| Literature DB >> 30115910 |
Jittisa Ketkaew1, Wen Chen1, Hui Wang2, Amit Datye1, Meng Fan1, Gabriela Pereira3, Udo D Schwarz1, Ze Liu4, Rui Yamada5, Wojciech Dmowski2, Mark D Shattuck1,6, Corey S O'Hern1,7,8, Takeshi Egami2,9,10, Eran Bouchbinder11, Jan Schroers12.
Abstract
The fracture toughness of glassy materials remains poorly understood. In large part, this is due to the disordered, intrinsically non-equilibrium nature of the glass structure, which challenges its theoretical description and experimental determination. We show that the notch fracture toughness of metallic glasses exhibits an abrupt toughening transition as a function of a well-controlled fictive temperature (Tf), which characterizes the average glass structure. The ordinary temperature, which has been previously associated with a ductile-to-brittle transition, is shown to play a secondary role. The observed transition is interpreted to result from a competition between the Tf-dependent plastic relaxation rate and an applied strain rate. Consequently, a similar toughening transition as a function of strain rate is predicted and demonstrated experimentally. The observed mechanical toughening transition bears strong similarities to the ordinary glass transition and explains the previously reported large scatter in fracture toughness data and ductile-to-brittle transitions.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30115910 PMCID: PMC6095891 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05682-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1The notch fracture toughness of metallic glasses exhibits a dramatic transition as a function of fictive temperature, Tf. a The notch fracture toughness KQ, normalized by its minimal value KQ,min, as a function of Tf, normalized by the glass temperature Tg, for Zr44Ti11Ni10Cu10Be25 (black squares), Pd43Cu27Ni10P20 (red circles), and Pt57.5Cu14.7Ni5.3P22.5 (blue triangles). The error bars represent 1 standard deviation of five samples per data point. The dashed lines serve as a guide to the eye. b KQ for Zr44Ti11Ni10Cu10Be25 as a function of Tf (measured at room temperature, black symbols—bottom axis) and T (red symbols—top axis, measured at T) with Tf = 683 K > (red circles) and Tf = 583 K < (red triangles). The dashed lines represent polynomial fits of the data. c The plastic zone ahead of the notch root just prior to failure of Zr44Ti11Ni10Cu10Be25 for several Tf. Dimension lines indicate the plastic zone size. For Tf < , the plastic zone is small, while for Tf > it is significantly larger. The plastic zone is symmetric with respect to the main axis of the notch (darker areas are optical effects). The scale bars are 100 μm. d The fracture morphology of Zr44Ti11Ni10Cu10Be25 for various Tf. As the threshold is surpassed (top right), the fracture morphology changes from fractal-like structures (characteristic of brittle-like fracture) to river-like patterns (characteristic of ductile-like fracture). The scale bars are 50 μm
Fig. 2Structural and response quantities of the Zr44Ti11Ni10Cu10Be25 metallic glass exhibit gradual changes as a function of Tf. a Enthalpy recovery as a function of Tf obtained from differential scanning calorimetry of SENT fracture toughness samples. The error bars are quantified by 1 standard deviation from three samples. b The shear modulus G as a function of Tf, obtained from dynamic mechanical analysis at room temperature. (inset) G as a function of T at fixed Tf = 593 K. c The amplitude of the first peak of the pair distribution function G(rp) as a function of Tf. (inset) The pair distribution function G(r) for the two extreme cases: Tf = 573 and 683 K. d The anisotropy ∣Y∣of the pair distribution function under a compressive stress of 1 GPa as a function of Tf (see Methods for the precise definition of ∣Y∣)
Fig. 3The fracture toughness of metallic glasses also exhibits a toughening transition with decreasing strain rate. KQ as a function of strain rate for Zr44Ti11Ni10Cu10Be25 with Tf/Tg = 1.06 (Tf > , black squares) and Tf/Tg = 0.95 (Tf < , red circles). The error bars represent 1 standard deviation calculated from three samples
Fig. 4Analogy between the conventional glass transition and the mechanical glass transition based on a crossover of time scales. a The conventional glass transition, probed by the dependence of the enthalpy on T, originates from a competition between the internal structural relaxation time, τSR, and the external time scale set by the cooling rate, . The glass transition occurs approximately at τSR ≈ . b In analogy to the conventional glass transition, the mechanical glass transition (probed by the dependence of the fracture toughness on Tf) originates from the competition between the plastic relaxation time scale, τplastic, and the (near notch) deformation time scale, , which is proportional to the applied strain rate. c A ductile-to-brittle transition can also be observed as a function of temperature, as τplastic is also a weak function of T, but it is significantly less pronounced than the toughening transition as a function of Tf