Literature DB >> 30117514

A 96-well microplate bioreactor platform supporting individual dual perfusion and high-throughput assessment of simple or biofabricated 3D tissue models.

J Parrish1, K S Lim, K Baer, G J Hooper, T B F Woodfield.   

Abstract

Traditional 2D monolayer cell cultures and submillimeter 3D tissue construct cultures used widely in tissue engineering are limited in their ability to extrapolate experimental data to predict in vivo responses due to their simplistic organization and lack of stimuli. The rise of biofabrication and bioreactor technologies has sought to address this through the development of techniques to spatially organize components of a tissue construct, and devices to supply these tissue constructs with an increasingly in vivo-like environment. Current bioreactors supporting both parenchymal and barrier tissue constructs in interconnected systems for body-on-a-chip platforms have chosen to emphasize study throughput or system/tissue complexity. Here, we report a platform to address this disparity in throughput and both system complexity (by supporting multiple in situ assessment methods) and tissue complexity (by adopting a construct-agnostic format). We introduce an ANSI/SLAS-compliant microplate and docking station fabricated via stereolithography (SLA), or precision machining, to provide up to 96 samples (Ø6 × 10 mm) with two individually-addressable fluid circuits (192 total), loading access, and inspection window for imaging during perfusion. Biofabricated ovarian cancer models were developed to demonstrate the in situ assessment capabilities via microscopy and a perfused resazurin-based metabolic activity assay. In situ microscopy highlighted flexibility of the sample housing to accommodate a range of sample geometries. Utility for drug screening was demonstrated by exposing the ovarian cancer models to an anticancer drug (doxorubicin) and generating the dose-response curve in situ, while achieving an assay quality similar to static wellplate culture. The potential for quantitative analysis of temporal tissue development and screening studies was confirmed by imaging soft- (gelatin) and hard-tissue (calcium chloride) analogs inside the bioreactor via spectral computed tomography (CT) scanning. As a proof-of-concept for particle tracing studies, flowing microparticles were visualized to inform the design of hydrogel constructs. Finally, the ability for mechanistic yet high-throughput screening was demonstrated in a vascular coculture model adopting endothelial and mesenchymal stem cells (HUVEC-MSC), encapsulated in gelatin-norbornene (gel-NOR) hydrogel cast into SLA-printed well inserts. This study illustrates the potential of a scalable dual perfusion bioreactor platform for parenchymal and barrier tissue constructs to support a broad range of multi-organ-on-a-chip applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30117514     DOI: 10.1039/c8lc00485d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  11 in total

Review 1.  3D bioprinting for reconstituting the cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Pallab Datta; Madhuri Dey; Zaman Ataie; Derya Unutmaz; Ibrahim T Ozbolat
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-07-27

Review 2.  New Frontiers for Biofabrication and Bioreactor Design in Microphysiological System Development.

Authors:  Jonathon Parrish; Khoon Lim; Boyang Zhang; Milica Radisic; Tim B F Woodfield
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 3.  Perspectives for 3D-Bioprinting in Modeling of Tumor Immune Evasion.

Authors:  Rafał Staros; Agata Michalak; Kinga Rusinek; Krzysztof Mucha; Zygmunt Pojda; Radosław Zagożdżon
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  MatriGrid® Based Biological Morphologies: Tools for 3D Cell Culturing.

Authors:  Patrick Mai; Jörg Hampl; Martin Baca; Dana Brauer; Sukhdeep Singh; Frank Weise; Justyna Borowiec; André Schmidt; Johanna Merle Küstner; Maren Klett; Michael Gebinoga; Insa S Schroeder; Udo R Markert; Felix Glahn; Berit Schumann; Diana Eckstein; Andreas Schober
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20

5.  Microfluidics-enabled 96-well perfusion system for high-throughput tissue engineering and long-term all-optical electrophysiology.

Authors:  Lai Wei; Weizhen Li; Emilia Entcheva; Zhenyu Li
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Discovering the Latest Scientific Pathways on Tissue Spheroids: Opportunities to Innovate.

Authors:  Marisela Rodriguez-Salvador; Baruc Emet Perez-Benitez; Karen Marcela Padilla-Aguirre
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2021-01-29

Review 7.  3D Tissue-Engineered Vascular Drug Screening Platforms: Promise and Considerations.

Authors:  Isra Marei; Tala Abu Samaan; Maryam Ali Al-Quradaghi; Asmaa A Farah; Shamin Hayat Mahmud; Hong Ding; Chris R Triggle
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-04

Review 8.  Advances in Hybrid Fabrication toward Hierarchical Tissue Constructs.

Authors:  Paul D Dalton; Tim B F Woodfield; Vladimir Mironov; Jürgen Groll
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 9.  3D bioprinting for reconstituting the cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Pallab Datta; Madhuri Dey; Zaman Ataie; Derya Unutmaz; Ibrahim T Ozbolat
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-07-27

10.  Sorption of Neuropsychopharmaca in Microfluidic Materials for In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Thomas E Winkler; Anna Herland
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 9.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.