Literature DB >> 30116578

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of (E)-3-(2-chloro-4-fluoro-phen-yl)-1-(2,5-di-chloro-thio-phen-3-yl)prop-2-en-1-one.

T N Sanjeeva Murthy1, S Naveen2, C S Chidan Kumar3, M K Veeraiah4, Ching Kheng Quah5, B P Siddaraju6, Ismail Warad7.   

Abstract

In the title chalcone-thio-phene derivative, C13H6Cl3FOS, the aromatic rings are inclined to one another by 12.9 (2)°, and the thio-phene ring is affected by π-conjugation. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by C-H⋯F hydrogen bonds, forming an R22(8) ring motif. A Hirshfeld surface analysis was conducted to verify the contribution of the different inter-molecular inter-actions. The shape-index surface clearly shows that the two sides of the mol-ecules are involved in the same contacts with neighbouring mol-ecules and the curvedness plots show flat surface patches characteristic of planar stacking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surface analysis; R_{2}^{2}(8) ring motif; Thio­phene chalcone; crystal structure; hydrogen bonding

Year:  2018        PMID: 30116578      PMCID: PMC6073002          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018010216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Natural products are important sources in the search for new agents for cancer therapies with minimal side effects. Chalcones, considered to be the precursor of flavonoids and isoflavonoids, are abundant in edible plants. Compounds with the 1,3-di­phenyl­prop-2-en-1-one framework are described by its generic term ‘chalcone’. They consist of open-chain flavonoids in which the two aromatic rings are joined by a three-carbon α,β-unsaturated carbonyl system. These are coloured compounds because of the presence of the –CO—CH=CH– chromophore, which depends in the presence of other auxochromes. Accumulating evidence has shown that chalcones and their derivatives could inhibit tumor initiation and progression. In view of the above, and as a part of our ongoing research on chalcone derivatives (Naveen et al., 2017 ▸; Lokeshwari et al., 2017 ▸; Tejkiran et al., 2016 ▸), we report herein the synthesis, crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of the title compound.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, shown in Fig. 1 ▸, is comprised of two aromatic rings (chloro­fluoro­phenyl and di­chloro­thio­phene) linked by C=CC(=O)—C enone bridge. The bond lengths and bond angles are normal and the mol­ecular conformation is characterized by a dihedral angle of 12.9 (2)° between the mean planes of the two aromatic rings. The olefinic double bond C6=C7 of 1.303 (6) Å is in an E configuration and is Csp 2 hybridized. The unsaturated keto group is in a syn-periplanar conformation with respect to the olefenic double bond, which is evident from the torsion angle value of −0.5 (8)° for the atoms O1—C5—C6—C7. The thio­phene ring is affected by π conjugation. This can be explained by the longer C=S values of 1.703 (6) and 1.714 (4) Å for S1=C2 and S1=C1, respectively. The bond-angle values O1—C5—C6 [121.9 (4)°], O1—C5—C4 [118.2 (4)°] and C5—C6—C7 = 125.14 (4)° about C5 indicate that the carbon atom is in a distorted trigonal–planar configuration, which is due to steric hindrance of the oxygen atom. The mol­ecular structure is stabilized by an intra­molecular C6—-H6A⋯Cl1 hydrogen bond (Table 1 ▸) that closes an S(6) motif, as shown in Fig. 1 ▸.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, indicating the atom-numbering scheme. The intra­molecular C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bond (dashed line) closes an S(6) motif. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C6—H6A⋯Cl10.932.473.207 (5)136
C10—H10A⋯F1i 0.932.543.433 (6)160

Symmetry code: (i) .

supra­molecular features

In the crystal, the mol­ecules are linked by C—H⋯F hydrogen bonds, forming an (8) ring motif as shown in Fig. 2 ▸. The structure also features π–π inter­actions: Cg1Cg1(x − 1, y, z) = 3.956 (3) Å [α = 0°, β = 24.0°, γ = 24.0°, perpendicular distance of Cg1 on itself = 3.6131 (19) Å] and Cg2Cg2(x + 1, y, z) = 3.957 (3) Å [α = 0°, β = 27.3°, γ = 27.3°] where Cg1 and Cg2 are the centroids of the S1/C1–C4 and C8–C13 rings, respectively.
Figure 2

The (8) ring motif.

