Literature DB >> 30124886

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in non-targeted lung tissues of Kunming mice exposed to X-rays is suppressed by celecoxib.

Wentao Hu1,2, Hailong Pei1,2, Fang Sun3, Pengfei Li3, Jing Nie1,2, Bingyan Li4, Tom K Hei5, Guangming Zhou1,2.   

Abstract

Lung cancer is one of the highest health risks caused by ionizing radiation, which induces both direct effects and non-targeted effects. However, whether radiation-induced non-targeted effects result in epithelial-mesenchymal transition, a critical process during tumorigenesis, in non-targeted lung tissues remains unknown. In the present study, Kunming mice were subjected to whole-body, cranial or local abdominal irradiation of single-dose or fractionated 4 Gy X-rays, and the expressions of epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers in non-targeted lung tissues were assessed by both qRT-PCR and immunofluorescent staining. It was found that the epithelial marker was downregulated while the mesenchymal markers were upregulated significantly in non-targeted lung tissues of the irradiated mice. Local abdominal irradiation was more efficient in inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition than whole-body or cranial irradiation when the fractionated irradiation method was adopted. In addition, the intraperitoneal administration of celecoxib suppressed epithelial-mesenchymal transition in the non-targeted lung tissues. In conclusion, our findings suggest that epithelial-mesenchymal transition is induced in non-targeted lung tissues, but can be suppressed by inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 by celecoxib.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30124886      PMCID: PMC6151633          DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rry050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


INTRODUCTION

The dogma that the radiobiological effects are restricted to the cells directly targeted by ionizing radiation (IR) has been challenged by the discovery of the radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE), which suggests that the cells in close proximity to the directly irradiated cells can manifest various kinds of biological effects, including transformation, chromosomal aberrations, apoptosis, etc. [1]. Up till now, most knowledge about RIBE comes from the conventional in vitro cell culture system. It has been identified that both gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) and soluble factors generated by directly hit cells play important roles in the RIBE in cell cultures [2]. However, in vivo studies about RIBE/non-targeted effects are limited, which has important implications for both the precise assessment of radiation risk and the accurate evaluation of existing radiotherapy models. It has been found by several researchers that the RIBE exists in both 3D human tissue models and animal models, with endpoints including DNA damage, gene expression dysregulation, cell death, tumorigenesis, etc. [3-6]. The RIBE can also be considered as abscopal effects in clinical radiotherapy and contributes to secondary carcinogenesis [7]. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), an important process through which epithelial cells transform into mesenchymal cells, is involved in development, inflammation, tumorigenesis, tumor development, and metastasis, etc. [8, 9]. It was found that overexpression of EMT-related transcriptional factors in mammary epithelial cells induced EMT and resulted in both the acquisition of mesenchymal traits and expression of stem cell markers, which hinted that EMT functions in the early stage of tumorigenesis [10]. However, whether the RIBE plays a role in the induction of EMT in non-targeted tissues remains unknown. It has been reported that the lung was the second-most common cancer site among the atomic bomb survivors, and lung cancer accounted for 10.9% of all solid cancer cases [11]. However, the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. In addition, lung cancer shows one of the highest morbidities and mortalities of all kinds of cancers throughout the world [12-14]. Since most lung cancer patients need to be treated with radiotherapy, the potential for a second carcinogenesis in non-targeted tissues induced by radiotherapy cannot be ignored. It was found that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) was significantly upregulated in non-targeted lung tissues, and that inhibition of COX-2 by Nimesulide reduced the RIBE-induced oxidative DNA damage, implying that it may be a target for inhibition of the RIBE in lung tissues [15]. In this study, to investigate whether EMT was induced in non-targeted lung tissues in vivo, we examined expression of the EMT marker genes in the non-targeted lung tissues of mice receiving partial body irradiation, and determined the inhibitory effect of celecoxib (a specific inhibitor of COX-2) on EMT, in the hope of revealing the role of the RIBE in radiation-induced tumorigenesis in lung cancer, as well as of developing the related countermeasures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal and irradiation treatment

