Literature DB >> 30126075

MiR-873 inhibition enhances gefitinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer cells by targeting glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1.

Shidai Jin1, Jing He1, Jun Li1, Renhua Guo1, Yongqian Shu1, Ping Liu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The five-year survival rate of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is very low. MiR-873 is involved in the growth, metastasis, and differentiation of tumors. Herein, we determined the target gene and influence of miR-873 in NSCLC.
METHODS: MiRanda and Targetscan websites were used to predict the target gene of miR-873 in NSCLC. Luciferase activity was examined using a dual luciferase reporter gene assay kit. The viability, tube formation, and proliferation of cells were analyzed by cell counting kit-8, angiogenic analysis, and flow cytometry, respectively. The levels of miR-873 and GLI1 were evaluated using quantitative real-time PCR and Western blot assays.
RESULTS: Low levels of GLI1 and high levels of miR-873 were observed in an NSCLC cell line (PC9) highly sensitive to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. There was a negative correlation between miR-873 and GLI1 expression in PC9 and PC9/GR cells. The inhibition of miR-873 enhanced GLI1 levels. MiR-873 expression was inhibited by gefitinib. Gefitinib markedly reduced the viability, tube formation, and cell number in PC9 cells. However, suppression of miR-873 enhanced the resistance and knockdown of GLI1 enhanced the sensitivity of PC9 cells to gefitinib.
CONCLUSIONS: GLI1 is a target gene of miR-873 in NSCLC. The inhibition of miR-873 increased gefitinib resistance of NSCLC cells via the upregulation of GLI1. These results indicate that miR-873-GLI1 signaling is involved in gefitinib resistance in NSCLC.
© 2018 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiogenesis; GLI1; miR-873; non-small cell lung cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30126075      PMCID: PMC6166090          DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cancer        ISSN: 1759-7706            Impact factor:   3.500


Introduction

Lung cancer (LC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, and the leading cause of cancer‐related death in China. Non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of LC cases. At the time of diagnosis, approximately 75% of patients are in middle and late stages. The five‐year survival rate is very low.1, 2 Platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy is the first‐line standard treatment for late‐stage NSCLC.3, 4, 5 The emergence of molecular targeted drugs has brought great promise for the treatment of LC.6, 7, 8 In patients with EGFR sensitive mutations, the efficacy rate of EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is 71.2%, thus EGFR‐TKIs have become first‐line drugs for patients with EGFR sensitive mutant advanced LC. However, almost all patients eventually suffer from drug resistance. The primary or secondary drug resistance of EGFR‐TKIs greatly limits their clinical application9, 10, 11 therefore, finding a mechanism to alter drug resistance is of significant importance. MicroRNA (miRNAs) are non‐coding RNAs, mainly mediating gene expression at posttranscriptional levels.12, 13 Hundreds of miRNAs have been found. In the human genome, miRNAs regulate protein encoding genes at a rate of approximately 1:3, controlling cell apoptosis, proliferation, differentiation, metabolism, individual development and tumorigenesis, and drug resistance.14, 15, 16 Target gene expression is regulated by two mechanisms: (i) binding to the untranslated region (3'UTR) of the target messenger RNA (mRNA) 3' end, inhibiting its translation; and (ii) like small interfering RNA (siRNA), miRNA binds to the target and degrades target mRNA.17, 18, 19 Recent studies have found that miRNAs regulate drug resistance by mediating their targeting genes in various cancers.20, 21, 22, 23, 24 In recent years, abnormal expression of miR‐873 has been found in many kinds of tumors, such as breast and ovarian cancers, and glioma.25, 26, 27 MiR‐873 plays a role in promoting cancer or anticancer by regulating tumor cell invasion, migration, proliferation, apoptosis, and sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs.28, 29, 30, 31 Nevertheless, the role of miR‐873 in drug resistance in NSCLC is still unknown. We detected mRNA levels of miR‐873 in normal human lung epithelial cells and highly sensitive EGFR‐TKI NSCLC cells by quantitative real‐time (qRT)‐PCR. According to data from the miRanda and Targetscan websites, we predicted the binding sites of miR‐873 to related target genes. The influence of miR‐873 on NSCLC repressed by gefitinib was explored.

Methods

Cell culture

Normal human lung epithelial (BEAS‐2B), EGFR‐TKI highly sensitive NSCLC (PC9), EGFR‐TKI resistant (PC9/GR), and human embryonic kidney (HEK293T) cell lines were provided by Shanghai Mingjing Biology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). BEAS‐2B and HEK293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (Solarbio, Shanghai, China), including 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 ug/mL streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China), and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 (Thermo Electron, Marietta, OH, USA).

