F Casas1, I Valduvieco2, G Oses2, L Izquierdo3, I Archila4, M Costa3, K S Cortes2, T Barreto2, F Ferrer5,6. 1. Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain. Fcasas@clinic.cat. 2. Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Urology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Pathology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain. 5. Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 6. Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) for biochemical relapse (BR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) showed increased disease-free survival (DFS) in three previous randomized trials. Retrospective phase II trials evaluated if early salvage RT (ESRT) is equivalent to ART. Our study aims to compare ART and ESRT to salvage RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared RP plus ART and ESRT versus SRT. Indication for RT was made by PSA determination after RP: ART when PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/ml, ESRT when PSA ≤ 0.3 after PSA rise from 0.0 to SRT PSA ≥ 0.3. The cause of death of each patients was analyzed, DFS, cause-specific survival (CSS) overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in relation to RT intention. RESULTS: Between 1993 and 2008, 204 patients with a median age of 65 years (44-75) were treated. The median follow-up was 160 months (28.1-273.3). At diagnosis, 89.7% had localized clinical stages and 90.2% had Gleason (G) ≤ 7. The median PSA was 10 (range 4-101). The postoperative G was ≥ 7 in 66.2%; 56.4% had ≥ 2 positive margins; 29.4% received ART, 20% ESRT and 59.3% SRT. The DFS for ART, ESRT and SRT was 74, 56 and 39% with significant differences between the three groups (p < 0.001). ART + ESRT were combined versus SRT; for the DFS, the significant differences (p < 0.001) remained 67% versus 39%. Positive margins, pT3 and pre-RT PSA were significant factors on multivariate analysis. The CSS in the ART + ESRT group was 92 vs. 78% in the SRT group (p < 0.05). OS was 69% in ART + ESRT vs. 57% in SRT (p < 0.05). MFS was 82.7% in ART + ESRT vs. 67.4% in SRT. CONCLUSIONS: In this study the ART + ESRT presented benefits versus SRT in DFS, CSS, OS and MFS.
PURPOSE: Adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) for biochemical relapse (BR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) showed increased disease-free survival (DFS) in three previous randomized trials. Retrospective phase II trials evaluated if early salvage RT (ESRT) is equivalent to ART. Our study aims to compare ART and ESRT to salvage RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared RP plus ART and ESRT versus SRT. Indication for RT was made by PSA determination after RP: ART when PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/ml, ESRT when PSA ≤ 0.3 after PSA rise from 0.0 to SRT PSA ≥ 0.3. The cause of death of each patients was analyzed, DFS, cause-specific survival (CSS) overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in relation to RT intention. RESULTS: Between 1993 and 2008, 204 patients with a median age of 65 years (44-75) were treated. The median follow-up was 160 months (28.1-273.3). At diagnosis, 89.7% had localized clinical stages and 90.2% had Gleason (G) ≤ 7. The median PSA was 10 (range 4-101). The postoperative G was ≥ 7 in 66.2%; 56.4% had ≥ 2 positive margins; 29.4% received ART, 20% ESRT and 59.3% SRT. The DFS for ART, ESRT and SRT was 74, 56 and 39% with significant differences between the three groups (p < 0.001). ART + ESRT were combined versus SRT; for the DFS, the significant differences (p < 0.001) remained 67% versus 39%. Positive margins, pT3 and pre-RT PSA were significant factors on multivariate analysis. The CSS in the ART + ESRT group was 92 vs. 78% in the SRT group (p < 0.05). OS was 69% in ART + ESRT vs. 57% in SRT (p < 0.05). MFS was 82.7% in ART + ESRT vs. 67.4% in SRT. CONCLUSIONS: In this study the ART + ESRT presented benefits versus SRT in DFS, CSS, OS and MFS.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adjuvant radiotherapy; Biochemical relapse; Early salvage and salvage radiotherapy; Postoperative radiotherapy
Authors: William U Shipley; Wendy Seiferheld; Himanshu R Lukka; Pierre P Major; Niall M Heney; David J Grignon; Oliver Sartor; Maltibehn P Patel; Jean-Paul Bahary; Anthony L Zietman; Thomas M Pisansky; Kenneth L Zeitzer; Colleen A F Lawton; Felix Y Feng; Richard D Lovett; Alexander G Balogh; Luis Souhami; Seth A Rosenthal; Kevin J Kerlin; James J Dignam; Stephanie L Pugh; Howard M Sandler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ashesh B Jani; Eduard Schreibmann; Peter J Rossi; Joseph Shelton; Karen Godette; Peter Nieh; Viraj A Master; Omer Kucuk; Mark Goodman; Raghuveer Halkar; Sherrie Cooper; Zhengjia Chen; David M Schuster Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Nicola Fossati; R Jeffrey Karnes; Stephen A Boorjian; Marco Moschini; Alessandro Morlacco; Alberto Bossi; Thomas Seisen; Cesare Cozzarini; Claudio Fiorino; Barbara Noris Chiorda; Giorgio Gandaglia; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Steven Joniau; Lorenzo Tosco; Shahrokh Shariat; Gregor Goldner; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Detlef Bartkowiak; Karin Haustermans; Bertrand Tombal; Francesco Montorsi; Hein Van Poppel; Thomas Wiegel; Alberto Briganti Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-07-30 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Mark V Mishra; Eli D Scher; Jocelyn Andrel; Andrew C Margules; Sarah E Hegarty; Edouard J Trabulsi; Terry Hyslop; Robert B Den; Costas D Lallas; Leonard G Gomella; Adam P Dicker; Timothy N Showalter Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; R Jeffrey Karnes; Stephen A Boorjian; Michele Colicchia; Alberto Bossi; Thomas Seisen; Cesare Cozzarini; Nadia Di Muzio; Barbara Noris Chiorda; Emanuele Zaffuto; Thomas Wiegel; Shahrokh F Shariat; Gregor Goldner; Steven Joniau; Antonino Battaglia; Karin Haustermans; Gert De Meerleer; Valérie Fonteyne; Piet Ost; Hendrick Van Poppel; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2017-12-08 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ian M Thompson; Richard K Valicenti; Peter Albertsen; Brian J Davis; S Larry Goldenberg; Carol Hahn; Eric Klein; Jeff Michalski; Mack Roach; Oliver Sartor; J Stuart Wolf; Martha M Faraday Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ahmed Abugharib; William C Jackson; Vasu Tumati; Robert T Dess; Jae Y Lee; Shuang G Zhao; Moaaz Soliman; Zachary S Zumsteg; Rohit Mehra; Felix Y Feng; Todd M Morgan; Neil Desai; Daniel E Spratt Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: C Parker; N Clarke; J Logue; H Payne; C Catton; H Kynaston; C Murphy; R Morgan; C Morash; W Parulekar; M Parmar; C Savage; J Stansfeld; M Sydes Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Date: 2007-02-07 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Alberto Briganti; R Jeffrey Karnes; Steven Joniau; Stephen A Boorjian; Cesare Cozzarini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Wolfgang Hinkelbein; Karin Haustermans; Bertrand Tombal; Shahrokh Shariat; Maxine Sun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Francesco Montorsi; Hein Van Poppel; Thomas Wiegel Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Heather L Huelster; Aaron A Laviana; Daniel D Joyce; Li-Ching Huang; Zhiguo Zhao; Tatsuki Koyama; Karen E Hoffman; Ralph Conwill; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Lisa E Paddock; Antoinette Stroup; Matthew Cooperberg; Mia Hashibe; Brock B O'Neil; Sherrie H Kaplan; Sheldon Greenfield; David F Penson; Daniel A Barocas Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 3.498