Literature DB >> 29112640

Distance Between the Distal Rectal Pouch and Perineum in Neonates of Low-Birth Weight With Imperforate Anus.

Takahiro Hosokawa, Mayumi Hosokawa, Yutaka Tanami, Hiroaki Takahashi, Shinya Hattori, Yumiko Sato, Yujiro Tanaka, Hiroshi Kawashima, Eiji Oguma, Yoshitake Yamada.   

Abstract

This study was to evaluate the correlation between birth weight and the distance between distal rectal pouch and perineum (P-P distance) and to determine a cutoff value for P-P distance to diagnose low-type imperforate anus in neonates with low-birth weight (LBW).We included 15 neonates with LBW (mean weight, 2012 ± 470 g; range, 906-2452 g) and imperforate anus (surgically confirmed: 11 low type and 3/1 intermediate/high type), who underwent ultrasonography on the day after birth. Type of imperforate anus was defined based on the International Classification of Anorectal Anomalies. The P-P distances on ultrasonograms were measured. Pearson correlation coefficient test and receiver operating characteristic curve were used for statistical analyses.Among all 15 neonates, nonsignificant correlation was observed between the birth weight and P-P distance (r = 0.36; P = 0.18). Mean P-P distance was 9.0 ± 6.6 mm (range, 1.0-24.0 mm) in all neonates, 5.7 ± 2.8 mm (range, 1.0-11.0 mm) in the 11 neonates with low-type imperforate anus, and 18.3 ± 9.1 mm (range, 14.0-24.0 mm) in the 4 neonates with intermediate-/high-type imperforate anus. Using cutoff P-P distance of 12.5 mm, sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of low-type imperforate anus were 100% (11/11) and 100% (4/4), respectively.In conclusion, nonsignificant correlation was observed between P-P distance and birth weight, and cutoff P-P distance to diagnose low-type imperforate anus was 12.5 mm. Despite the very small sample size in our study, and only 4 neonates with intermediate-/high-type imperforate anus, these findings are important because surgical management whether transperineal anoplasty or diverting colostomy is decided based on the type of imperforate anus, and P-P distance to diagnose the type of imperforate anus was feasible even in neonates with LBW.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29112640     DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Q        ISSN: 0894-8771            Impact factor:   1.657


  2 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound imaging of the anorectal malformation during the neonatal period: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Takahiro Hosokawa; Yoshitake Yamada; Mayumi Hsokawa; Shunsuke Kikuchi; Kenji Ohira; Yutaka Tanami; Yumiko Sato; Eiji Oguma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy for fistulae at ultrasound and voiding cystourethrogram in neonates with anorectal malformation.

Authors:  Takahiro Hosokawa; Yoshitake Yamada; Yutaka Tanami; Yumiko Sato; Tetsuya Ishimaru; Yujiro Tanaka; Hiroshi Kawashima; Eiji Oguma
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-01-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.