Male Kunming mice (4–5 weeks old), housed in a virus-free facility and given food and water ad libitum, were randomly divided into several groups according to different treatments. Each group consisted of ten animals. Animals were subjected to either whole-body irradiation (WBIR), cranial irradiation (CIR) or local abdominal irradiation (LAIR) of 4 Gy X-rays by using a cabinet X-ray generator (Faxitron, Wheeling, IL, USA) operated at 100 kVp and 5 mA with a dose rate of 1.2 Gy/min. The thickness of the beryllium filter used in the X-ray generator was 0.25 mm. All X-ray irradiations were conducted either by single-dose irradiation of 4 Gy or fractionated irradiation of 0.5 Gy/day for 8 consecutive days. Celecoxib (Pfizer, New York, NY, USA), dissolved in sterile 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and saline solution was freshly prepared on the day of each experiment and administrated intraperitoneally at a dose of 20 mg/kg/day for 5 consecutive days immediately before exposure. All animals of irradiation groups, anaesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 3.5% chloral hydrate (5 ml/kg) before irradiation, were fixed for either CIR or LAIR, and a set of 4-mm-thick lead shields were laid upon the animals in a manner allowing only the needed areas to be exposed. As for LAIR, a 1-cm2 (1 cm × 1 cm) area of the lower abdomen of the mouse was chosen and subjected to irradiation (Fig. 1). The protection of shielded tissues was successful (0.61 mGy/min under the 4-mm-thick lead shields), as verified by radiation dosimetry using a calibrated semiconductor dosimeter (PTW-DIADOS, Freiburg, Germany). To measure whether scattering contributed to the EMT observed in the bystander tissues, a Monte Carlo simulation was employed to determine the scatter radiation dose resulting from X-ray scattering within the mouse itself. The absorbed dose to the lung tissues after LAIR with a single 4 Gy dose of 100 kVp X-rays was estimated to be ~5.3 mGy. Thus WBIR with 5.3 mGy of X-rays was used as a scatter radiation control in another cohort of 10 male Kunming mice. Animals were euthanized at 48 h after irradiation. All animal studies were reviewed and approved by the Soochow University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and performed in compliance with the institutional regulations and guidelines for the welfare and use of animals in cancer research [16].
Fig. 1.

Sketch of the cranial irradiation (CIR) and local abdominal irradiation (LAIR) set-ups of the mice. (A) CIR set-up. A 4-mm-thick lead shield was used to cover the mouse body except the head. (B) LAIR set-up. A 1-cm2 (1 cm × 1 cm) area of the lower abdomen of the mouse was irradiated with 4 Gy of X-rays. A set of 4-mm-thick lead shields were used to cover the mouse body in a manner that allowed only the needed area to be exposed.

Sketch of the cranial irradiation (CIR) and local abdominal irradiation (LAIR) set-ups of the mice. (A) CIR set-up. A 4-mm-thick lead shield was used to cover the mouse body except the head. (B) LAIR set-up. A 1-cm2 (1 cm × 1 cm) area of the lower abdomen of the mouse was irradiated with 4 Gy of X-rays. A set of 4-mm-thick lead shields were used to cover the mouse body in a manner that allowed only the needed area to be exposed.

qRT-PCR analysis

At 48 h post-irradiation, mice were euthanized for lung tissue collection without perfusion. Total RNA extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was quantified by NanoDrop™ ND-2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and reverse-transcribed (RT) using an All-in-One™ First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (GeneCopoeia, Rockville, MD, USA). The real-time PCR analysis was carried out using a SYBR Premix Ex Taq II Kit (Takara, Japan) on a Chromo4 Real-Time PCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The expression levels of mRNAs were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and analyzed with the C(t) value comparison method.

Immunofluorescent staining

Lung tissues were submerged in Tissue Freezing Medium (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and frozen at −80°C before frozen section production. The frozen tissues were cut into 5 μm sections, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, then permeabilized in 0.5% Triton-X 100 for 1 min. After blocking with 5% milk for 1 h, slides were incubated with a mixture of antibodies against E-cadherin and Vimentin (CST Biotech, Danvers, MA, USA) for 2 h at room temperature. After three washes with 1 × phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), slides were incubated with a mixture of Alexa Fluor® 594 anti-mouse IgG and Alexa Fluor® 488 anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. After another three washes with 1 × PBS, DAPI mounting medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used for nuclear staining. Slides were then examined under an Olympus FV1000 laser scanning confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The immunofluorescence assay was conducted in the lung tissues from at least three mice from each group.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as means ± SE. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test between the indicated groups. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

