Literature DB >> 28319463

Solid Cancer Incidence among the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958-2009.

Eric J Grant1, Alina Brenner2, Hiromi Sugiyama1, Ritsu Sakata1, Atsuko Sadakane1, Mai Utada1, Elizabeth K Cahoon2, Caitlin M Milder3, Midori Soda1, Harry M Cullings4, Dale L Preston5, Kiyohiko Mabuchi2, Kotaro Ozasa1.   

Abstract

This is the third analysis of solid cancer incidence among the Life Span Study (LSS) cohort of atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, adding eleven years of follow-up data since the previously reported analysis. For this analysis, several changes and improvements were implemented, including updated dose estimates (DS02R1) and adjustment for smoking. Here, we focus on all solid cancers in aggregate. The eligible cohort included 105,444 subjects who were alive and had no known history of cancer at the start of follow-up. A total of 80,205 subjects had individual dose estimates and 25,239 were not in either city at the time of the bombings. The follow-up period was 1958-2009, providing 3,079,484 person-years of follow-up. Cases were identified by linkage with population-based Hiroshima and Nagasaki Cancer Registries. Poisson regression methods were used to elucidate the nature of the radiation-associated risks per Gy of weighted absorbed colon dose using both excess relative risk (ERR) and excess absolute risk (EAR) models adjusted for smoking. Risk estimates were reported for a person exposed at age 30 years with attained age of 70 years. In this study, 22,538 incident first primary solid cancer cases were identified, of which 992 were associated with radiation exposure. There were 5,918 cases (26%) that occurred in the 11 years (1999-2009) since the previously reported study. For females, the dose response was consistent with linearity with an estimated ERR of 0.64 per Gy (95% CI: 0.52 to 0.77). For males, significant upward curvature over the full dose range as well as restricted dose ranges was observed and therefore, a linear-quadratic model was used, which resulted in an ERR of 0.20 (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.28) at 1 Gy and an ERR of 0.010 (95% CI: -0.0003 to 0.021) at 0.1 Gy. The shape of the ERR dose response was significantly different among males and females (P = 0.02). While there was a significant decrease in the ERR with increasing attained age, this decrease was more rapid in males compared to females. The lowest dose range that showed a statistically significant dose response using the sex-averaged, linear ERR model was 0-100 mGy (P = 0.038). In conclusion, this analysis demonstrates that solid cancer risks remain elevated more than 60 years after exposure. Sex-averaged upward curvature was observed in the dose response independent of adjustment for smoking. Findings from the current analysis regarding the dose-response shape were not fully consistent with those previously reported, raising unresolved questions. At this time, uncertainties in the shape of the dose response preclude definitive conclusions to confidently guide radiation protection policies. Upcoming results from a series of analyses focusing on the radiation risks for specific organs or organ families, as well as continued follow-up are needed to fully understand the nature of radiation-related cancer risk and its public health significance. Data and analysis scripts are available for download at: http://www.rerf.or.jp .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28319463     DOI: 10.1667/RR14492.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  89 in total

1.  Radiation risk of central nervous system tumors in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors, 1958-2009.

Authors:  Alina V Brenner; Hiromi Sugiyama; Dale L Preston; Ritsu Sakata; Benjamin French; Atsuko Sadakane; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Mai Utada; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Kotaro Ozasa
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Misclassification of primary liver cancer in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Benjamin French; Atsuko Sadakane; John Cologne; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Kotaro Ozasa; Dale L Preston
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  CONVERSION FACTOR FROM DOSEMETER READING TO AIR KERMA FOR NUCLEAR WORKER USING ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOM FOR FURTHER CONVERSION FROM AIR KERMA TO ORGAN-ABSORBED DOSE.

Authors:  Hiroshige Furuta; Norio Tsujimura; Akemi Nishide; Shin'ichi Kudo; Shin Saigusa
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Medical Radiation Exposure among Atomic Bomb Survivors: Understanding its Impact on Risk Estimates of Atomic Bomb Radiation.

Authors:  Atsuko Sadakane; Reid D Landes; Ritsu Sakata; Jun Nagano; Roy E Shore; Kotaro Ozasa
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 5.  Protecting sensitive patient groups from imaging using ionizing radiation: effects during pregnancy, in fetal life and childhood.

Authors:  Paolo Tomà; Alessandra Bartoloni; Sergio Salerno; Claudio Granata; Vittorio Cannatà; Andrea Magistrelli; Owen J Arthurs
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  Issues in Interpreting Epidemiologic Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation.

Authors:  Ethel S Gilbert; Mark P Little; Dale L Preston; Daniel O Stram
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 7.  Pregnancy-associated breast cancer: the risky status quo and new concepts of predictive medicine.

Authors:  Jiri Polivka; Irem Altun; Olga Golubnitschaja
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  Selection of reference groups in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Benjamin French; John Cologne; Ritsu Sakata; Mai Utada; Dale L Preston
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  High CT doses return to the agenda.

Authors:  W Rühm; R M Harrison
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 10.  Dose limits for occupational exposure to ionising radiation and genotoxic carcinogens: a German perspective.

Authors:  Werner Rühm; Joachim Breckow; Günter Dietze; Anna Friedl; Rüdiger Greinert; Peter Jacob; Stephan Kistinger; Rolf Michel; Wolfgang-Ulrich Müller; Heinz Otten; Christian Streffer; Wolfgang Weiss
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.