Database survey

A survey of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.39, last update November 2016; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) using (E)-3-(phen­yl)-1-(2,5-di­chloro­thio­phen-3-yl)prop-2-en-1-one as the main skeleton revealed the presence of three structures containing a similar 2,5-di­chloro­thio­phene–chalcone moiety to the title compound but with different substituents on the terminal phenyl rings, viz. [(E)-1-(2,5-di­chloro-3-thien­yl)-3-(X)prop-2-en-1-one], where X = 4-(di­methyl­amino)­phenyl (Dutkiewicz et al., 2010 ▸), 3,4-di­meth­oxy­phenyl (Harrison et al., 2010a ▸) and 6-meth­oxy-2-naphthyl (Jasinski et al., 2010 ▸). In these three compounds, the dihedral angles between the central and terminal phen­yl/naphthyl ring are in the range 2.13–11.90°. The difference may arise from the inter­molecular hydrogen bonds between adjacent mol­ecules.

Hirshfeld surface analysis

Hirshfeld surfaces and fingerprint plots were generated for the title compound based on the crystallographic information file (CIF) using CrystalExplorer (McKinnon et al., 2007 ▸). Hirshfeld surfaces enable the visualization of inter­molecular inter­actions with different colours and colour intensity representing short or long contacts and indicating the relative strength of the inter­actions. Figs. 3 ▸ and 4 ▸ show the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over d norm (−0.139 to 1.120 a.u.) and shape-index (−1.0 to 1.0 a.u.), respectively. The calculated volume inside the Hirshfeld surface is 325.37 Å3 in the area of 310.17 Å3.
Figure 3

View of the three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface of the title compound mapped over d norm.

Figure 4

Hirshfeld surface of the title compound mapped over (a) shape-index and (b) curvedness.

In Fig. 4 ▸, the dark spots near atoms Cl1 and F1 result from the C6—H6A⋯Cl1 and C10—H10A⋯F1 inter­actions, which play a significant role in the mol­ecular packing of the title compound. The Hirshfeld surfaces illustrated in Fig. 4 ▸ also reflect the involvement of different atoms in the inter­molecular inter­actions through the appearance of blue and red regions around the participating atoms, which correspond to positive and negative electrostatic potential, respectively. The shape-index surface clearly shows that the two sides of the mol­ecules are involved in the same contacts with neighbouring mol­ecules while the curvedness plots show flat surface patches characteristic of planar stacking. The overall two-dimensional fingerprint plot for the title compound and those delineated into Cl⋯H/H⋯Cl, CC, Cl⋯Cl, Cl⋯S/S⋯Cl, H⋯H, F⋯H/H⋯F, C⋯H/H⋯C contacts are illustrated in Fig. 5 ▸; the percentage contributions from the different inter­atomic contacts to the Hirshfeld surfaces are as follows: Cl⋯H (13.8%), CC (12.7%), Cl⋯Cl (12.4%), Cl⋯S (10.7%), F⋯H (10.2%), H⋯H (10.1%), C⋯H (8.3%). The percentage contributions for other inter­molecular contacts are less than 5% in the Hirshfeld surface mapping.
Figure 5

Two-dimensional fingerprint plots showing the percentage contributions of the various inter­actions.

Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was synthesized as per the procedure reported earlier (Kumar et al., 2013a ▸,b ▸; Chidan Kumar et al., 2014 ▸). 1-(2,5-Di­chloro­thio­phen-3-yl)ethanone (0.01 mol) (Harrison et al., 2010b ▸) and 2,4-di­chloro­benzaldehyde (0.01 mol) were dissolved in 20 ml of methanol. A catalytic amount of NaOH was added to the solution dropwise with vigorous stirring. The reaction mixture was stirred for about 2 h at room temperature. The formed crude products were filtered off, washed successively with distilled water and recrystallized from methanol to give the title chalcone. The reaction scheme is shown in Fig. 6 ▸. The melting point (306–309 K) was determined using a Stuart Scientific (UK) apparatus.
Figure 6

