Literature DB >> 12115329

Changing patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy.

Nadége Carelle1, Estelle Piotto, Agnés Bellanger, Jerome Germanaud, Alain Thuillier, David Khayat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality-of-life (QoL) issues have become increasingly important as the number of newly diagnosed patients with cancer increases and survival improves. In 1983, Coates et al. reported a survey of patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy and showed the importance of including patient feedback for the accurate assessment of QoL (Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1983;19:203-208.). The authors carried out a similar survey in 100 patients with cancer with the objectives of 1) investigating the changes in patient perceptions that have occurred and 2) evaluating the impact of new treatments on the profile of chemotherapy side effects among patients receiving anticancer drugs.
METHODS: One hundred patients attending the outpatient Medical Oncology Department of the Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital Group were surveyed between August 1998 and February 2000 by trained interviewers who were blinded to the patients' treatment. Patients identified all side effects associated with their treatment using a set of 45 cards that named physical side effects (Group A) and a set of 27 cards that named nonphysical side effects (Group B), and the patients ranked these side effects according to severity. The top 5 cards from each group were then combined, and the resulting 10 cards were rated again by severity, regardless of group. Results were analyzed for the entire cohort and for demographic, social, and clinical subgroups.
RESULTS: The participants included 65 women and 35 men; the most common malignancies were breast carcinoma (40 patients), gastrointestinal carcinoma (19 patients), lung carcinoma (7 patients), and ovarian carcinoma (9 patients). Patients rated affects my family or partner as the most severe side effect, alopecia was second, and fatigue was the third most severe. Effects on work or home responsibilities, effects on social activities, and loss of interest in sex were ranked fourth, fifth, and sixth, respectively. The results contrasted with those of Coates et al., in which affects my family or partner was ranked 10th, and fatigue was ranked 8th.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy have changed markedly. In the current study, fatigue and psychosocial QoL concerns predominated, compared with emesis, nausea, and negative reactions to the treatment visit in the original survey. The current findings are consistent with the progress that has been made in reducing certain chemotherapy-associated toxicities. Fatigue, however, although it often is related to anemia and is treatable with recombinant human erythropoietin, remains a major concern. The emotional, social, and sexual consequences of cancer treatment present continuing challenges in efforts to optimize QoL and to develop effective supportive care. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12115329     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  102 in total

Review 1.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Initial development of the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi).

Authors:  Deborah Tomlinson; L Lee Dupuis; Paul Gibson; Donna L Johnston; Carol Portwine; Christina Baggott; Sue Zupanec; Julie Watson; Brenda Spiegler; Susan Kuczynski; Gail Macartney; Lillian Sung
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Protection against chemotherapy-induced alopecia.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Ze Lu; Jessie L-S Au
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Photocontrolled miR-148b nanoparticles cause apoptosis, inflammation and regression of Ras induced epidermal squamous cell carcinomas in mice.

Authors:  Yiming Liu; Jacob T Bailey; Mohammad Abu-Laban; Shue Li; Cong Chen; Adam B Glick; Daniel J Hayes
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  The impact of anaemia and its treatment on employee disability and medical costs.

Authors:  Ernst Berndt; William Crown; Joel Kallich; Stacey Long; Xue Song; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Self-reported taste and smell changes during cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Britt-Marie Bernhardson; Carol Tishelman; Lars E Rutqvist
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  A new strategy to prevent chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced alopecia using topically applied vasoconstrictor.

Authors:  Cheryl M Soref; William E Fahl
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Scalp cooling to prevent chemotherapy-induced hair loss: practical and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Floortje Mols; Corina J van den Hurk; Ad J J M Vingerhoets; Wim P M Breed
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Unanticipated toxicities from anticancer therapies: survivors' perspectives.

Authors:  Mona Gandhi; Karen Oishi; Beth Zubal; Mario E Lacouture
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Effects of 10.6-μm laser moxibustion and electroacupuncture at ST36 in a 5-Fu-induced diarrhea rat model.

Authors:  Huaijin Cheng; Ling Zhao; Ziyong Ju; Fan Wang; Meng Qin; Huijuan Mao; Xueyong Shen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.