Cell transfection

The miR‐873 inhibitor and empty vector (mock) were obtained from Shanghai Tuoran Biology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The negative control siRNA (MBS 8241404) and GLI1 siRNA (MBS8208749) were purchased from MyBio Source (San Diego, CA, USA). PC9 cells were transfected with mimics or siRNA (50 pmol) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Solarbio) for 48 hours according to a standardized method. Using data from the miRanda and Targetscan websites, we predicted the binding site of the GLI1 gene to miR‐873. The 3'UTR of GLI1 with affinity for miR‐873 and a mutant reporter were cloned to the downstream of firefly luciferase of psiCHECK‐2 vector (Hibio, Hangzhou, China). MiR‐873 was then co‐transfected into HEK293T cells using Lipofectamine 2000. After transfection, luciferase activity analysis was performed.

Quantitative real‐time PCR assay

Total RNA was harvested by TRIzol (Yeasen, Shanghai, China). One microgram of RNA was applied to synthesize complementary DNA (cDNA) using a TIANScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). The reaction conditions were: 85°C for 15 minutes and 4°C for five minutes. The cDNA was amplified using a SYBR Premix ExTaq II kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The reaction conditions were: 95°C for five minutes, 92°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 35 seconds for 30 cycles, and 72°C for 35 seconds. The primers are listed in Table 1. U6 and
Table 1

Primer sequences

Primer nameSequence (5′‐3′)Product size (bp)
miR‐873‐forwardCTGCACTCCCCCACCTG
miR‐873‐reverseGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT220
GLI1‐forwardTACTCACGCCTCGAAAACCT
GLI1‐reverseAGGACCATGCACTGTCTTGA235
U6‐forwardACACCAAGCAGTCCGAAGAG
U6‐reverseACAAAATTTCTCACGCCGGT220
GAPDH‐forwardCCATCTTCCAGGAGCGAGAT
GAPDH‐reverseTGCTGATGATCTTGAGGCTG222
Primer sequences glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were used as internal controls. The 2‐ΔΔCT formula was used to assess gene expression.

Western blot

Total protein was harvested by radioimmunoprecipitation assay (high) (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). A BCA protein assay kit (Jining Shiye, Shanghai, China) was used to detect protein content. Protein was separated by sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Tengxiang, Yueqing, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China). The membranes were sealed using tris‐buffered saline plus tween 20 containing 5% non‐fat milk at room temperature for 90 minutes, and hybridized to anti‐GLI1 (ab134906) and anti‐GAPDH (ab157156) (dilution: 1:1200; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 4°C overnight. Corresponding secondary antibodies (rabbit anti‐mouse immunoglobulin G [IgG], Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; #58802, 1:7000; goat anti‐mouse IgG, ab6785, 1:7000, Abcam) were added to bind to the membranes at 37°C for 60 minutes. The blots were exposed by a WFH‐101B gel imaging analysis system (Jinke, Shanghai, China).

Luciferase activity analysis

A dual luciferase reporter gene assay kit (Yeasen) was used to measure luciferase activity following the standard method. HEK293T cells were lysed using lysate. Cell suspension was transferred to a black enzyme plate. The cells were then resuspended using medium. The supernatant was seeded in a 96‐well plate, then firefly and sea kidney luciferase reaction solutions were added to the plates. The data were measured using a multimode reader (SuPerMax‐3100, Shanpu, Shanghai, China).

Cell counting kit‐8 analysis

Cell counting kit‐8 (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was used to assess the viability of PC9 cells. PC9 cells were cultured in 96‐well plates (2 × 103 cells/well) in the incubator for 24 hours. Cells were then exposed to miR‐873 inhibitor, empty vector (mock), and 40 nM gefitinib for 48, 72, and 144 hours. After treatment, the CCK‐8 reagent was dripped to the well, and cells were cultured in the incubator for four hours. Absorbance was assessed using a multimode reader.

