Literature DB >> 30120157

Impact of Guideline-Discordant Treatment on Cost and Health Care Utilization in Older Adults with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Courtney P Williams1, Kelly M Kenzik2,3, Andres Azuero4, Grant R Williams2,3, Maria Pisu5, Karina I Halilova2, Stacey A Ingram2, Supriya K Yagnik6, Andres Forero2,7, Smita Bhatia3, Gabrielle B Rocque2,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-based treatment is a marker of high-quality care. The impact of guideline discordance on cost and health care utilization is unclear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of Medicare claims data from 2012 to 2015 included women age ≥65 with stage I-III breast cancer receiving care within the University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Community Network. Concordance with NCCN guidelines was assessed for treatment regimens. Costs to Medicare and health care utilization were identified from start of cancer treatment until death or available follow-up. Adjusted monthly cost and utilization rates were estimated using linear mixed effect and generalized linear models.
RESULTS: Of 1,177 patients, 16% received guideline-discordant treatment, which was associated with nonwhite race, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negative, human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) positive, and later-stage cancer. Discordant therapy was primarily related to reduced-intensity treatments (single-agent chemotherapy, HER2-targeted therapy without chemotherapy, bevacizumab without chemotherapy, platinum combinations without anthracyclines). In adjusted models, average monthly costs for guideline-discordant patients were $936 higher compared with concordant (95% confidence limits $611, $1,260). For guideline-discordant patients, adjusted rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations per thousand observations were 25% higher (49.9 vs. 39.9) and 19% higher (24.0 vs. 20.1) per month than concordant patients, respectively.
CONCLUSION: One in six patients with early-stage breast cancer received guideline-discordant care, predominantly related to undertreatment, which was associated with higher costs and rates of health care utilization. Additional randomized trials are needed to test lower-toxicity regimens and guide clinicians in treatment for older breast cancer patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Previous studies lack details about types of deviations from chemotherapy guidelines that occur in older early-stage breast cancer patients. Understanding the patterns of guideline discordance and its impact on patient outcomes will be particularly important for these patients. This study found 16% received guideline-discordant care, predominantly related to reduced intensity treatment and associated with higher costs and rates of health care utilization. Increasing older adult participation in clinical trials should be a priority in order to fill the knowledge gap about how to treat older, less fit patients with breast cancer. © AlphaMed Press 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Guidelines; Health care utilization; Medicare costs; Treatment

Year:  2018        PMID: 30120157      PMCID: PMC6324646          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  41 in total

1.  Cost and Survival Analysis Before and After Implementation of Dana-Farber Clinical Pathways for Patients With Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  David M Jackman; Yichen Zhang; Carole Dalby; Tom Nguyen; Julia Nagle; Christine A Lydon; Michael S Rabin; Kristen K McNiff; Belen Fraile; Joseph O Jacobson
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 3.  Adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer: who and what?

Authors:  Hyman B Muss
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance.

Authors:  Cynthia M Boyd; Jonathan Darer; Chad Boult; Linda P Fried; Lisa Boult; Albert W Wu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives.

Authors:  P S Romano; L L Roos; J G Jollis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM.

Authors:  Stephen B Edge; Carolyn C Compton
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016.

Authors:  Kimberly D Miller; Rebecca L Siegel; Chun Chieh Lin; Angela B Mariotto; Joan L Kramer; Julia H Rowland; Kevin D Stein; Rick Alteri; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Documenting the benefits and cost savings of a large multistate cancer pathway program from a payer's perspective.

Authors:  Eugene D Kreys; Jim M Koeller
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Barriers to clinical trial participation by older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  M Margaret Kemeny; Bercedis L Peterson; Alice B Kornblith; Hyman B Muss; Judith Wheeler; Ellis Levine; Nancy Bartlett; Gini Fleming; Harvey J Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Adherence to treatment guidelines and survival in triple-negative breast cancer: a retrospective multi-center cohort study with 9,156 patients.

Authors:  Lukas Schwentner; Achim Wöckel; Jochem König; Wolfgang Janni; Florian Ebner; Maria Blettner; Rolf Kreienberg; Reyn Van Ewijk
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  9 in total

1.  Clinical Molecular Marker Testing Data Capture to Promote Precision Medicine Research Within the Cancer Research Network.

Authors:  Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Natalia Udaltsova; Lawrence H Kushi; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Pamala A Pawloski; Douglas A Corley; Sarah Knerr; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; David C Tabano; Mara M Epstein; Stacey A Honda; Monica Ter-Minassian; Julie A Lynch; Christine Y Lu
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-09

2.  Bridging the Data-Free Zone: Decision Making for Older Adults With Cancer.

Authors:  Gabrielle B Rocque; Grant R Williams
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Is the lack of evidence in older adults with cancer compromising safety?

Authors:  Darryl Outlaw; Grant R Williams
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.250

4.  Nonadherence to Multimodality Cancer Treatment Guidelines in the United States.

Authors:  Leila T Tchelebi; Biyi Shen; Ming Wang; Louis Potters; Joseph Herman; Daniel Boffa; Joel E Segel; Henry S Park; Nicholas G Zaorsky
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-08

5.  Methodological approaches to measuring the incidence of unplanned emergency department presentations by cancer patients receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  P H Dufton; M F Gerdtz; R Jarden; M Krishnasamy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Association of guideline-concordant initial systemic treatment with clinical and economic outcomes among older women with metastatic breast cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Tyler Mantaian; Shweta Kamat; Sobha Kurian; Stephen Kogut
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  Suboptimal therapy following breast conserving surgery in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Johnson; Paula D Strassle; Guilherme C de Oliveira; Chris B Agala; Philip Spanheimer; Kristalyn Gallagher; David Ollila; Hyman Muss; Stephanie Downs-Canner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.624

8.  Information Access and Use by Patients With Cancer and Their Friends and Family: Development of a Grounded Theory.

Authors:  Maclean Thiessen; Shane Sinclair; Patricia A Tang; Shelley Raffin Bouchal
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Demetria Smith-Graziani; Xiudong Lei; Sharon H Giordano; Hui Zhao; Meghan Karuturi; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 4.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.