Literature DB >> 30124798

Transcatheter mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation using the Cardioband system: 1 year outcomes.

David Messika-Zeitoun1,2,3,4, Georg Nickenig5, Azeem Latib6, Karl-Heinz Kuck7, Stephan Baldus8, Robert Schueler5, Giovanni La Canna6, Eustachio Agricola6, Felix Kreidel7, Michael Huntgeburth8, Michel Zuber9, Patrick Verta10, Paul Grayburn11, Alec Vahanian1,2,3, Francesco Maisano9.   

Abstract

Aims: The Cardioband™ (Edwards Lifesciences) is a transcatheter implant designed to reduce mitral annulus size and mitral regurgitation (MR) severity. We report the 1-year outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent the Cardioband procedure between 2013 and 2016. Methods and results: Sixty patients with moderate or severe secondary MR (72 ± 7 years, 60% ischaemic origin) on guideline-recommended medical therapy were treated and analyzed at 11 European institutions. There were two in-hospital deaths (none device-related), one stroke, two coronary artery complications, and one tamponade. Anchor disengagement, observed in 10 patients (all but one in the first half of the population), resulted in device inefficacy in five patients and led to device modification half way through the study to mitigate this issue. Technical, device, and procedural successes, assessed based on Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) criteria, were 97% (58/60), 72% (43/60), and 68% (41/60), respectively. At 1-year, overall survival, survival free of readmission for heart failure, and survival free of reintervention (performed in seven patients) were 87%, 66%, and 78%, respectively. In the overall population, MR grade at 12 months was moderate or less 61% and moderate or less in 95% of the 39 patients who underwent a transthoracic echocardiography at 1-year [but worsened by at least one grade in 11 patients (22%)]. Functional status (79% vs. 14% in New York Heart Association Class I/II), quality of life (-19 points on the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score), and exercise capacity (+58 m by 6MWT) improved significantly (all P < 0.01).
Conclusion: In this multicentre trial, the Cardioband mitral system demonstrated reasonable performance and safety. At 1 year, most patients had moderate or less MR and experienced significant functional improvements. A randomized controlled trial is underway to demonstrate the impact of Cardioband in patients on guideline-directed medical therapy.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30124798     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  26 in total

1.  [Cardioband®: Where do we stand, who are suitable patients?]

Authors:  C Frerker; T Schmidt; R Pfister; M I Körber; V Mauri; M Wösten; S Baldus
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Transcatheter mitral valve repair: review of current techniques.

Authors:  Thilo Noack; Philipp Kiefer; Christian Besler; Philipp Lurz; Sergey Leontyev; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab; David Michael Holzhey; Joerg Seeburger
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-09-10

3.  Transcatheter mitral valve intervention.

Authors:  Rea Ganatra; Robert Smith
Journal:  Br J Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-30

4.  Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Ventriculoplasty: From Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Toby Rogers; Adam B Greenbaum; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Jason R Foerst; Jaffar M Khan; Christopher G Bruce; Annette M Stine; Lowell F Satler; Emily Perdoncin; Patrick T Gleason; John C Lisko; Xin Tian; Rui Miao; Vandana Sachdev; Marcus Y Chen; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 11.075

5.  Mortality and Clinical Predictors After Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.

Authors:  Wence Shi; Wenchang Zhang; Da Zhang; Guojie Ye; Chunhua Ding
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-04

6.  The Year in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia: Selected Highlights from 2019.

Authors:  Adam S Evans; Menachem M Weiner; Shahzad Shaefi; Prakash A Patel; Matthew M Townsley; Abirami Kumaresan; Jared W Feinman; Ashley V Fritz; Archer K Martin; Toby B Steinberg; J Ross Renew; Jane L Gui; Brian Radvansky; Himani Bhatt; Sudhakar Subramani; Archit Sharma; Jacob T Gutsche; John G Augoustides; Harish Ramakrishna
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 7.  Current Devices and Complications Related to Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: The Bumpy Road to the Top.

Authors:  Faraj Kargoli; Matteo Pagnesi; Kusha Rahgozar; Ythan Goldberg; Edwin Ho; Mei Chau; Antonio Colombo; Azeem Latib
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-11

8.  Predictors of functional mitral regurgitation recurrence after percutaneous mitral valve repair.

Authors:  Katharina Hellhammer; Jean M Haurand; Maximilian Spieker; Peter Luedike; Tienush Rassaf; Tobias Zeus; Malte Kelm; Ralf Westenfeld; Patrick Horn
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 9.  Cerebral Protection Devices during Transcatheter Interventions: Indications, Benefits, and Limitations.

Authors:  Stephan Haussig; Axel Linke; Norman Mangner
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Transcatheter Repair and Replacement Technologies for Mitral Regurgitation: a European Perspective.

Authors:  Joris F Ooms; Nicolas M Van Mieghem
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.