Angiogenic analysis

PC9 cells were cultured in 6‐well plates (3 × 104 cells/well) in the incubator for 24 hours. Cells were exposed to miR‐873 inhibitor, empty vector (mock), and 40 nM gefitinib for 48 hours. The medium from each group was collected for the following experiments. Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) was added into a 96‐well plate and allowed to polymerize at 37°C for 30 minutes. The human umbilical vein endothelial cells (2 × 104/well) were plated in a 96‐well plate containing the pre‐described condition medium and maintained for 20 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2. Finally, the endothelial cell tube was observed under an inverted microscope (TL3000 Ergo; Leica, Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Tube formation was defined as: 1000 × total area of connected tubes/total image area.

Flow cytometry

The proliferation of PC9 cells was detected by carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl amino ester (CFSE). After cell treatment, cell suspension was prepared. CFSE solution was added into the cell suspension and shaken up. Cell proliferation was evaluated using flow cytometry (Attune NxT, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Statistical analysis

The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. One‐way analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the differences between groups using SPSS version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Each experiment was repeated at least three times.

Results

MiR‐873 expression was negatively correlated with GLI1 expression in PC9 cells

The mRNA levels of miR‐873 and GLI1 were detected by qRT‐PCR assay, which revealed a significant decrease of GLI1 mRNA, but an increase of miR‐873 mRNA in PC9 cells compared to BEAS‐2B cells (Fig 1a,b) (P < 0.05) (Fig 1a,b). MiR‐873 expression was negatively correlated with GLI1 expression in PC9 cells (Fig 1c,d). As shown in Figure 1e, the half‐maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of gefitinib was < 20 nM in PC9 cells; however, the IC50 of gefitinib reached > 40 nM when the cells were treated with miR‐873 inhibitors.
Figure 1

miR‐873 expression was negatively correlated with GLI1 expression in PC9 cells. (a,b) GLI1 and miR‐873 expression were assessed by quantitative real‐time PCR. Glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and U6 were used as internal controls. *P < 0.01 vs. BEAS‐2B cells. The correlation between between GLI1 and miR‐873 expression was determined in (c) PC‐9 and (d) PC‐9/GR cells. (e) The inhibition rate of gefitinib in the presence of miR‐873 I (miR‐873 inhibitor). mRNA, messenger RNA.

miR‐873 expression was negatively correlated with GLI1 expression in PC9 cells. (a,b) GLI1 and miR‐873 expression were assessed by quantitative real‐time PCR. Glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and U6 were used as internal controls. *P < 0.01 vs. BEAS‐2B cells. The correlation between between GLI1 and miR‐873 expression was determined in (c) PC‐9 and (d) PC‐9/GR cells. (e) The inhibition rate of gefitinib in the presence of miR‐873 I (miR‐873 inhibitor). mRNA, messenger RNA.

GLI1 is a target gene of miR‐873

The qRT‐PCR data revealed that miR‐873 expression was obviously decreased when PC9 cells were transfected with the miR‐873 inhibitor (P < 0.05) (Fig 2a). GLI1 mRNA and protein expression were obviously upregulated when PC9 cells were administered an miR‐873 inhibitor (P < 0.05) (Fig 2b,c). Data from the miRanda and Targetscan websites predicted the binding site of miR‐873 on the GLI1 gene. There is a potential binding site in the 3’UTR region of the GLI1 gene (Fig 2d). Additionally, luciferase activity report assay findings showed that the relative luciferase activity of GLI1–3’UTR was markedly decreased in the presence of miR‐873. However, the relative luciferase activity of GLI1–3’UTR mut was not altered by miR‐873 (P < 0.05) (Fig 2e).
Figure 2

GLI1 was a potential target gene of miR‐873. (a) miR‐873 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression was evaluated by quantitative real‐time (qRT)‐PCR. qRT‐PCR and Western blot assays were performed to assess GLI1 (b) mRNA and (c) protein levels. *P < 0.01 versus control; **P < 0.01 versus mock. (d) The binding site of GLI1 to miR‐873 was predicted. The GLI1 3’ untranslated region (UTR)‐mutant (mut) is presented. (e) The 3’UTR of GLI1 with affinity for miR‐873 and a mutant reporter were cloned to the downstream of firefly luciferase of psiCHECK‐2 vector. miR‐873 was transfected into HEK293T cells. Luciferase activity was examined. *P < 0.01 versus GLI1 3’UTR; **P < 0.01 miR‐873 + GLI1–3’UTR + mut. NS, not significant.

