Literature DB >> 30125107

Hydration Free Energies in the FreeSolv Database Calculated with Polarized Iterative Hirshfeld Charges.

Maximiliano Riquelme1, Alejandro Lara1, David L Mobley2, Toon Verstraelen3, Adelio R Matamala1, Esteban Vöhringer-Martinez1.   

Abstract

Computer simulations of biomolecular systems often use force fields, which are combinations of simple empirical atom-based functions to describe the molecular interactions. Even though polarizable force fields give a more detailed description of intermolecular interactions, nonpolarizable force fields, developed several decades ago, are often still preferred because of their reduced computation cost. Electrostatic interactions play a major role in biomolecular systems and are therein described by atomic point charges. In this work, we address the performance of different atomic charges to reproduce experimental hydration free energies in the FreeSolv database in combination with the GAFF force field. Atomic charges were calculated by two atoms-in-molecules approaches, Hirshfeld-I and Minimal Basis Iterative Stockholder (MBIS). To account for polarization effects, the charges were derived from the solute's electron density computed with an implicit solvent model, and the energy required to polarize the solute was added to the free energy cycle. The calculated hydration free energies were analyzed with an error model, revealing systematic errors associated with specific functional groups or chemical elements. The best agreement with the experimental data is observed for the AM1-BCC and the MBIS atomic charge methods. The latter includes the solvent polarization and presents a root-mean-square error of 2.0 kcal mol-1 for the 613 organic molecules studied. The largest deviation was observed for phosphorus-containing molecules and the molecules with amide, ester and amine functional groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30125107      PMCID: PMC6195221          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  56 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Critical analysis and extension of the Hirshfeld atoms in molecules.

Authors:  Patrick Bultinck; Christian Van Alsenoy; Paul W Ayers; Ramon Carbó-Dorca
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Accurate and efficient corrections for missing dispersion interactions in molecular simulations.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Hydrophilicity of polar amino acid side-chains is markedly reduced by flanking peptide bonds.

Authors:  M A Roseman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1988-04-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Information-Theoretic Approaches to Atoms-in-Molecules: Hirshfeld Family of Partitioning Schemes.

Authors:  Farnaz Heidar-Zadeh; Paul W Ayers; Toon Verstraelen; Ivan Vinogradov; Esteban Vöhringer-Martinez; Patrick Bultinck
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  C6 Coefficients and Dipole Polarizabilities for All Atoms and Many Ions in Rows 1-6 of the Periodic Table.

Authors:  Tim Gould; Tomáš Bučko
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Derivation of fixed partial charges for amino acids accommodating a specific water model and implicit polarization.

Authors:  David S Cerutti; Julia E Rice; William C Swope; David A Case
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  General Model for Treating Short-Range Electrostatic Penetration in a Molecular Mechanics Force Field.

Authors:  Qiantao Wang; Joshua A Rackers; Chenfeng He; Rui Qi; Christophe Narth; Louis Lagardere; Nohad Gresh; Jay W Ponder; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  5 in total

1.  Theoretical investigation complexation characteristics and UV-Vis absorption spectral properties of CdTe QDs with four capping agents.

Authors:  Qinghong Yang; Xujiang Wan; Yang Chen; Hui Luo; Yan Zheng; Laicai Li
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  In Silico Analysis of the Antagonist Effect of Enoxaparin on the ApoE4-Amyloid-Beta (Aβ) Complex at Different pH Conditions.

Authors:  Jorge Alberto Aguilar-Pineda; Silvana G Paco-Coralla; Camilo Febres-Molina; Pamela L Gamero-Begazo; Pallavi Shrivastava; Karin J Vera-López; Gonzalo Davila-Del-Carpio; Patricia López-C; Badhin Gómez; Christian L Lino Cardenas
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-03-25

3.  SAMPL6 Octanol-water partition coefficients from alchemical free energy calculations with MBIS atomic charges.

Authors:  Maximiliano Riquelme; Esteban Vöhringer-Martinez
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Simulating protein-ligand binding with neural network potentials.

Authors:  Shae-Lynn J Lahey; Christopher N Rowley
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 9.825

5.  A Simple Method for Including Polarization Effects in Solvation Free Energy Calculations When Using Fixed-Charge Force Fields: Alchemically Polarized Charges.

Authors:  Braden D Kelly; William R Smith
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-07-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.