Literature DB >> 33664473

3D bioprinting for reconstituting the cancer microenvironment.

Pallab Datta1, Madhuri Dey2, Zaman Ataie3, Derya Unutmaz4, Ibrahim T Ozbolat5,6,7,8.   

Abstract

The cancer microenvironment is known for its complexity, both in its content as well as its dynamic nature, which is difficult to study using two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models. Several advances in tissue engineering have allowed more physiologically relevant three-dimensional (3D) in vitro cancer models, such as spheroid cultures, biopolymer scaffolds, and cancer-on-a-chip devices. Although these models serve as powerful tools for dissecting the roles of various biochemical and biophysical cues in carcinoma initiation and progression, they lack the ability to control the organization of multiple cell types in a complex dynamic 3D architecture. By virtue of its ability to precisely define perfusable networks and position of various cell types in a high-throughput manner, 3D bioprinting has the potential to more closely recapitulate the cancer microenvironment, relative to current methods. In this review, we discuss the applications of 3D bioprinting in mimicking cancer microenvironment, their use in immunotherapy as prescreening tools, and overview of current bioprinted cancer models.

Year:  2020        PMID: 33664473     DOI: 10.1038/s41698-020-0121-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol        ISSN: 2397-768X


  73 in total

Review 1.  Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting.

Authors:  Ibrahim T Ozbolat; Monika Hospodiuk
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  A comprehensive review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and future.

Authors:  Hemanth Gudapati; Madhuri Dey; Ibrahim Ozbolat
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Trends in clinical success rates.

Authors:  Katarzyna Smietana; Marcin Siatkowski; Martin Møller
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Material design and photo-regulated hydrolytic degradation behavior of tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated via 3D fiber deposition.

Authors:  Ruixue Yin; Nan Zhang; Kemin Wang; Hongyu Long; Tianlong Xing; Jun Nie; Hongbo Zhang; Wenjun Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 5.  Applications of tumor chip technology.

Authors:  Stephanie J Hachey; Christopher C W Hughes
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Tuning tissue growth with scaffold degradation in enzyme-sensitive hydrogels: a mathematical model.

Authors:  Umut Akalp; Stephanie J Bryant; Franck J Vernerey
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.679

7.  A porous tissue engineering scaffold selectively degraded by cell-generated reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  John R Martin; Mukesh K Gupta; Jonathan M Page; Fang Yu; Jeffrey M Davidson; Scott A Guelcher; Craig L Duvall
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Tumor necrosis is an important hallmark of aggressive endometrial cancer and associates with hypoxia, angiogenesis and inflammation responses.

Authors:  Geir Bredholt; Monica Mannelqvist; Ingunn M Stefansson; Even Birkeland; Trond Hellem Bø; Anne M Øyan; Jone Trovik; Karl-Henning Kalland; Inge Jonassen; Helga B Salvesen; Elisabeth Wik; Lars A Akslen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-24

Review 9.  Targeting Mitochondrial Function to Treat Quiescent Tumor Cells in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Xiaonan Zhang; Angelo de Milito; Maria Hägg Olofsson; Joachim Gullbo; Padraig D'Arcy; Stig Linder
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Bioprinting three-dimensional cell-laden tissue constructs with controllable degradation.

Authors:  Zhengjie Wu; Xin Su; Yuanyuan Xu; Bin Kong; Wei Sun; Shengli Mi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.