GLI1 was a potential target gene of miR‐873. (a) miR‐873 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression was evaluated by quantitative real‐time (qRT)‐PCR. qRT‐PCR and Western blot assays were performed to assess GLI1 (b) mRNA and (c) protein levels. *P < 0.01 versus control; **P < 0.01 versus mock. (d) The binding site of GLI1 to miR‐873 was predicted. The GLI1 3’ untranslated region (UTR)‐mutant (mut) is presented. (e) The 3’UTR of GLI1 with affinity for miR‐873 and a mutant reporter were cloned to the downstream of firefly luciferase of psiCHECK‐2 vector. miR‐873 was transfected into HEK293T cells. Luciferase activity was examined. *P < 0.01 versus GLI1 3’UTR; **P < 0.01 miR‐873 + GLI1–3’UTR + mut. NS, not significant.

Effect of miR‐873 on cell viability, proliferation, and angiogenesis

The expression of miR‐873 was decreased in cells treated with gefitinib or miR‐873 inhibitors. The combination of gefitinib and miR‐873 inhibitors further decreased the expression of miR‐873 (Fig 3). As CCK‐8 data shows, gefitinib predominantly decreased cell viability at 72 and 144 hours. Cell viability was notably increased in cells treated with miR‐873 inhibitor and gefitinib compared to gefitinib or mock (P < 0.05) (Fig 4a). Angiogenic analysis revealed that gefitinib reduced tube formation. Tube formation was drastically augmented by the miR‐873 inhibitor (P < 0.05) (Fig 4b,c). Meanwhile, flow cytometry data revealed a decrease in cell numbers in cells administered gefitinib, but an increase in cell numbers in cells exposed to miR‐873 inhibitor and gefitinib (P < 0.05) (Fig 4d).
Figure 3

MiR‐873 expression was detected by quantitative real‐time (qRT)‐PCR. PC9 cells were exposed to miR‐873 inhibitor, empty vector (mock), and 40 nM gefitinib for 48, 72, and 144 hours. *P < 0.05.

Figure 4

MiR‐873 inhibition increased the proliferation and angiogenesis of PC9 cells inhibited by gefitinib. (a) PC9 cells were exposed to miR‐873 inhibitor, empty vector (mock), and 40 nM gefitinib for 48, 72, and 144 hours. Cell viability was evaluated by cell counting kit‐8. (b,c) Tube formation of PC9 cells was analyzed using angiogenic analysis. (d) Cell proliferation was determined by flow cytometry. *P < 0.01 versus control. **P < 0.01 gefitinib or mock. NS, not significant.

MiR‐873 expression was detected by quantitative real‐time (qRT)‐PCR. PC9 cells were exposed to miR‐873 inhibitor, empty vector (mock), and 40 nM gefitinib for 48, 72, and 144 hours. *P < 0.05. MiR‐873 inhibition increased the proliferation and angiogenesis of PC9 cells inhibited by gefitinib. (a) PC9 cells were exposed to miR‐873 inhibitor, empty vector (mock), and 40 nM gefitinib for 48, 72, and 144 hours. Cell viability was evaluated by cell counting kit‐8. (b,c) Tube formation of PC9 cells was analyzed using angiogenic analysis. (d) Cell proliferation was determined by flow cytometry. *P < 0.01 versus control. **P < 0.01 gefitinib or mock. NS, not significant.

Repression of miR‐873 enhanced GLI1 expression in PC9 cells

Western blot and qRT‐PCR were used to determine the molecular mechanism of miR‐873 on PC9 cells. As qRT‐PCR shows, gefitinib conspicuously upregulated the mRNA level of GLI1. When cells were exposed to the miR‐873 inhibitor and gefitinib, the GLI1 mRNA level was enhanced compared to gefitinib or mock (P < 0.05) (Fig 5a). The protein trend of GLI1 was also increased by miR‐873 inhibitor and gefitinib compared to gefitinib or mock (P < 0.05) (Fig 5b,c). GLI1 knockdown increased the sensitivity of PC9 to gefitinib. Our data also revealed that downregulation of GLI1 promoted apoptosis in PC9 cells compared to gefitinib treatment alone (P < 0.05) (Fig 6), indicating that inhibition of GLI1 improved the effectiveness of gefitinib in PC9 cells.
Figure 5

miR‐873 inhibition enhanced GLI1 expression in PC9 cells. (a,b) Messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein levels of GLI1 were identified using (a) quantitative real‐time PCR and (b) Western blot assays. *P < 0.01 versus control; **P < 0.01 gefitinib or mock. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase; NS, not significant.

