Literature DB >> 30117275

Retrospective evaluation of a decision-support algorithm (MIPOGG) for genetic referrals for children with neuroblastic tumors.

Catherine Goudie1, Noelle Cullinan1, Anita Villani1, Natalie Mathews2, Kalene van Engelen3, David Malkin1, Meredith S Irwin1, William D Foulkes4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuroblastoma is the most common pediatric extracranial solid tumor. Germline pathogenic variants in ALK and PHOX2B, as well as other cancer predisposition genes, are increasingly implicated in the pathogenesis of neuroblastic tumors. A challenge for clinicians is the identification of children with neuroblastoma who require genetics evaluation for underlying cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS). PROCEDURE: We developed a decisional algorithm (MIPOGG) to identify which patients with neuroblastic tumors have an increased likelihood of an underlying CPS. This algorithm, comprising 11 Yes/No questions, evaluates features in the tumor, personal and family history that are suggestive of an underlying CPS. We assessed the algorithm's performance in a retrospective cohort.
RESULTS: Two hundred and nine of 278 consecutive patients with neuroblastic tumors at The Hospital for Sick Children (2007-2016) had sufficient clinical data for retrospective application of the decisional algorithm. Fifty-one of 209 patients had been referred to genetics for CPS evaluation; 6/51 had a genetic or clinical confirmation of a CPS. The algorithm correctly identified all six children (Beckwith-Wiedemann (n = 2), Fanconi anemia, RB1, PHOX2B, chromosome duplication involving ALK) as requiring a genetic evaluation by using clinical features present at diagnosis. The level of agreement between the algorithm and physicians was 83.9%, with 15 more patients identified by the algorithm than by physicians as requiring a genetics referral.
CONCLUSIONS: This decisional algorithm appropriately detected all patients who, following genetic evaluation, were confirmed to have a CPS and may improve the detection of CPS in patients with neuroblastic tumors compared with current practice.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MIPOGG study; cancer predisposition syndrome; decision-support tool; genetic; neuroblastoma; pediatric

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30117275     DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer        ISSN: 1545-5009            Impact factor:   3.167


  8 in total

1.  DICER1 syndrome in a young adult with pituitary blastoma.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Chong; HyeRim Han; Steffen Albrecht; Young Cheol Weon; Sang Kyu Park; William D Foulkes
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 17.088

2.  Performance of the McGill Interactive Pediatric OncoGenetic Guidelines for Identifying Cancer Predisposition Syndromes.

Authors:  Catherine Goudie; Leora Witkowski; Noelle Cullinan; Lara Reichman; Ian Schiller; Melissa Tachdjian; Linlea Armstrong; Katherine A Blood; Josée Brossard; Ledia Brunga; Chantel Cacciotti; Kimberly Caswell; Sonia Cellot; Mary Egan Clark; Catherine Clinton; Hallie Coltin; Kathleen Felton; Conrad V Fernandez; Adam J Fleming; Noemi Fuentes-Bolanos; Paul Gibson; Ronald Grant; Rawan Hammad; Lynn W Harrison; Meredith S Irwin; Donna L Johnston; Sarah Kane; Lucie Lafay-Cousin; Irene Lara-Corrales; Valerie Larouche; Natalie Mathews; M Stephen Meyn; Orli Michaeli; Renée Perrier; Meghan Pike; Angela Punnett; Vijay Ramaswamy; Jemma Say; Gino Somers; Uri Tabori; My Linh Thibodeau; Annie-Kim Toupin; Katherine M Tucker; Kalene van Engelen; Stephanie Vairy; Nicolas Waespe; Meera Warby; Jonathan D Wasserman; James A Whitlock; Daniel Sinnett; Nada Jabado; Paul C Nathan; Adam Shlien; Junne Kamihara; Rebecca J Deyell; David S Ziegler; Kim E Nichols; Nandini Dendukuri; David Malkin; Anita Villani; William D Foulkes
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 33.006

Review 3.  Diagnostic Strategies and Algorithms for Investigating Cancer Predisposition Syndromes in Children Presenting with Malignancy.

Authors:  Linda Rossini; Caterina Durante; Silvia Bresolin; Enrico Opocher; Antonio Marzollo; Alessandra Biffi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Landscape of germline cancer predisposition mutations testing and management in pediatrics: Implications for research and clinical care.

Authors:  Shilpa A Shahani; Erin L Marcotte
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.569

5.  Proportion of children with cancer that have an indication for genetic counseling and testing based on the cancer type irrespective of other features.

Authors:  Thi Minh Kha Nguyen; Astrid Behnert; Torsten Pietsch; Christian Vokuhl; Christian Peter Kratz
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Effective identification of cancer predisposition syndromes in children with cancer employing a questionnaire.

Authors:  Miriam Schwermer; Astrid Behnert; Beate Dörgeloh; Tim Ripperger; Christian P Kratz
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Choose and stay on one out of two paths: distinction between clinical versus research genetic testing to identify cancer predisposition syndromes among patients with cancer.

Authors:  Tim Ripperger; D Gareth Evans; David Malkin; Christian P Kratz
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Selection criteria for assembling a pediatric cancer predisposition syndrome gene panel.

Authors:  Anna Byrjalsen; Illja J Diets; Jette Bakhuizen; Thomas van Overeem Hansen; Kjeld Schmiegelow; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Ulrik Stoltze; Roland P Kuiper; Johannes H M Merks; Karin Wadt; Marjolijn Jongmans
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.375

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.