaiense P. C. Tsoong). The G/C content of all plastomes was approximately 38% among 29 Sapindales plastomes (Table 2). The sequence divergence of 79 protein‐coding genes among all 29 genomes varied from 0.00361 (rps7) to 0.1582 (rps16). The genes rps16, ycf1, and matK had the highest sequence divergence (0.15582, 0.12381, and 0.09137, respectively; Fig. 3). Notably, rpl22 was found to have a high variation in length, from 171 bp (Micromelum minutum, Rutaceae) to 514 bp (Toona sureni, Meliaceae) (Appendix S1).
Figure 3

Plot of nucleotide variability (Pi) values among 29 Sapindales plastomes.

Plot of nucleotide variability (Pi) values among 29 Sapindales plastomes. The alignment of the 31‐taxon data set was 63,597 bp in length. The best partition scheme determined by PartitionFinder contained 17 partitions (maximum likelihood score [ln L] = −229027.17027, Bayesian information criterion [BIC] = 460434.027954). The unpartitioned and partitioned ML analyses yielded identical tree topology, with slightly higher support values in the partitioned tree (Fig. 4; the unpartitioned tree is not shown). Most nodes had very high bootstrap support (Fig. 4), and Anacardiaceae, Sapindaceae, Rutaceae, and Meliaceae were recovered as monophyletic. The backbone of Sapindales was strongly supported except for one node that united Burseraceae, Rutaceae, and Sapindaceae (57%; Fig. 4). Meliaceae was sister to Simaroubaceae + Rutaceae.
Figure 4

The best maximum likelihood tree of Sapindales based on the 17‐partition analysis of 79 plastid genes (and the ycf15 region). Numbers above branches are maximum likelihood bootstrap support values (unlabeled branches have bootstrap support of 100%).

The best maximum likelihood tree of Sapindales based on the 17‐partition analysis of 79 plastid genes (and the ycf15 region). Numbers above branches are maximum likelihood bootstrap support values (unlabeled branches have bootstrap support of 100%). A total of 193 SSRs were identified in the three plastomes of Toona. Among these, 70 were distributed in T. sureni, 57 in T. sinensis, and 66 in T. ciliata (Appendix 3). The majority of SSRs were A/T mononucleotides, a total of 14 AT dinucleotide repeats were found in the three plastomes, and one TA dinucleotide repeat was detected in T. sinensis, whereas the only AG dinucleotide repeat from T. sureni was located in the rpoB‐trnC‐GCA intergenic region. The other kinds of repeat units (e.g., six dinucleotide; four trinucleotide; three tetra‐, penta‐, and hexanucleotide) were not found in the three plastomes of Toona. Most SSRs were located in intergenic regions (72.5%), with few in introns (12.5%) and genes (15%). Overall, nine SSRs were shared by all three Toona species, including four in intergenic regions (trnE‐UCC/trnT‐GGU, trnT‐GGU/psbD, ccsA/ndhD, and ycf15/rps12), three in exons (rpoC2, rpoB, and psbF), and two in introns (trnL‐UAA and ndhB). In total, 23 repeats were detected in three Toona plastomes. A majority of the repeats (69.56%) were 30 to 40 bp in length, and 17.40% of the repeats were longer than 50 bp. Four repeats were shared by three Toona plastomes (Appendix S2). Additionally, we detected 466 SNPs (0.4%) and 90 indels among three plastomes, and we screened out four noncoding regions (psbZ‐trnG, psbA‐trnK, trnF‐ndhJ, trnK‐rps16) with potential to be loci for identification of Toona species (Appendix S3).