Synthesis of the title compound.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.95–0.99 Å) and refined using a riding model with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC13H6Cl3FOS
M r 335.60
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)294
a, b, c (Å)3.9564 (8), 13.367 (2), 25.173 (5)
β (°)93.363 (4)
V3)1329.0 (4)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.84
Crystal size (mm)0.44 × 0.19 × 0.14
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII DUO CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2012)
T min, T max 0.708, 0.894
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections3901, 3901, 2430
R int 0.000
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.707
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.076, 0.218, 1.04
No. of reflections3901
No. of parameters173
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.46, −0.48

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2012 ▸), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2013 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▸) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018010216/xu5930sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018010216/xu5930Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1036795 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C13H6Cl3FOSF(000) = 672
Mr = 335.60Dx = 1.677 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2430 reflections
a = 3.9564 (8) Åθ = 1.6–30.2°
b = 13.367 (2) ŵ = 0.84 mm1
c = 25.173 (5) ÅT = 294 K
β = 93.363 (4)°Rectangle, green
V = 1329.0 (4) Å30.44 × 0.19 × 0.14 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII DUO CCD area-detector diffractometer3901 independent reflections
Radiation source: Rotating Anode2430 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.0000
Detector resolution: 18.4 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.2°, θmin = 1.6°
φ and ω scansh = −5→5
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2012)k = −18→18
Tmin = 0.708, Tmax = 0.894l = −2→35
3901 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.076Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.218H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0673P)2 + 2.8657P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3901 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
173 parametersΔρmax = 0.46 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.48 e Å3
Geometry. Bond distances, angles etc. have been calculated using the rounded fractional coordinates. All su's are estimated from the variances of the (full) variance-covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account in the estimation of distances, angles and torsion angles
Refinement. Refinement on F2 for ALL reflections except those flagged by the user for potential systematic errors. Weighted R-factors wR and all goodnesses of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The observed criterion of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating -R-factor-obs etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.3576 (4)0.89705 (9)0.29850 (5)0.0644 (5)
Cl20.2067 (5)1.14124 (14)0.48102 (5)0.0892 (6)
Cl31.1255 (5)1.22982 (11)0.10663 (6)0.0863 (6)
S10.2273 (3)0.97600 (10)0.40296 (5)0.0581 (4)
F11.3011 (10)0.8888 (3)0.03284 (14)0.0890 (16)
O10.6247 (13)1.2332 (3)0.28547 (15)0.0826 (16)
C10.3669 (11)0.9974 (3)0.34077 (16)0.0452 (11)
C20.2951 (13)1.0983 (4)0.41922 (17)0.0576 (15)
C30.4177 (12)1.1522 (4)0.37994 (16)0.0518 (16)
C40.4643 (11)1.0936 (3)0.33320 (15)0.0438 (11)
C50.6036 (13)1.1423 (3)0.28592 (16)0.0503 (14)
C60.7148 (13)1.0813 (3)0.24247 (17)0.0528 (14)
C70.8427 (14)1.1157 (4)0.19955 (16)0.0553 (14)
