| Literature DB >> 30115076 |
Yuntao Zhou1, Mengdi Liu2, Jinrong Li2, Bing Wu2, Wei Tian3, Lu Shi2, Jing Zhang2, Zening Sun2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated the baseline characterization of cardiovascular disease (CVD)-derived circulating miR-221-3p/222-3p in isolated low HDL-C phenotype (ILHP) to enhance our understanding on their molecular pathological pattern prior to disease onset.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular disease; Circulating microRNAs; Clinical translation; Isolated risk phenotype
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30115076 PMCID: PMC6097213 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-018-0842-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Circulating miRNAs levels in isolated low HDL-C phenotype. Circulating miR-221-3p levels (a) are increased in isolated low HDL-C phenotype, whereas circulating miR-222-3p levels (b) are decreased in isolated low HDL-C phenotype. Isolated low HDL: Isolated low HDL-C phenotype; Normal: Normal lipid phenotype. miR-221-3p levels (c) are significantly increased in female subjects with both isolated low HDL-C phenotype and normal lipid phenotype in comparison with those of male subgroups. d Circulating miR-222-3p levels are significantly increased in either male or female isolated low HDL-C phenotype compared with the corresponding normal lipid phenotypes, respectively. The p value is adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) method in multiple comparisons
Fig. 2The correlations between circulating miRNA levels and serum HDL-C levels. Circulating miR-221-3p levels (a) are positively correlated with serum HDL-C levels, whereas circulating miR-222-3p levels (b) are inversely correlated with serum HDL-C levels in asymptomatic subjects (n = 174)
Associations of circulating miRNA indexes with isolated low HDL-C phenotype
| Models | miR-221-3p | miR-222-3p | miR-221-3p/222-3p Ct ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | ||||
| Crude | 0.67 (0.49, 0.93) | 0.018 | 5.45 (1.99, 14.88) | < 0.001 | 996.49 (27.34, 36,324.83) | < 0.001 |
| Adjusted, modela | 0.67 (0.45, 1.00) | 0.051 | 8.42 (2.53, 27.98) | < 0.001 | 5617.96 (59.09, 534,118.17) | < 0.001 |
a Model: adjusted for clinical laboratory indexes including LDL-C, TG, ALT, AST, GGT, FG, HGB, PLT, and absolute counts of WBC, RBC, neutrophil and lymphocyte, except for HDL-C. OR odd ratio, CI confidence interval
The performance of circulating miR-222-3p and miR-221/.222 Ct ratio for predicting isolated low HDL-C phenotype
| Models | AUC (95%CI) | Cut-off value | Specificity | Sensitivity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| miR-222-3p | 0.648 (0.566, 0.730) | < 0.001 | 0.559 | 0.837 | 0.432 |
| The miR-221-3p/miR-222-3p ratio | 0.678 (0.598, 0.758) | < 0.001 | 0.562 | 0.767 | 0.568 |
| Clinical model | 0.771 (0.702, 0.840) | < 0.001 | 0.462 | 0.698 | 0.761 |
| Clinical model + miR-222-3pa | 0.816 (0.754, 0.879) b | < 0.001 | 0.413 | 0.663 | 0.879 |
| Clinical model + miR221-3p/miR-222-3p ratioa | 0.813 (0.751, 0.876) b | < 0.001 | 0.423 | 0.686 | 0.818 |
AUC area under the curve. Best threshold of Cut-off value were estimated using youden method. a The AUC, sensitivities and specificities of the combination model of miR-222-3p and clinical model was compared with that of clinical model. bp < 0.05
Fig. 3The ratio of miR-221-3p and miR-222-3p and isolated low HDL-C phenotype. a The original Ct ratio of circulating miR-221-3p to miR-222-3p are significantly elevated in isolated low HDL-C phenotype. b Compared with the corresponding normal lipid phenotype, male subjects with isolated low HDL phenotype exhibit the increased miR-221-3p/222-3p ratio, while the female isolated low HDL-C phenotype have a increased trendence. c The original Ct ratio of miR-221-3p to miR-222-3p are inversely correlated with serum HDL-C levels in asymptomatic subjects (n = 174). The p value is adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) method in multiple comparisons
The AUCs’ performance for distinguishing subjects with isolated low HDL-C phenotype in gender-based analysis
| Models | AUC (95%CI) | Cut-off value | Specificity | Sensitivity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male subjects | |||||
| miR-222-3p | 0.671 (0.566, 0.730) | 0.002 | 0.474 | 0.667 | 0.622 |
| miR-221-3p/miR-222-3p ratio | 0.731 (0.626, 0.836) | < 0.001 | 0.564 | 0.800 | 0.622 |
| Clinical model | 0.759 (0.659, 0.859) | < 0.001 | 0.630 | 0.867 | 0.556 |
| Clinical model + miR-222-3pa | 0.813 (0.721, 0.904) | < 0.001 | 0.522 | 0.800 | 0.778 |
| Clinical model + miR-221-3p/miR-222-3p ratioa | 0.851 (0.770, 0.933)c | < 0.001 | 0.430 | 0.756 | 0.889 |
| Female subjects | |||||
| miR-222-3p | 0.623 (0.501, 0.745) | 0.026 | 0.600 | 0.878 | 0.417 |
| miR-221-3p/miR-222-3p ratio | 0.624 (0.503, 0.745) | 0.025 | 0.566 | 0.780 | 0.512 |
| Clinical model | 0.808 (0.714, 0.901) | < 0.001 | 0.548 | 0.854 | 0.674 |
| Clinical model + miR-222-3pb | 0.847 (0.761, 0.934) | < 0.001 | 0.421 | 0.780 | 0.837 |
| Clinical model + miR-221-3p/miR-222-3p ratiob | 0.841 (0.756, 0.926) | < 0.001 | 0.556 | 0.853 | 0.721 |
AUC area under the curve. Best threshold of Cut-off value were estimated using youden method
a, b The AUC, sensitivities and specificities of the combination model of either miR-222-3p or miR-221-3p/miR-222-3p ratio and clinical indexes were compared with that of the predictive clinical model for male and female subjects, respectively
cp < 0.05