DISCUSSION

In most angiosperm plastomes, the IR/LSC boundary lies within the rps19 gene and the SSC/IR boundary lies within the ycf1 gene (Kumar et al., 2009). Among the 29 Sapindales plastomes, the LSC/IRB boundary of the majority lies within the rps19 gene, while nine of these 29 plastomes have experienced an IR region expansion. Obvious IR region expansion to the LSC region has been detected in many other taxa, e.g., in Pelargonium L'Hér. (Chumley et al., 2006), Tetracentron Oliv. (Sun et al., 2013), and Veronica nakaiana Ohwi (Choi et al., 2016). In contrast, within Sapindales, there have been at least eight cases where the SSC/IRA boundary has contracted to exclude all of ycf1 (Fig. 4). IR region contraction has been found to occur in several ways, ranging from complete IR loss (e.g., Geraniaceae [Blazier et al., 2011], Cephalotaxus oliveri Mast. [Yi et al., 2013], and Agathis dammara (Lamb.) Rich. & A. Rich. [Wu and Chaw, 2014]), to the loss of tRNA genes within the IR region (e.g., Epifagus virginiana (L.) W. P. C. Barton [Morden et al., 1991] and Bergera koenigii L. [Shivakumar et al., 2016]), to the rpl22 loss in rosids (Jansen et al., 2011), and to contraction at the IR/SSC boundaries reported in a number of early‐diverging angiosperms (e.g., Buxus L., Epimedium L., and Macadamia F. Muell.) (Hansen et al., 2007). Notably, in Rutaceae, all Clauseneae genera are characterized by the absence of trnI‐GAU and trnA‐UGC in the IR region. Tsuji et al. (2007) indicated that the tRNA loss may be caused by the RNA editing during the tRNA mutation. Pseudogenization of the infA gene has been detected in a number of angiosperm plastomes such as tobacco (Shinozaki et al., 1986), Arabidopsis Heynh. (Sato et al., 1999), and Oenothera elata Kunth (Hupfer et al., 2000), whereas among 29 Sapindales plastomes this was only detected in four plastomes (Boswellia sacra, Acer davidii, A. morrisonense, and A. miaotaiense) of Sapindaceae (Blazier et al., 2016). In some cases, the effect of plastid‐to‐nucleus gene transfer has been demonstrated to generate the pseudogenization of this gene (Millen et al., 2001). As has been found in many other studies involving plastome‐scale phylogenetic analysis (Parks et al., 2009), we recovered improved phylogenetic support along the backbone of Sapindales compared to previous targeted gene analyses. We recovered Meliaceae as sister to the clade formed by Simaroubaceae (only one species included) + Rutaceae with maximal support, differing from the topology recovered by Muellner et al. (2007) and Muellner‐Riehl et al. (2016), where a moderately supported clade of Meliaceae + Simaroubaceae was sister to Rutaceae. Our result is consistent with the earlier work of Gadek et al. (1996) based on trnL‐F sequences, although they recovered only weak support. Unfortunately, the problem of the previously unsupported relationship of Sapindaceae with other Sapindales (Muellner‐Riehl et al., 2016) could also not be resolved by our plastome data analysis. It is important to emphasize caution for these results, however. Additional taxon sampling for complete plastomes, including additional lineages of already‐sampled families as well as the inclusion of the early‐diverging Sapindales families Biebersteiniaceae, Kirkiaceae, and Nitrariaceae may affect topology and support. Likewise, the plastome itself can be treated as a single locus for the purpose of phylogenetics, and genomic‐scale nuclear data may provide different estimates of phylogeny, especially for short branches. Within Rutaceae, our results are highly congruent with those of the previous study (Shivakumar et al., 2016), which also found a clade of Citrus + Merrillia sister to a clade composed of (Micromelum + Glycosmis) + (Murraya + Clausena), although in the latter clade the bootstrap support was low. In our tree, all of the taxa sampled in Shivakumar et al. (2016) formed a clade, which is sister to Zanthoxylum. Our analysis suggests that tribe Clauseneae sensu Swingle and Reece (1967; Micromelum Blume, Glycosmis Corrêa, Clausena Burm. f., Murraya J. Koenig, and Merrillia Swingle) is not monophyletic because Merrillia is sister to Citrus L. of the tribe Citreae. The genera of Clauseneae are characterized by the absence of two tRNA genes (trnI‐GAU and trnA‐UGC), while this is not found in the genus Citrus (Fig. 4). Additionally, four genera (Micromelum + Glycosmis + Murraya + Clausena) in Rutaceae and two species (Acer davidii + Acer morrisonense) in Sapindales, characterized by the absence of ycf1 in the SSC region, each formed a clade in our phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4). This gene loss shared by multiple taxa shows a particularly strong case of homoplasy in the phylogeny. Within Sapindaceae, Sapindus L. is sister to a clade containing Dipteronia Oliv. and Acer L. Although the support value is weak (57%), the two species of Dipteronia do not form a clade, instead forming a grade with respect to Acer. The plastome structure and gene content of Toona reported in the present study enrich the available plastome resources within Sapindales, the comparative analyses among 29 plastomes provide insight into the plastome evolution of Sapindales, and the phylogenomic analyses of Sapindales improve our understanding of phylogenetic relationships within this order. In addition, the SSRs detected in three Toona species could provide a basis for future plastome genetic studies in Toona, especially in the threatened species. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
SpeciesRead length (bp)No. of plastid readsNo. of plastid contigsTotal no. of bases in contigsAverage depth of coverage (×)Percentage of reads mappingContigs N50Maximum/minimum contig size (bp)
T. sureni 150119,14760810,415112.7299.2724,24580,048/2049
T. sinensis 150102,32381845,09996.7199.9121,13184,024/2015
T. ciliata 150134,438108794,274130.8899.7610,02786,924/2043
GeneExon1Intron1Exon2Intron2Exon3
trnK‐UUU 28/28/2836/36/36
trnG‐UCC 23/23/23724/724/72449/49/49
trnL‐UAA 36/36/36530/530/53049/49/49
trnV‐UAC 36/36/36600/602/60238/38/38
trnI‐GAU 41/41/41956/956/95433/33/33
trnA‐UGC 37/37/37841/841/84134/34/34
atpF 438/438/438720/720/720155/155/155
ndhA 536/536/5361099/1098/1098551/551/551
ndhB 756/756/756682/682/682775/775/775
rpl2 433/433/433671/671/671390/390/390
rps12 b 113/113/11325/25/25537/537/537231/231/231
rpoC1 1619/1619/1619753/753/753434/434/434
clpP 198/198/198690/690/690290/290/290860/860/86067/67/67
ycf3 152/152/152791/789/789227/227/227628/628/628728/728/728