To determine whether WBIR, CIR or LAIR was capable of inducing EMT in non-targeted lung tissues of mice exposed to single-dose or fractionated irradiation, lung tissues of the irradiated mice were collected 48 h post-irradiation and the expressions of several EMT marker genes were examined by both qRT-PCR and immunofluorescent staining. Relative transcript expression levels of EMT markers (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Fibronectin and Vimentin) in non-targeted lung tissues were determined by qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 2, all three kinds of exposure methods were found to be able to induce significant expression changes of EMT markers in non-targeted lung tissues of the irradiated mice. The epithelial marker E-cadherin was downregulated significantly, while the mesenchymal markers, N-cadherin, Fibronectin, and Vimentin, were upregulated significantly (P < 0.05). While whole-body exposure to 5.3 mGy of X-rays did not result in downregulated E-cadherin or upregulated mesenchymal markers (Supplementary Fig. 1), indicating that the observed changes in the expressions of EMT markers were not likely to be caused by scatter radiation. It was also found that all three exposure methods had comparable abilities to induce EMT when the single-dose irradiation method was adopted. LAIR was more efficient in inducing the downregulation of E-cadherin in non-targeted lung tissues than WBIR or CIR when the fractionated irradiation method was used. In addition, COX-2 expression was upregulated significantly in the non-targeted lung tissues of the irradiated mice with both exposure methods (Supplementary Fig. 2). The administration of celecoxib significantly suppressed the expression changes of EMT markers, as well as COX-2, in non-targeted lung tissues of the irradiated mice (P < 0.05), regardless of the exposure method or dose delivery method (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 2). Though the induced upregulation of Vimentin was decreased significantly by the celecoxib administration when both dose delivery methods were used (P < 0.05), it didn’t recover to the control level. The other three EMT markers (E-cadherin, N-cadherin and Fibronectin) recovered to the control levels in irradiated mice with celecoxib administration (no significant difference from the control levels).
Fig. 2.

Relative expression levels of the mRNAs encoding E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Fibronectin and Vimentin in non-targeted lung tissues of the irradiated mice, as determined by qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR analysis of relative transcript levels of E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Fibronectin and Vimentin in non-targeted lung tissues of the mice subjected to single-dose (A) or fractionated (B) irradiation of 4 Gy X-rays with or without administration of celecoxib. Asterisks indicate statistical significance relative to the non-irradiated control group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.

Relative expression levels of the mRNAs encoding E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Fibronectin and Vimentin in non-targeted lung tissues of the irradiated mice, as determined by qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR analysis of relative transcript levels of E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Fibronectin and Vimentin in non-targeted lung tissues of the mice subjected to single-dose (A) or fractionated (B) irradiation of 4 Gy X-rays with or without administration of celecoxib. Asterisks indicate statistical significance relative to the non-irradiated control group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. Similar results were obtained in the immunofluorescent staining assays of E-cadherin and Vimentin. E-cadherin was reduced while Vimentin was induced in non-targeted lung tissues of irradiated mice. Celecoxib administration increased the expression of E-cadherin, but it suppressed the upregulation of Vimentin (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

Immunofluorescent staining assays of E-cadherin and Vimentin expressions in sections of non-targeted lung tissues of the irradiated mice. Sections were observed under an Olympus FV1000 laser scanning confocal microscope and images were acquired (original magnification, ×100). Blue = 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI); red = Alexa Fluor® 594 conjugated to anti-E-cadherin; green = Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugated to anti-Vimentin.

Immunofluorescent staining assays of E-cadherin and Vimentin expressions in sections of non-targeted lung tissues of the irradiated mice. Sections were observed under an Olympus FV1000 laser scanning confocal microscope and images were acquired (original magnification, ×100). Blue = 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI); red = Alexa Fluor® 594 conjugated to anti-E-cadherin; green = Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugated to anti-Vimentin.