Figure 6

Downregulation of GLI1 enhanced cell sensitivity to gefitinib. PC9 cells were exposed to 40 nM gefitinib, gefitinib + small interfering (si)RNA negative control (NC), and gefitinib+siGLI1; untreated cells were considered the control. Cell apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry assay. *P < 0.05.

miR‐873 inhibition enhanced GLI1 expression in PC9 cells. (a,b) Messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein levels of GLI1 were identified using (a) quantitative real‐time PCR and (b) Western blot assays. *P < 0.01 versus control; **P < 0.01 gefitinib or mock. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase; NS, not significant. Downregulation of GLI1 enhanced cell sensitivity to gefitinib. PC9 cells were exposed to 40 nM gefitinib, gefitinib + small interfering (si)RNA negative control (NC), and gefitinib+siGLI1; untreated cells were considered the control. Cell apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry assay. *P < 0.05.

Discussion

In the present study, GLI1 was identified as a potential target gene for miR‐873 in NSCLC according to data from the miRanda and Targetscan websites. MiR‐873 and GLI1 expression has a negative correlation in NSCLC cells (PC9) highly sensitive to EGFR‐TKIs. Relative luciferase activity was markedly enhanced in PC9 cells treated with miR‐873 inhibitor and GLI‐3’UTR. Suppression of miR‐873 significantly enhanced the viability, angiogenesis, and proliferation of PC9 cells inhibited by gefitinib, followed by upregulation of GLI1. The Hh signaling pathway is highly activated in NSCLC.32, 33, 34 GLI1 is the transcription factor of the Hh signaling pathway and its downstream target gene. Its expression is highly dependent on the activity of the Hh signal and is often used as a marker for activation of the Hh signaling pathway.35, 36 Furthermore, Gao et al. proved that miR‐873 inhibits the progression of lung adenocarcinoma.37 Zhang et al. confirmed that miR‐873 represses H9C2 cell proliferation by regulating GLI1.31 Thus, we hypothesized that miR‐873 and GLI1 may be linked in NSCLC. As expected, we found that GLI1 is a target gene of miR‐873 in NSCLC. In addition, there is a negative correlation between miR‐873 and GLI1 expression in PC9 cells. MiR‐873 inhibition markedly promoted the expression of GLI1. Luciferase activity was increased in PC9 cells exposed to miR‐873 and GLI‐3’UTR, thus miR‐873 and GLI1 were selected as research objects. Gefitinib, an EGFR‐TKI, is the first targeted drug to treat advanced‐stage NSCLC.38, 39, 40 Our data showed that gefitinib reduces cell viability and proliferation in PC9 cells. Angiogenesis was also inhibited by gefitinib. However, gefitinib will develop resistance in cancer during its application. Recently, a large number of articles have reported gefitinib resistance in NSCLC cells.40, 41, 42 Herein, we explored the role of miR‐873 in gefitinib resistance in PC9 cells. It is well known that the development of neovascularization is a necessary condition for tumor growth and metastasis.43, 44 The unrestricted growth, invasion, and metastasis of the tumor are dependent on angiogenesis. Meanwhile, neovascularization provides nutrients for the growth of the tumor and is also an important method to excrete tumor cells. During angiogenesis, tumor growth changes from slow to rapid; angiogenesis is the key step to facilitate this transformation. Inhibition of angiogenesis can obviously control tumor growth and metastasis.45, 46, 47, 48, 49 In this study, we found that miR‐873 suppression conspicuously enhanced the viability and growth of PC9 cells treated with gefitinib. Moreover, the inhibition of miR‐873 increased angiogenesis. These findings suggest that miR‐873 repression heightens gefitinib resistance in NSCLC cells. Xie et al. reported that a decrease in RKIP increases radioresistance in NSCLC cells by regulating GLI1 signaling.50 Bora‐Singhal et al. reported that silence of GLI1 combined with EGFR inhibitors obviously attenuates the growth of NSCLC cells.51 In our study, we observed that miR‐873 drastically enhanced the level of GLI1 in PC9 cells. Moreover, GLI1 downregulation enhanced apoptosis of PC9 cells, caused by gefitinib. These results imply that the inhibition of miR‐873 exerted in PC9 cells is more likely related to upregulation of GLI1. GLI1 is a target gene of miR‐873 in NSCLC. Suppression of miR‐873 accelerated the viability, angiogenesis, and proliferation of PC9 cells suppressed by gefitinib. MiR‐873 suppression strengthened gefitinib resistance in NSCLC cells by upregulating GLI1. These results prove that miR‐873‐GLI1 signaling is involved in gefitinib resistance in NSCLC. How to control drug resistance in NSCLC requires further research.