Values presented correspond to T. sureni/T. sinensis/T. ciliata, respectively.

Intron 1 of rps12 is not shown because rps12 is trans‐spliced.

Species/BaseLength (bp)Position in plastid genome
Toona ciliata
A109258–9267, 34,518–34,527, 38,871–38,880, 54,296–54,305, 57,729–57,738, 62,577–62,586, 67,493–67,502, 68,780–68,789, 74,450–74,459, 116,277–116,286, 118,064–118,073, 118,119–118,128, 134,208–134,217
1150,135–50,145, 73,952–73,962, 84,456–84,466, 116,647–116,657, 13,576–13,586, 147,115–147,125
127044–7055, 31,827–31,838, 113,763–113,774
13143,677–143,689
154738–4752
1678,707–78,722
T1014,085–14,094, 27,614–27,623, 70,109–70,118, 73,655–73,664, 73,788–73,797, 83,409–83,418, 83,918–83,927, 119,623–119,632, 128,850–128,859, 130,504–130,513, 131,949–131,958
115882–5892, 7033–7043, 12,659–12,669, 31,412–31,422, 45,602–45,612, 54,222–54,232, 57,155–57,165, 57,236–57,246, 62,239–62,249, 63,742–63,752, 70,526–70,536, 99,025–99,035, 125,450–125,460
129479–9490, 19,766–19,777, 52,802–52,813, 125,141–125,152, 132,376–132,387
136828–6840, 74,806–74,818, 102,461–102,473
1548,905–48,919, 118,464–118,478
AT1021,267–21,276, 33,424–33,433, 49,396–49,405, 49,786–49,795, 50,733–50,742, 54,811–54,820, 121,130–121,139
Toona sureni
A1034,799–34,808, 54,560–54,569, 57,999–58,008, 67,156–67,165, 67,798–67,807, 74,266–74,275, 116,568–116,577, 134,590–134,599
1113,859–13,869, 50,428–50,438, 62,866–62,876, 74,770–74,780, 118,360–118,370, 147,491–147,501
127220–7231, 84,776–84,787, 118,408–118,419
1379,023–79,035, 144,054–144,046
149769–9782
174886–4902, 39,136–39,152
T106989–6998, 9648–9657, 10,432–10,441, 12,954–12,963, 14,367–14,376, 27,928–27,937, 31,526–31,534, 32,502–32,511, 45,214–45,223, 54,487–54,496, 57,499–57,508, 60,086–60,095, 61,837–61,846, 62,536–62,545, 83,645–83,654, 112,278–112,287, 117,742–117,751, 119,996–120,005, 125,519–125,528, 129,225–129,234, 130,879–130,888, 132,330–132,339
1114,446–14,456, 57,418–57,428, 64,050–64,060, 74,061–74,071, 99,376–99,386, 120,092–120,102, 125,826–125,836
1220,080–20,091, 45,861–45,872, 70,828–70,839, 73,966–73,977, 85,407–85,418, 132,757–132,768
1331,711–31,723, 53,075–53,087, 75,127–75,139, 102,811–102,823
1649,165–49,180, 118,836–118,851
AT1021,581–21,590, 33,705–33,714, 49,669–49,678, 50,079–50,088, 55,074–55,083, 121,505–121,514
AG1229,112–29,123
Toona sinensis
A1034,737–34,746, 39,096–39,105, 57,923–57,932, 62,771–62,780, 66,759–66,768, 67,688–67,697, 68,975–68,984, 74,149–74,158, 74,646–74,655, 116,472–116,481, 134,407–134,416
1113,706–13,716, 50,357–50,367, 84,652–84,662, 116,842–116,852, 147,314–147,324
129384–9395, 32,046–32,057, 113,958–113,969
13143,876–143,878
1578,903–78,917
184864–4881
T1014,215–14,224, 27,768–27,777, 31,065–31,074, 45,827–45,836, 49,496–49,505, 70,304–70,313, 73,985–73,994, 84,114–84,123, 112,128–112,137, 119,821–119,830, 127,827–127,836, 129,049–129,058, 130,703–130,712, 132,148–132,157
116010–6020, 6956–6966, 31,631–31,641, 62,433–62,443, 63,936–63,946, 70,721–70,731, 73,851–73,861, 99,220–99,230, 125,648–125,658
129607–9618, 12,788–12,799, 19,896–19,907, 53,002–53,013, 125,339–125,350, 132,575–132,586
1375,002–75,014, 49,128–49,141
1449,128–49,141
AT1033,644–33,653
TA1049,617–49,626, 50,954–50,963
  46 in total

