| Literature DB >> 30127812 |
Ehsan Faghih-Mirzaei1,2, Mohammad Seifi3, Mehdi Abaszadeh2, Kamiar Zomorodian4, Helia Helali4.
Abstract
A novel one-pot two step tandem reaction for the synthesis of indolizine-1-carbonitrile derivatives (5a-i) was identified. The route comprises 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction of aromatic aldehyde derivatives (1a-i), malononitrile (2) and 1-(2-(4-bromophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)-2-chloropyridin-1-ium (4) under ultrasound irradiation at room temperature in the presence of triethylamine at acetonitrile. The product compounds were tested against bacteria and fungi. It was revealed that compound 5b had the most antifungal activity (range MICs = 8-32 µg/mL) and compound 5g had the most antibacterial activity (range MICs = 16-256 µg/mL). Molecular docking of compounds (5a-i) into fungal 14α-demethylase and bacterial protein tyrosine phosphatase active sites were also performed and probable binding mode of compounds 5b and 5g were determined.Entities:
Keywords: 3-Dipolar cycloaddition; Antibacterial activity; Antifungal activity; Indolizine-1-carbonitriles; 1; Molecular docking; Ultrasound irradiation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30127812 PMCID: PMC6094435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Scheme 1Synthesis of indolizine-1-carbonitrile derivatives
Figure 1Accomodation of compound 5g in the active site of PtpB (Protein tyrosine phosphataseB).
Figure 3Accomodation of compound 5b in the active site of 14α-demethylase
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC) of the synthetic compounds (µg/mL).
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Gram-positive |
| 64 | G | G | 64 | 32 | 256 | 128 | 0.25 |
|
| 64 | 64 | G | 64 | 8 | 256 | 128 | 0.25 | |
|
| 64 | G | G | 64 | 16 | 64 | 128 | 4 | |
|
| 16 | G | G | 16 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 16 | |
|
| 16 | G | G | 64 | 16 | 256 | 64 | 8 | |
|
| 32 | G | G | 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 0.25 | |
|
| 32 | G | G | 8 | 32 | 64 | 128 | 0.125 | |
|
| 32 | G | G | 32 | 16 | 64 | 64 | 0.125 | |
|
| G | 64 | G | G | G | G | G | 0.5 | |
|
| G | 64 | G | G | G | G | G | 0.25 | |
| Gram-negative |
| 64 | G | 128 | 256 | 128 | G | 256 | 0.06 |
| TGCR | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | 8 | |
| TGCR | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | 8 | |
| TGCR | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | 16 | |
| TGCS | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | 0.5 | |
| TGCS | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | 0.125 | |
| TGCS | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | 0.25 | |
|
| G | G | G | G | G | G | G | 0.25 | |
|
| G | G | G | G | G | G | G | 16 | |
|
| G | G | G | G | G | G | G | 32 | |
|
| G | G | G | G | G | G | G | 16 | |
MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC: Minimum microbicidal concentration; MRSA: Methicillin resistant S. aureus; MSSA: Methicillin sensitive S. aureus; TGCR E. coli: Third generation cephalosporines resistance E.coli; TGCs E.coli: Third generation cephalosporines sensitiveE.coli.
For the compounds 5b, 5d, 5e and 5i no significant antibacterial effect was found.
"G" stands for Growth (>512 µg/mL).
Clinical isolates.
Oxacillin was used as control against gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus, B. cereuscand Enterococci spp), ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxon were used as control against P. aeruginosa and E. coli species respectively.
Antifungal activity (MIC and MFC) of the synthetic compounds (µg/mL).
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Yeasts |
| G | 16 | 32 | G | 256 | 64 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 0.25 |
|
| G | 16 | 8 | G | 128 | 32 | 128 | 256 | 256 | 1 | |
|
| G | 36 | 32 | G | G | 32 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 0.25 | |
|
| 128 | 8 | 64 | G | 128 | 64 | 256 | 128 | 128 | 0.25 | |
|
| G | 32 | 128 | G | G | 64 | 256 | 128 | 128 | 1 | |
|
| G | 32 | 128 | G | 256 | 128 | 256 | G | 256 | 0.25 | |
|
| G | 8 | 32 | G | 256 | 32 | G | 128 | 64 | 0.5 | |
|
| G | 32 | 64 | G | 256 | 64 | 256 | G | 256 | 0.5 | |
|
| G | 8 | 128 | G | 256 | 64 | 256 | G | 256 | 0.5 | |
|
| G | 32 | 128 | G | 256 | 128 | 256 | G | 256 | 0.25 | |
|
| G | 32 | 16 | G | 256 | 16 | 128 | 256 | 256 | 64 | |
|
| 128 | 8 | 16 | 128 | 128 | 16 | 64 | 128 | 128 | 0.25 | |
|
| G | 16 | 16 | G | 256 | 64 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 2 | |
|
| G | G | G | G | G | G | 256 | G | G | 0.25 | |
| Filamentous |
| G | 32 | 128 | G | G | G | G | G | 64 | 16 |
|
| G | 32 | G | G | G | G | G | G | 64 | 8 | |
|
| G | 128 | G | G | G | G | G | G | G | 8 | |
For the compounds 5d no significant antibacterial effect was found.
"G" stands for Growth (>512 µg/mL).
MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration; MFC: Minimum fungicidal concentration.
Fluconazole was used as control against yeasts and filamentous fungi.
Figure 2Hydrogen bonds and π-cation interactions of compound 5g with active site residues of PtpB (Protein tyrosine phosphataseB).
Figure 4Interaction of compound 5b with active site residues of 14α-demethylase and molecule