C80.9626 (11)1.0570 (3)0.15588 (15)0.0446 (11)
C91.0932 (12)1.1014 (4)0.11131 (17)0.0505 (16)
C101.2095 (12)1.0457 (4)0.06983 (17)0.0567 (16)
C111.1865 (13)0.9448 (4)0.0731 (2)0.0621 (19)
C121.0579 (14)0.8963 (4)0.1151 (2)0.0633 (17)
C130.9467 (13)0.9528 (4)0.15625 (18)0.0535 (16)
H3A0.467301.220000.382600.0620*
H6A0.693101.012300.245500.0630*
H7A0.858901.184800.196600.0660*
H10A1.300201.076400.040700.0680*
H12A1.045500.826800.115800.0760*
H13A0.858600.920700.185100.0640*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0855 (10)0.0491 (6)0.0602 (7)−0.0030 (6)0.0169 (6)−0.0015 (5)
Cl20.1049 (13)0.1212 (13)0.0442 (6)−0.0094 (11)0.0269 (7)−0.0147 (7)
Cl30.1298 (15)0.0642 (8)0.0694 (8)−0.0049 (9)0.0430 (9)0.0128 (6)
S10.0607 (8)0.0698 (8)0.0448 (6)−0.0031 (6)0.0114 (5)0.0138 (5)
F10.098 (3)0.096 (3)0.076 (2)0.013 (2)0.030 (2)−0.0231 (18)
O10.141 (4)0.0503 (19)0.060 (2)−0.011 (2)0.037 (2)−0.0004 (16)
C10.043 (2)0.054 (2)0.0392 (18)0.0025 (19)0.0072 (16)0.0064 (16)
C20.059 (3)0.078 (3)0.0365 (19)−0.005 (3)0.0095 (19)−0.004 (2)
C30.056 (3)0.060 (3)0.040 (2)−0.003 (2)0.0078 (19)−0.0031 (18)
C40.045 (2)0.051 (2)0.0357 (18)−0.0023 (19)0.0060 (16)0.0001 (16)
C50.066 (3)0.048 (2)0.0378 (19)−0.004 (2)0.0118 (19)0.0039 (17)
C60.067 (3)0.051 (2)0.042 (2)0.000 (2)0.017 (2)0.0039 (18)
C70.076 (3)0.052 (2)0.039 (2)0.000 (2)0.013 (2)0.0023 (17)
C80.041 (2)0.056 (2)0.0367 (18)0.0005 (19)0.0016 (16)0.0010 (16)
C90.050 (3)0.061 (3)0.041 (2)0.000 (2)0.0061 (18)0.0071 (18)
C100.050 (3)0.081 (3)0.040 (2)0.002 (3)0.0093 (19)0.001 (2)
C110.052 (3)0.081 (4)0.054 (3)0.009 (3)0.010 (2)−0.015 (2)
C120.061 (3)0.059 (3)0.071 (3)0.010 (3)0.013 (3)−0.006 (2)
C130.057 (3)0.057 (3)0.047 (2)0.006 (2)0.008 (2)0.0071 (19)
Cl1—C11.711 (4)C7—C81.453 (6)
Cl2—C21.713 (5)C8—C91.395 (6)
Cl3—C91.726 (6)C8—C131.394 (7)
S1—C11.714 (4)C9—C101.383 (7)
S1—C21.703 (5)C10—C111.355 (8)
F1—C111.359 (6)C11—C121.364 (7)
O1—C51.218 (6)C12—C131.375 (7)
C1—C41.359 (6)C3—H3A0.9300
C2—C31.337 (7)C6—H6A0.9300
C3—C41.434 (6)C7—H7A0.9300
C4—C51.490 (6)C10—H10A0.9300
C5—C61.453 (6)C12—H12A0.9300
C6—C71.303 (6)C13—H13A0.9300
C1—S1—C290.3 (2)Cl3—C9—C10117.0 (4)
Cl1—C1—S1116.2 (2)C8—C9—C10122.2 (5)
Cl1—C1—C4130.6 (3)C9—C10—C11117.6 (4)
S1—C1—C4113.3 (3)F1—C11—C10118.5 (4)
Cl2—C2—S1120.2 (3)F1—C11—C12118.2 (5)
Cl2—C2—C3126.4 (4)C10—C11—C12123.4 (5)
S1—C2—C3113.5 (4)C11—C12—C13118.3 (5)
C2—C3—C4112.5 (5)C8—C13—C12121.8 (4)
C1—C4—C3110.5 (4)C2—C3—H3A124.00
C1—C4—C5130.3 (4)C4—C3—H3A124.00
C3—C4—C5119.2 (4)C5—C6—H6A117.00
O1—C5—C4118.2 (4)C7—C6—H6A117.00
O1—C5—C6121.9 (4)C6—C7—H7A117.00
C4—C5—C6119.9 (4)C8—C7—H7A117.00
C5—C6—C7125.1 (4)C9—C10—H10A121.00
C6—C7—C8126.6 (5)C11—C10—H10A121.00
C7—C8—C9122.1 (4)C11—C12—H12A121.00
C7—C8—C13121.2 (4)C13—C12—H12A121.00
C9—C8—C13116.7 (4)C8—C13—H13A119.00
Cl3—C9—C8120.7 (4)C12—C13—H13A119.00
C2—S1—C1—Cl1−178.6 (3)C4—C5—C6—C7−179.4 (5)
C2—S1—C1—C40.7 (4)C5—C6—C7—C8178.7 (5)
C1—S1—C2—Cl2179.7 (3)C6—C7—C8—C9179.5 (5)
C1—S1—C2—C3−0.3 (4)C6—C7—C8—C130.6 (8)
Cl1—C1—C4—C3178.2 (4)C7—C8—C9—Cl31.2 (6)
Cl1—C1—C4—C5−1.8 (8)C7—C8—C9—C10179.6 (5)
S1—C1—C4—C3−0.9 (5)C13—C8—C9—Cl3−179.9 (4)
S1—C1—C4—C5179.0 (4)C13—C8—C9—C10−1.5 (7)
Cl2—C2—C3—C4179.8 (4)C7—C8—C13—C12179.7 (5)
S1—C2—C3—C4−0.2 (6)C9—C8—C13—C120.8 (7)
C2—C3—C4—C10.7 (6)Cl3—C9—C10—C11179.8 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5−179.2 (4)C8—C9—C10—C111.4 (7)
C1—C4—C5—O1169.0 (5)C9—C10—C11—F1−179.7 (4)
C1—C4—C5—C6−12.0 (8)C9—C10—C11—C12−0.5 (8)
C3—C4—C5—O1−11.1 (7)F1—C11—C12—C13179.0 (5)
C3—C4—C5—C6167.9 (4)C10—C11—C12—C13−0.2 (8)
O1—C5—C6—C7−0.5 (8)C11—C12—C13—C80.0 (8)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C6—H6A···Cl10.932.473.207 (5)136
C10—H10A···F1i0.932.543.433 (6)160
  13 in total