Disclosure

No authors report any conflict of interest.
  51 in total

Review 1.  Ligand-triggered resistance to molecular targeted drugs in lung cancer: roles of hepatocyte growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor ligands.

Authors:  Seiji Yano; Shinji Takeuchi; Takayuki Nakagawa; Tadaaki Yamada
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 6.716

2.  A feasibility study of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine S-1 in patients with stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tsuboi; Kazuya Kondo; Hiromitsu Takizawa; Naoya Kawakita; Toru Sawada; Hiroaki Toba; Yukikiyo Kawakami; Mitsuteru Yoshida; Hisashi Ishikura; Suguru Kimura; Akira Tangoku
Journal:  J Med Invest       Date:  2018

3.  MicroRNA-873 mediates multidrug resistance in ovarian cancer cells by targeting ABCB1.

Authors:  Di-di Wu; Xue-Song Li; Xiao-Na Meng; Jing Yan; Zhi-Hong Zong
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-02-05

Review 4.  Treatments for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): The road to a success, paved with failures.

Authors:  Dae Ho Lee
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 12.310

5.  Acneiform eruption induced by Iressa (gefitinib) tablets used to treat non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Molly M Warthan; Cynthia A Jumper; Jennifer L Smith
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.114

6.  MicroRNA-630 may confer favorable cisplatin-based chemotherapy and clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer by targeting Bcl-2.

Authors:  Ming-Jenn Chen; De-Wei Wu; Gao-Chang Wang; Yao-Chen Wang; Chi-Yi Chen; Huei Lee
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-02-09

Review 7.  Functional miRNAs in breast cancer drug resistance.

Authors:  Weizi Hu; Chunli Tan; Yunjie He; Guangqin Zhang; Yong Xu; Jinhai Tang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Prediction of sensitivity to gefitinib/erlotinib for EGFR mutations in NSCLC based on structural interaction fingerprints and multilinear principal component analysis.

Authors:  Bin Zou; Victor H F Lee; Hong Yan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Impact of Weight Loss at Presentation on Survival in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) Sensitive Mutant Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated with First-line EGFR-TKI.

Authors:  Liping Lin; Juanjuan Zhao; Jiazhu Hu; Fuxi Huang; Jianjun Han; Yan He; Xiaolong Cao
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  ERK inhibition represses gefitinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Mengfan Qi; Ye Tian; Wang Li; Dan Li; Tian Zhao; Yuxin Yang; Qiwen Li; Sujun Chen; Yan Yang; Zhixiong Zhang; Liang Tang; Zhonghua Liu; Bo Su; Fei Li; Yonghong Feng; Ke Fei; Peng Zhang; Fan Zhang; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-10
View more
  7 in total

1.  Relationship between long non-coding RNA PCAT-1 expression and gefitinib resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Shaojia Wang; Chao Liu; Qing Lei; Zhengwei Wu; Xiangshuai Miao; Debing Zhu; Xu Yang; Na Li; Mingwei Tang; Yan Chen; Weiwei Wang
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2021-05-12

2.  MicroRNA-873 inhibits the proliferation and invasion of endometrial cancer cells by directly targeting hepatoma-derived growth factor.

Authors:  Qin Wang; Weipei Zhu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.751

3.  MicroRNA-873 serves a critical role in human cervical cancer proliferation and metastasis via regulating glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1.

Authors:  Juan Feng; Tingfeng Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  MicroRNAs as the critical regulators of tyrosine kinase inhibitors resistance in lung tumor cells.

Authors:  Amirhosein Maharati; Amir Sadra Zanguei; Ghazaleh Khalili-Tanha; Meysam Moghbeli
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.712

5.  Identification of immune-related ferroptosis prognostic marker and in-depth bioinformatics exploration of multi-omics mechanisms in thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Xin Fan; Fei Xie; Lingling Zhang; Chang Tong; Zhiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-08-17

6.  miR-873-5p Inhibits Cell Migration and Invasion of Papillary Thyroid Cancer via Regulation of CXCL16.

Authors:  Zhenglin Wang; Wei Liu; Cong Wang; Zhilong Ai
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Targeting Autophagy for Overcoming Resistance to Anti-EGFR Treatments.

Authors:  Yoojung Kwon; Misun Kim; Hyun Suk Jung; Youngmi Kim; Dooil Jeoung
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.