Literature DB >> 30121742

The Social Impact of Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions: An analysis of the Canada Vigilance Spontaneous Reporting Database.

Genaro Castillon1,2, Francesco Salvo3,4, Yola Moride5,6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Some adverse drug reactions (ADRs) may involve direct social issues, such as impaired quality of life, work productivity, or social functioning, as opposed to being social consequences of medical adverse events. Data on ADRs with a direct social impact remain scarce in the literature.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe the ADRs consisting of direct social issues that have been recorded in the Canadian national spontaneous reporting system (Canada Vigilance).
METHODS: We conducted an analysis of the online Canada Vigilance spontaneous reporting database from 1 January 1965 (inception) to 31 December 2015 (last date available). We manually examined all Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms (PTs) found in the Canada Vigilance database to identify those that involved direct social issues. We then used those PTs to search for relevant individual case safety reports (ICSRs). We conducted a descriptive analysis of the following ICSR characteristics: patient and reporter characteristics, type of ADR, seriousness (as assessed by the reporter and according to the International Conference on Harmonisation criteria of seriousness), and suspected drug(s). We compared the characteristics of ADRs with and without direct social impact.
RESULTS: Among the 11,946 MedDRA PTs recorded in Canada Vigilance, we retained 40 that had a direct social impact. Using these PTs, we identified 9557 relevant ICSRs (corresponding to 6670 patients). The proportion of ADRs consisting of direct social issues increased over time, with a sharp transient peak in 2008. The majority were reported by healthcare professionals and consumers (56.7 and 37.8%, respectively). The mean age of patients was 45.4 years, and 53.3% were females. Direct social issues consisted of personality disorders and behaviour disturbances (41.6%) followed by neurological disorders (34.2%). The majority of ADRs were considered serious by reporters (76.5%), with 26.8% resulting in hospitalization. Commonly suspected health products included nervous system drugs (63.3%) and antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents (23.6%). Compared with other ADRs, those with a direct social impact were more often reported by consumers, involved patients who were on average 5 years younger, and were more frequently assessed as being serious by the reporters.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study support the consideration of direct social issues as ADRs in the detection of drug safety signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30121742     DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0713-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  10 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of social functioning in depression.

Authors:  M Bosc
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.735

Review 2.  Development of a Conceptual Framework to Measure the Social Impact of Burns.

Authors:  Molly Marino; Marina Soley-Bori; Alan M Jette; Mary D Slavin; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Linda Resnik; Amy Acton; Flor Amaya; Melinda Rossi; Rene Soria-Saucedo; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

3.  The social impact of asthma.

Authors:  A Nocon; T Booth
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Changing patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nadége Carelle; Estelle Piotto; Agnés Bellanger; Jerome Germanaud; Alain Thuillier; David Khayat
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on life activities.

Authors:  P P Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  1995-12

6.  Differences in Adverse Event Reporting Rates of Therapeutic Failure Between Two Once-daily Extended-release Methylphenidate Medications in Canada: Analysis of Spontaneous Adverse Event Reporting Databases.

Authors:  Laura Park-Wyllie; Judy van Stralen; Genaro Castillon; Stephen E Sherman; Doron Almagor
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Adverse drug reaction reports of patients and healthcare professionals-differences in reported information.

Authors:  Leàn Rolfes; Florence van Hunsel; Sarah Wilkes; Kees van Grootheest; Eugène van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Adverse drug reactions to antiretroviral therapy: Results from spontaneous reporting system in Nigeria.

Authors:  Kenneth A Agu; Azuka C Oparah
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2013-04

9.  The Impact of Experiencing Adverse Drug Reactions on the Patient's Quality of Life: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Leàn Rolfes; Florence van Hunsel; Katja Taxis; Eugène van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Adverse Drug Reactions and their Impact on Quality of Life in Patients on Antipsychotic Therapy at a Tertiary Care Center in Delhi.

Authors:  Shalini Chawla; Shankar Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2017 May-Jun
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.