Literature DB >> 30121574

Should NICE reconsider the 2016 UK guidelines on TB contact tracing? A cost-effectiveness analysis of contact investigations in London.

Sean M Cavany1,2,3, Emilia Vynnycky1,2, Charlotte S Anderson4, Helen Maguire4,5, Frank Sandmann2,6, H Lucy Thomas7, Richard G White1, Tom Sumner1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In January 2016, clinical TB guidance in the UK changed to no longer recommend screening contacts of non-pulmonary, non-laryngeal (ETB) index cases. However, no new evidence was cited for this change, and there is evidence that screening these contacts may be worthwhile. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of screening contacts of adult ETB cases and adult pulmonary or laryngeal TB (PTB) cases in London, UK.
METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional analysis of data collected on TB index cases and contacts in the London TB register and an economic evaluation using a static model describing contact tracing outcomes. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated using no screening as the baseline comparator. All adult TB cases (≥15 years old) in London from 2012 to 2015, and their contacts, were eligible (2465/5084 PTB and 2559/6090 ETB index cases were included).
RESULTS: Assuming each contact with PTB infects one person/month, the ICER of screening contacts of ETB cases was £78 000/quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) (95% CI 39 000 to 140 000), and screening contacts of PTB cases was £30 000/QALY (95% CI 18 000 to 50 000). The ICER of screening contacts of ETB cases was £30 000/QALY if each contact with PTB infects 3.4 people/month. Limitations of this study include the use of self-reported symptomatic periods and lack of knowledge about onward transmission from PTB contacts.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening contacts of ETB cases in London was almost certainly not cost-effective at any conventional willingness-to-pay threshold in England, supporting recent changes to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence national guidelines. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacterial infection; health economist; respiratory infection; tuberculosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30121574     DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-211662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  1 in total

1.  Contacts of underserved tuberculosis patients have higher odds of TB disease in North West England: a cohort study.

Authors:  T Wingfield; P MacPherson; P Sodha; A Tucker; J Mithoo; S B Squire; P Cleary
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.373

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.