DISCUSSION

Millions of people die from lung cancer every year, for which radiotherapy is one of the main treatments. It is estimated that 75% of patients with non–small cell lung cancer need to be treated with radiotherapy [17, 18]. In addition to the beneficial effects of radiotherapy, several side effects threatening normal tissues of patients after treatment need to be considered, especially the high incidences of second primary cancers [19]. It has been suggested that ~8% of secondary solid tumors could be attributed to radiotherapy, though the estimate varies by tumor type [20]. The RIBE/non-targeted effect, referring to a complicated response in non-irradiated cells caused by the release of clastogenic factors from irradiated cells, is thought to be associated with secondary cancers following radiotherapy. Most of the RIBE reports derived from previous in vitro studies didn’t consider the microenvironment and immune response as playing essential roles in carcinogenesis. An in vivo RIBE has been found in various tissues and organs of animals [21]. However, it has not been determined whether EMT plays a role in RIBE-induced tumorigenesis in vivo, EMT has been shown to be a key process in the tumorigenesis and development of various kinds of cancer [22]. In this study, we found that expression changes of EMT markers were significantly induced in the non-targeted lung tissues of the mice subjected to either CIR or LAIR, suggesting EMT may be an early step in the lung tumorigenesis induced by the in vivo non-targeted effect. In addition, inhibition of COX-2 by celecoxib suppressed the RIBE-induced expression changes of EMT markers in lung tissues. COX-2 is a key enzyme catalyzing the metabolism of arachidonic acid into prostaglandins and finally contributes to cellular inflammation and carcinogenesis, also involved in RIBE, both in vitro and in vivo [23, 24]. Increased COX-2 expression and/or activation in distant non-targeted tissues will cause oxidative DNA damage and elevated cancer risk [25]. It has been found that COX-2 plays a key role in EMT of cancer cells. Hepatocyte growth factor promoted carcinogenesis and EMT in hepatocellular carcinoma via the COX-2 pathway [26]. Sulforaphane inhibited EMT via the COX-2/MMP2,9/ZEB1 pathway in human bladder cancer cells [27]. Xian et al. also reported that WIN could inhibit the EMT of gastric cancer cells through downregulation of COX-2 [28]. However, it hasn’t been figured out whether COX-2 plays a role in the EMT as well as carcinogenesis in non-targeted tissues of mice exposed to ionizing radiation, which is of significance for the understanding of the mechanisms underlying the radiotherapy-induced secondary cancer risk. In our study, the inhibition of COX-2 by celecoxib suppressed the RIBE-induced EMT in non-irradiated lung tissues, implying that RIBE-induced EMT in non-targeted lung tissues depends on COX-2, and inhibition of COX-2 is promising in reducing the secondary cancer risk induced by radiotherapy. Moreover, it was found that LAIR was more efficient in inducing EMT of non-targeted lung tissues compared with WBIR or CIR in mice exposed to fractionated irradiation, implying that the lower abdomen is crucial in the induction of non-targeted effects in vivo, and non-targeted effects depends on the type of irradiated organs. However, the underlying mechanisms are yet to be further elucidated. In conclusion, the present work indicates that the expression changes of EMT markers are induced by non-targeted effects in abscopal lung tissues, and inhibition of COX-2 exerts a suppressive function, which are of great significance in the mechanistic studies of lung tumorigenesis induced by RIBE, as well as in the assessment of cancer risks related to accidental and clinical exposures to radiation. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  27 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  Radiation-induced bystander effect: early process and rapid assessment.

Authors:  Hongzhi Wang; K N Yu; Jue Hou; Qian Liu; Wei Han
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 3.  Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT): A biological process in the development, stem cell differentiation, and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Tong Chen; Yanan You; Hua Jiang; Zack Z Wang
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Abscopal effect of low-LET γ-radiation mediated through Rel protein signal transduction in a mouse model of nontargeted radiation response.

Authors:  S Aravindan; M Natarajan; S K Ramraj; V Pandian; F H Khan; T S Herman; N Aravindan
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 5.987

Review 5.  Risk of second cancer following radiotherapy.

Authors:  Iuliana Toma-Dasu; Andrzej Wojcik; Emely Kjellsson Lindblom
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  A Mouse Ear Model for Bystander Studies Induced by Microbeam Irradiation.

Authors:  M Buonanno; G Randers-Pehrson; L B Smilenov; N J Kleiman; E Young; B Ponnayia; D J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Guidelines for the welfare and use of animals in cancer research.

Authors:  P Workman; E O Aboagye; F Balkwill; A Balmain; G Bruder; D J Chaplin; J A Double; J Everitt; D A H Farningham; M J Glennie; L R Kelland; V Robinson; I J Stratford; G M Tozer; S Watson; S R Wedge; S A Eccles
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, a novel target of sulforaphane via COX-2/MMP2, 9/Snail, ZEB1 and miR-200c/ZEB1 pathways in human bladder cancer cells.

Authors:  Yujuan Shan; Lanwei Zhang; Yongping Bao; Baolong Li; Canxia He; Mingming Gao; Xue Feng; Weili Xu; Xiaohong Zhang; Shuran Wang
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 9.  Molecular regulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in tumorigenesis (Review).

Authors:  Henrieta Škovierová; Terézia Okajčeková; Ján Strnádel; Eva Vidomanová; Erika Halašová
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.101

10.  Radiation induced COX-2 expression and mutagenesis at non-targeted lung tissues of gpt delta transgenic mice.

Authors:  Y Chai; G M Calaf; H Zhou; S A Ghandhi; C D Elliston; G Wen; T Nohmi; S A Amundson; T K Hei
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Semiconducting polymer nano-radiopharmaceutical for combined radio-photothermal therapy of pancreatic tumor.

Authors:  Xiumin Shi; Qing Li; Chuan Zhang; Hailong Pei; Guanglin Wang; Hui Zhou; Longfei Fan; Kai Yang; Bo Jiang; Feng Wang; Ran Zhu
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 10.435

2.  Celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, markedly reduced the severity of tamoxifen-induced adenomyosis in a murine model.

Authors:  Zhixing Jin; Xiaoyi Wu; Haiou Liu; Congjian Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.447

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.