1.  Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA.

Authors:  Stacia K Wyman; Robert K Jansen; Jeffrey L Boore
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  Robert Lanfear; Brett Calcott; Simon Y W Ho; Stephane Guindon
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Resolving basal lamiid phylogeny and the circumscription of Icacinaceae with a plastome-scale data set.

Authors:  Gregory W Stull; Rodrigo Duno de Stefano; Douglas E Soltis; Pamela S Soltis
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.844

4.  Highly rearranged and size-variable chloroplast genomes in conifers II clade (cupressophytes): evolution towards shorter intergenic spacers.

Authors:  Chung-Shien Wu; Shu-Miaw Chaw
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 9.803

5.  Variable presence of the inverted repeat and plastome stability in Erodium.

Authors:  John C Blazier; Robert K Jansen; Jeffrey P Mower; Madhu Govindu; Jin Zhang; Mao-Lun Weng; Tracey A Ruhlman
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Complete plastid genome sequences of three Rosids (Castanea, Prunus, Theobroma): evidence for at least two independent transfers of rpl22 to the nucleus.

Authors:  Robert K Jansen; Christopher Saski; Seung-Bum Lee; Anne K Hansen; Henry Daniell
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data.

Authors:  Matthew Kearse; Richard Moir; Amy Wilson; Steven Stones-Havas; Matthew Cheung; Shane Sturrock; Simon Buxton; Alex Cooper; Sidney Markowitz; Chris Duran; Tobias Thierer; Bruce Ashton; Peter Meintjes; Alexei Drummond
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Comparative Transcriptome and Chloroplast Genome Analyses of Two Related Dipteronia Species.

Authors:  Tao Zhou; Chen Chen; Yue Wei; Yongxia Chang; Guoqing Bai; Zhonghu Li; Nazish Kanwal; Guifang Zhao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Plastid translation and transcription genes in a non-photosynthetic plant: intact, missing and pseudo genes.

Authors:  C W Morden; K H Wolfe; C W dePamphilis; J D Palmer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Cephalotaxus oliveri (Cephalotaxaceae): evolutionary comparison of cephalotaxus chloroplast DNAs and insights into the loss of inverted repeat copies in gymnosperms.

Authors:  Xuan Yi; Lei Gao; Bo Wang; Ying-Juan Su; Ting Wang
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative genomics and phylogenetic relationships of two endemic and endangered species (Handeliodendron bodinieri and Eurycorymbus cavaleriei) of two monotypic genera within Sapindales.

Authors:  Jiaxin Yang; Guoxiong Hu; Guangwan Hu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Complete Chloroplast Genomes of 14 Mangroves: Phylogenetic and Comparative Genomic Analyses.

Authors:  Chengcheng Shi; Kai Han; Liangwei Li; Inge Seim; Simon Ming-Yuen Lee; Xun Xu; Huanming Yang; Guangyi Fan; Xin Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.