1.  Towards quantitative analysis of intermolecular interactions with Hirshfeld surfaces.

Authors:  Joshua J McKinnon; Dylan Jayatilaka; Mark A Spackman
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Synthesis, molecular structure, FT-IR, Raman, XRD and theoretical investigations of (2E)-1-(5-chlorothiophen-2-yl)-3-(naphthalen-2-yl)prop-2-en-1-one.

Authors:  Chandraju Sadolalu Chidan Kumar; Hoong Kun Fun; Cemal Parlak; Lydia Rhyman; Ponnadurai Ramasami; Mahir Tursun; Siddegowda Chandraju; Ching Kheng Quah
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  Synthesis of novel 2-pyrazoline analogues with potent anti-inflammatory effect mediated by inhibition of phospholipase A2: Crystallographic, in silico docking and QSAR analysis.

Authors:  Devirammanahalli Mahadevaswamy Lokeshwari; Dileep Kumar Achutha; Bharath Srinivasan; Naveen Shivalingegowda; Lokanath Neratur Krishnappagowda; Ajay Kumar Kariyappa
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  1-(2,5-Dichloro-3-thien-yl)ethanone: infinite sheets mediated by O⋯Cl halogen bonds.

Authors:  William T A Harrison; C S Chidan Kumar; H S Yathirajan; A N Mayekar; B Narayana
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-09-04

5.  (E)-1-(2,5-Dichloro-3-thien-yl)-3-[4-(dimethyl-amino)phen-yl]prop-2-en-1-one.

Authors:  Grzegorz Dutkiewicz; C S Chidan Kumar; H S Yathirajan; B Narayana; Maciej Kubicki
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-04-24

6.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

7.  Structural correlation of some heterocyclic chalcone analogues and evaluation of their antioxidant potential.

Authors:  C S Chidan Kumar; Wan-Sin Loh; Chin Wei Ooi; Ching Kheng Quah; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20

9.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01

10.  Heteroaryl chalcones: design, synthesis, X-ray crystal structures and biological evaluation.

Authors:  C S Chidan Kumar; Wan-Sin Loh; Chin Wei Ooi; Ching Kheng Quah; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.