| Literature DB >> 30126246 |
Ilioara Oniga1, Cristina Pușcaș2, Radu Silaghi-Dumitrescu3, Neli-Kinga Olah4, Bogdan Sevastre5, Raluca Marica6, Ioan Marcus7, Alexandra Cristina Sevastre-Berghian8, Daniela Benedec9, Carmen Elena Pop10, Daniela Hanganu11.
Abstract
The biological properties and main phenolic compounds of the O. vulgare L. ssp. vulgare extract are described in the present paper. The polyphenolic compounds were analyzed by chromatographic and spectrophotometric techniques. The antioxidant potential was evaluated using several methods: CUPRAC (cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity), FRAP (ferric reducing ability of plasma), inhibition of lipid peroxidation catalyzed by cytochrome c, and superoxide (SO) scavenging assays. The antimicrobial activity of the oregano extract was evaluated by means of agar-well diffusion assay. The hepatoprotective effect of the O. vulgare extract on CCl₄-induced hepatotoxicity was evaluated in rats. Liver injury was estimated by determination of alanine aminotransaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransaminase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase GGT, total protein and albumin concentrations, glutathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA). These values were improved by the administration of oregano extract. A specific phenolic profile was evidenced by these data, with large amounts of rosmarinic and chlorogenic acids. The oregano extract showed very strong antioxidant activity in good agreement with the phenolic content. Antimicrobial activity was good, especially against Salmonella enteritidis and Aspergillus niger strains. The high hepatoprotective, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, along with polyphenol-rich content, can support the use of O. vulgare in therapy. We also expect our results to open new research directions for designing important new drug products, using indigenous plant material.Entities:
Keywords: Origanum vulgare; antimicrobial; antioxidant; cythocrome c; hepatoprotective; polyphenols
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30126246 PMCID: PMC6222339 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23082077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Phenolic compounds determined by the HPLC method in O. vulgare ssp. vulgare extract.
| Compounds | [M − H]−, | Retention Time (tR), min | UV Detection | MS Detection | Concentration (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gentisic acid | 153 | 3.69 ± 0.04 | NO | YES | <0.02 |
| Chlorogenic acid | 353 | 6.43 ± 0.05 | YES | YES | 2.10 ± 0.14 |
| 163 | 9.48 ± 0.08 | NO | YES | <0.02 | |
| Hyperoside | 463 | 18.60 ± 0.12 | YES | YES | 1.05 ± 0.03 |
| Isoquercitrin | 463 | 20.29 ± 0.10 | YES | YES | 0.71 ± 0.19 |
| Rutin | 609 | 20.76 ± 0.15 | YES | YES | 0.64 ± 0.15 |
| Rosmarinic acid | 360 | 21.80 ± 0.10 | YES | YES | 12.83 ± 2.19 |
| Quercitrin | 447 | 23.64 ± 0.13 | YES | YES | 0.50 ± 0.08 |
| Quercetin | 301 | 27.55 ± 0.15 | NO | YES | <0.02 |
| Luteolin | 285 | 29.64 ± 0.19 | YES | YES | 0.10 ± 0.04 |
Values are the mean ± SD (n = 3).
Total polyphenol content and antioxidant activity of O. vulgare ssp. vulgare extract.
| Sample | TPC (mg GAE/g) | Flavonoid (mg RE/g) | Caffeic Acids (mg CAE/g) | CUPRAC (µM TE/g) | FRAP (µM TE/g) | SO Scavenging (µM TE/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 94.69 ± 4.03 | 38.46 ± 3.54 | 29.92 ± 1.08 | 1284 ± 66 | 794.40 ± 25.80 | 44.00 ± 0.56 |
Each value is the mean ± SD of three independent measurements. TPC, total polyphenols content; SO, superoxide; GAE, gallic acid equivalents; RE, rutin equivalents; CAE, caffeic acid equivalents; TE, Trolox equivalents.
Figure 1Liposome oxidation by cytochrome c, in the presence of O. vulgare ssp. vulgare extract and rosmarinic acid in the concentration shown in the figure legend.
Antimicrobial activity of O. vulgare ssp. vulgare extract.
| Sample | Diameter of Inhibition Zone (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 18.0 ± 0.00 | 16.0 ± 0.00 | 17.0 ± 1.00 | 16.0 ± 1.00 | 19.0 ± 0.00 | |
| Gentamicin | 19.0 ± 1.00 | 18.0 ± 1.06 | 22.0 ± 0.50 | 18.0 ± 0.00 | - |
| Amphotericin B |
| - | - | - | 21.0 ± 0.00 |
The values represent the average of three determinations ± SD.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of O. vulgare ssp. vulgare extract.
| Samples | MICs (µg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 78.13 | 156.25 | 156.25 | 78.13 | 19.53 | |
| 70% Ethanol | 625 | 2500 | 1250 | 625 | 2500 |
Figure 2Effects of O. vulgare ssp. vulgare extract on: ALT (A); AST (B); GGT (C) activity and plasma total protein (D); and albumin (E) concentration (mean ± SD, 5 animals/group). “+” is the group which received CCl4 and “-” is the group which didn’t received CCl4. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001 compared to the reference group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared to the CCl4 alone treated group.
Figure 3Effects of O. vulgare ssp. vulgare extract on: glutathione peroxidase (GPx) (A); catalase (CAT) (B); superoxide dismutase (SOD) (C); and malondialdehyde (MDA) (D) (mean ± SD, five animals/group). “+” is the group which received CCl4 and “-” is the group which didn’t received CCl4. ### p < 0.001 compared to the reference group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared to the CCl4 alone treated group.
Figure 4Effects of O. vulgare ssp. vulgare extract on the histologic aspect of the liver: (A,E) the negative control groups receiving only carbon tetrachloride (1 mL/b.w.) showed infiltrate around the portal spaces (black arrow), necrotic foci (white arrows); and the groups receiving therapy with the extract in a dose of: 1 mg/b.w., (B,F); 3.5 mg/b.w.; (C,G); and 7 mg/b.w. (D,H). The animals treated with the highest dose showed decreased fibrosis (black arrows). Duration: (A–D) four weeks; (E–H) six weeks. Hematoxylin and eosin stain; Bar, 100 μm.