Literature DB >> 30124780

Microtexture and the Cell/Biomaterial Interface: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Capsular Contracture and Prosthetic Breast Implants.

Orr Shauly1, Daniel J Gould1, Ketan M Patel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of textured breast implants over smooth implants has been widely shown to have a lower incidence of capsular contracture. However, the impact of micropatterning techniques on the incidence of postoperative patient morbidity has not been comprehensively investigated.
OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to examine the incidence of capsular contracture, seroma, and implant rippling among the 3 major micropatterning techniques applied in the manufacturing of textured breast implants.
METHODS: Literature searches of PubMed/Medline and Embase between 1995 and 2017 were performed, and 19 studies were selected for analysis. Data from each study were extracted into a form including mean age, study design, population size, mean follow-up, number of capsular contracture cases, number of seroma cases, and number of rippling cases. Meta-analysis was performed separately for studies that included capsular contracture rates for foam textured implants, imprinted textured implants, and salt-loss textured implants.
RESULTS: The pooled rate of capsular contracture rates in primary augmentation patients was 3.80% (95% CI, 2.19-5.40) for imprinted textured implants, 4.90% (95% CI, 3.16-6.64) for foam textured implants, 5.27% (95% CI, 3.22-7.31) for salt-loss textured implants, and 15.56% (95% CI, 13.31-18.16) for smooth implants. The results of each meta-analysis were summarized on a forest plot depicting the distribution of capsular contracture rates from each study.
CONCLUSIONS: Micropatterning of prosthetic implants could drastically reduce postoperative patient morbidity given the advent of recent technologies that allow for more detailed texturing of implant surfaces.
© 2018 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30124780     DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjy178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  3 in total

1.  Smooth versus Textured Implant Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.

Authors:  Joshua Vorstenbosch; Colleen M McCarthy; Meghana G Shamsunder; Thais O Polanco; Stefan Dabic; Itay Wiser; Evan Matros; Joseph Dayan; Joseph J Disa; Andrea L Pusic; Michele R Cavalli; Elizabeth Encarnacion; Meghan Lee; Babak J Mehrara; Jonas A Nelson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 5.169

Review 2.  Controllable Factors to Reduce the Rate of Complications in Primary Breast Augmentation: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Paolo Montemurro; Per Hedén; Björn Behr; Christoph Wallner
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Size matters-in vitro behaviour of human fibroblasts on textured silicone surfaces with different pore sizes.

Authors:  Julia Tolksdorf; Raymund E Horch; Jasmin S Grüner; Rafael Schmid; Annika Kengelbach-Weigand; Dirk W Schubert; Siegfried Werner; Dominik Schneidereit; Oliver Friedrich; Ingo Ludolph
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.896

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.