| Literature DB >> 30128139 |
Pamella Akoth Ogada1, Thomas Debener2, Hans-Michael Poehling1.
Abstract
The complexity of tospovirus-vector-host plant interaction is linked to a range of factors influencing vector's efficacy in virus transmission, leading to high variability in the transmission efficiency within vector populations. Main shortcomings of most studies are the missing information on the intrinsic potential of individual insects to serve as efficient vectors, both at phenotypic and at genotypic levels. Moreover, detailed analysis of vector competence heredity and monitoring the splitting of both genotypes and phenotypes in filial generations has not been reported. In this study, using the model system Frankliniella occidentalis and Tomato spotted wilt virus, we evaluated the inheritance and stability of the trait vector competence in a population through basic crossings of individually characterized partners, as well as virgin reproduction. We hypothesized that the trait is heritable in F. occidentalis and is controlled by a recessive allele. From the results, 83% and 94% of competent and noncompetent males respectively, inherited their status from their mothers. The trait was only expressed when females were homozygous for the corresponding allele. Furthermore, the allele frequencies were different between males and females, and the competent allele had the highest frequency in the population. These suggest that the trait vector competence is inherited in single recessive gene in F. occidentalis, for which the phenotype is determined by the haplodiploid mechanism. These findings are fundamental for our understanding of the temporal and spatial variability within vector populations with respect to the trait vector competence and at the same time offer an essential basis for further molecular studies.Entities:
Keywords: Frankliniella occidentalis; Tomato spotted wilt virus; haplodiploidy; inheritance; intraspecific variation; tospovirus; vector competence
Year: 2016 PMID: 30128139 PMCID: PMC6093171 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2484
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
The possible parental genotypes virgin females and the resulting F1 outcome, with the expected phenotypes and the possible genotypes
| Parental phenotypes (virgin females) (Possible genotypes) | F1 offspring phenotypes (all males) (Possible genotypes) |
|---|---|
| ♀ com (cc) | ♂ com (c‐) |
| ♀ n‐com (CC) | ♂ n‐com (C‐) |
| ♀ n‐com (Cc) | ♂ n‐com:com (½C‐:½c‐) |
CC & C‐: homozygous noncompetent female and noncompetent male status, respectively; Cc: heterozygous noncompetent female; cc & c‐: homozygous competent female and competent male status, respectively.
Intended parental cross‐combinations and the expected F1 offspring outcome with the expected phenotypes and the possible genotypes
| Cross‐combinations# | Possible parental crosses genotypesFemale ( | Expected F1 offspring phenotypes (genotypes) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ♀ | ♂ | ||
| 1 | comp (cc) × n‐comp (C‐) | n‐com (Cc) | com (c‐) |
| 2 | n‐comp (CC) × comp (c‐) | n‐com (Cc) | n‐com (C‐) |
| 3 | n‐comp (Cc) × comp (c‐) | n‐com:com (½Cc:½cc) | n‐com:com (½C‐:½c‐) |
| 4 | comp (cc) × comp (c‐) | com (cc) | com (c‐) |
| 5 | n‐comp (CC) × n‐comp (C‐) | n‐com (CC) | n‐com (C‐) |
| 6 | n‐com (Cc) × n‐comp (C‐) | n‐com (½CC:½Cc) | n‐com:com (½C‐:½c‐) |
CC & C‐: homozygous noncompetent female and noncompetent male status, respectively; Cc: heterozygous noncompetent female; cc & c‐: homozygous competent female and competent male status, respectively.
Figure 1Representation of competence status (genotypes) in the test populations of Frankliniella occidentalis; (A) representation of different genotypes in virgin females' population, (B) cross‐combinations representation of different genotypes. CC & C‐: homozygous noncompetent female and noncompetent male status, respectively; Cc: heterozygous noncompetent female; cc & c‐: homozygous competent female and competent male status, respectively
Figure 2Evaluation of inheritance of the trait vector competence by Frankliniella occidentalis: Status of progeny from virgin females. F0♀ represents the virgin female parents, and F1♂ represents the male offspring. Comp = competent status, non‐comp = noncompetent. CC & C‐: homozygous noncompetent female and noncompetent male status, respectively; Cc: heterozygous noncompetent female; cc & c‐: homozygous competent female and competent male status, respectively
The relative numbers of the resulting offspring (F1) competent and noncompetent per parental cross‐combination
| The relative number of competent and noncompetent F1 per parents cross‐combination | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Possible parental crosses phenotypesFemale ( | Competent F1 | Noncompetent F1 | ||||
|
| ♂ | Total |
| ♂ | Total | ||
| 1 | comp (cc) × n‐comp (C‐) | 0 | 32 | 32 | 16 | 14 | 20 |
| 2 | n‐comp (CC) × comp (c‐) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 16 | 27 |
| 3 | n‐comp (Cc) × comp (c‐) | 24 | 34 | 58 | 18 | 43 | 61 |
| 4 | comp (cc) × comp (c‐) | 100 | 146 | 246 | 15 | 28 | 43 |
| 5 | n‐comp (CC) × n‐comp (C‐) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 17 |
| 6 | n‐com (Cc) × n‐comp (C‐) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 124 | 212 | 336 | 68 | 100 | 146 | |
Chi‐square analysis of the parental–offspring relatedness
| Relations | χ2 |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mother <=> Sons | 79.58 | 2 | <.0001 | 301 |
| Mother <=> Daughters | 23.64 | 2 | <.0001 | 181 |
| Father <=> Sons | 0.0117 | 1 | .9138 | 301 |
| Father <=> Daughters | 60.19 | 1 | <.0001 | 181 |
Expected proportions of genotypes for the trait vector competence in both males and females in the test population
| Males | Females | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (Genotypes ( | Expected genotype frequencies | Genotypes (♀) | Expected genotype frequencies |
| C‐ |
| CC |
|
| c‐ |
| Cc | 2 |
| cc |
| ||
Chi‐square analysis for the agreement with the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium using the observed and the expected numbers of genotypes in the test population
| Females genotypes | Males genotypes | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | Cc | cc | Total | C‐ | c‐ | Total | ||
| Numbers observed | 8 | 45 | 139 | 192 | 100 | 212 | 312 | |
| Numbers expected | 7.68 | 61.44 | 122.88 | 192 | 62.4 | 249.6 | 312 | |
| Females | χ2(1,192) = 6.53 |
| ||||||
| Males | χ2(1,312) = 88.06 |
| ||||||
| Total | χ2(1,504) = 94.58 |
| ||||||
Allele frequencies calculated from the observed numbers in the test population
| Number of alleles in the population | Frequency of the competent allele (c) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | c | Total | ||
| In females | 61 | 323 | 384 | 0.841 |
| In males | 100 | 212 | 312 | 0.680 |
Estimation of the expected allele frequencies for the hypothesized cross‐combination per million pairs of parents
| Mating types | Expected frequencies | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Proportions | % | Per million pairs of parents | |
| CC × ‐c |
| 3.20 | 32,000 |
| cc × ‐C |
| 12.80 | 128,000 |
| Cc × ‐C | 2 | 6.40 | 64,000 |
| Cc × ‐c | 2 | 25.60 | 256,000 |
| cc × ‐c |
| 51.20 | 512,000 |
| CC × ‐C |
| 0.80 | 8,000 |
| Totals | 1 | 100 | 1,000,000 |