Literature DB >> 30120703

Ultrasound imaging of the anorectal malformation during the neonatal period: a comprehensive review.

Takahiro Hosokawa1, Yoshitake Yamada2, Mayumi Hsokawa3, Shunsuke Kikuchi4, Kenji Ohira4, Yutaka Tanami4, Yumiko Sato4, Eiji Oguma4.   

Abstract

Anorectal malformation (ARM) is classified as low, intermediate, or high; accurate diagnosis of the type during the early neonatal period is important to determine the appropriate initial surgical approach. This review assesses the role of ultrasound examination in the classification of ARM during the neonatal period, with a focus on landmarks on the sonogram, the approach used for sonography, and the optimal examination timing. The following three factors on the sonogram are used for the classification: location of the fistula, the distance between the distal rectal pouch and the anal dimple (perineum) (P-P distance), and the relationship between the puborectalis muscle and the distal rectal pouch. Three approaches can be used to evaluate ARM by ultrasonography, namely, suprapubic, perineal, and infracoccygeal approaches. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages. Optimal timing of the ultrasound examination is also important with respect to each factor to classify ARM. We have described the pitfalls of ultrasound in diagnosis of cases, namely ARM with Down syndrome (which tends to be without fistula), ARM with low birth weight, ARM with unusual location of fistula, ARM with opened fistula (where the P-P distance is unreliable), and cloacal malformation (variation of the high-type ARM).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anorectal malformation; Imperforate anus; Sonography; Ultrasonography; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30120703     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-018-0767-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  38 in total

1.  Transperineal ultrasonography in imperforate anus: identification of the internal fistula.

Authors:  I O Kim; T I Han; W S Kim; K M Yeon
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Ultrasonography of imperforate anus in neonate: an approach correlated with current surgical concepts.

Authors:  H P Haber
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 6.548

3.  Clinical value of pelvic 3-dimensional magnetic resonance image reconstruction in anorectal malformations.

Authors:  Shao-Tao Tang; Guo-Qing Cao; Yong-Zhong Mao; Yong Wang; Shi-Wang Li; Ying Yang; Qiang-Song Tong
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy for the Low-Type Imperforate Anus Between Prone Cross-Table Radiography and Sonography.

Authors:  Takahiro Hosokawa; Mayumi Hosokawa; Yutaka Tanami; Shinya Hattori; Yumiko Sato; Yujiro Tanaka; Hiroshi Kawashima; Eiji Oguma; Yoshitake Yamada
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  The radiologic evaluation of imperforate anus. An approach correlated with current surgical concepts.

Authors:  W E Berdon; D H Baker; T V Santulli; R Amoury
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Distance Between the Distal Rectal Pouch and Perineum in Neonates of Low-Birth Weight With Imperforate Anus.

Authors:  Takahiro Hosokawa; Mayumi Hosokawa; Yutaka Tanami; Hiroaki Takahashi; Shinya Hattori; Yumiko Sato; Yujiro Tanaka; Hiroshi Kawashima; Eiji Oguma; Yoshitake Yamada
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.657

7.  Subcutaneous fat in the fetal abdomen as a predictor of growth restriction.

Authors:  F Gardeil; R Greene; B Stuart; M J Turner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Anorectal Malformations: Finding the Pathway out of the Labyrinth.

Authors:  Leonor Alamo; Blaise J Meyrat; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Reto A Meuli; François Gudinchet
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Risk factors in the primary management of anorectal malformations in Northern India.

Authors:  G Chalapathi; S K Chowdhary; K L N Rao; R Samujh; K L Narasimhan; J K Mahajan; P Menon
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Transperineal sonography for determination of the type of imperforate anus.

Authors:  Hans P Haber; Guido Seitz; Steven W Warmann; Jörg Fuchs
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  3 in total

1.  The role of ultrasound to evaluate the disorders of sex development: a pictorial essay.

Authors:  Takahiro Hosokawa; Yutaka Tanami; Yumiko Sato; Mayumi Hosokawa; Eiji Oguma
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2022-01-06

2.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy for fistulae at ultrasound and voiding cystourethrogram in neonates with anorectal malformation.

Authors:  Takahiro Hosokawa; Yoshitake Yamada; Yutaka Tanami; Yumiko Sato; Tetsuya Ishimaru; Yujiro Tanaka; Hiroshi Kawashima; Eiji Oguma
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-01-21

3.  Accuracy of pre-operative fistula diagnostics in anorectal malformations.

Authors:  Louise Tofft; Martin Salö; Einar Arnbjörnsson; Pernilla Stenström
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.125

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.