| Literature DB >> 30115046 |
Takashi Hoshino1, Kunikazu Tsuji2, Hiroaki Onuma1, Mio Udo1, Hiroko Ueki1, Masako Akiyama3, Kahaer Abula1, Hiroki Katagiri1, Kazumasa Miyatake1, Toshihumi Watanabe1, Ichiro Sekiya4, Hideyuki Koga1, Takeshi Muneta1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The major complaint of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is persistent pain. Unlike acute inflammatory pain, persistent pain is usually difficult to manage since its pathology is not fully understood. To elucidate the underlying mechanisms of persistent pain, we established 2 different inflammation-induced arthritis models by injecting monoiodo-acetic acid (MIA) into the joint cavity and performed integrated analyses of the structural changes in the synovial tissue and articular cartilage, sensory neuron rearrangement, and pain avoidance behavior in a rat arthritis model.Entities:
Keywords: CGRP; Monoiodo-acetic acid; Osteoarthritis model; Persistent pain
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30115046 PMCID: PMC6097215 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2221-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Study design. The right knee joint had an intra-articular injection of MIA at day 0. The left knee had PBS as a control. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluations (hematoxylin and eosin/safranin O staining and calcitonin gene-related peptide staining) were performed at 5, 14, and 28 days post-injection. The pain avoidance behavior tests (incapacitance and von Frey) were performed as indicated
Fig. 2Pain avoidance behavior tests. a Incapacitance tests were performed and % of weight on the ipsilateral limb was calculated according to the indicated equation. b The time course changes of % weight on the ipsilateral limb was plotted. Asterisk indicated that the values were statistically significant compared to the pre-experimental values. There were 6 samples at each time point. c Mean and standard deviation values in panel B are indicated. Asterisks indicate that the values were statistically significant compared to pre-experimental values. The far right column indicated the p values between the low- and high-dose groups. d Time course changes of paw withdrawal threshold measured using von Frey hairs. Asterisks indicate that the values were statistically significant between ipsilateral side and contralateral side. There were 6 samples in each time point. e Mean and SD values in panel D are indicated. Asterisks indicate that the values were statistically significant compared the pre-experimental values (day 0). The 4th and 6th columns indicate the p values of the ipsilateral and contralateral limbs. The far right column indicates the p values of the low- and high-dose group at each time point
Fig. 3Inflammatory response of the synovial membrane and infrapatellar fat pad after the monoiodo-acetic acid injection. a Representative images of hematoxylin and eosin staining of sagittal sections of synovial tissues at each time point. The area indicated in the black box in low magnification image is enlarged and indicated. b, c Infrapatellar fat pad inflammation score was blindly evaluated by two independent researchers and data are presented in these panels. There were 6 samples at each time point. Four sections were randomly selected from each sample and evaluated. The median values and quartiles were recorded. The asterisks indicate the statistically significant values
Fig. 4Distribution of CGRP-positive nerve fibers in IFP and L4 DRG. a Representative immunohistochemical images of the knee joint at 28 days after the injection of MIA. Arrowheads in red indicate CGRP-positive nerve fibers. b Representative images of L4 DRG at day 28 post-MIA injection. The red signal indicates neuronal cell bodies projected from the knee joint (left column, FG). Neural cells positive for CGRP are indicated in green (middle column). Merged images are shown in the right column. Arrows in white indicate the CGRP-positive nerve cells projected from the knee joint. c, d Differences in innervation density between the MIA and control sides. Ten different areas of 0.01 mm2 were randomly selected in the parenchymal region of IFP in each section. CGRP-positive nerve fibers > 0.03 mm were counted. There were 6 samples at each time point and 2 sections were randomly selected in each sample. Data are represented as mean and SD values. e Differences in innervation density between ipsilateral and contralateral indicated in (c) and (d) were calculated in each time point (innervation density of MIA subtracted by innervation density of control) and plotted. f, g The percentage of CGRP-positive neurons among the FG-labeled neurons. There were 6 samples in each time point. Four sections were randomly selected from each sample and the mean ± SD values were recorded (n = 6). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences. h Differences in innervation density between ipsilateral and contralateral indicated in (f) and (g) were calculated in each time point (innervation density of MIA subtracted by innervation density of control) and plotted. CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide; DRG, dorsal root ganglion; FG, fluorogold; IFP, infrapatellar fat pad; MIA, monoiodo-acetic acid
Fig. 5Articular cartilage changes after the MIA injection. a Representative images of Safranin-O staining of sagittal sections of the medial femoral and tibial condyles at each time point. b, c Osteoarthritis Research Society International histological scores were blindly evaluated by two independent researchers and data are presented in these panels. There were 6 samples at each time point. Four sections were randomly selected from each sample and the mean values were recorded. Median and quartile values in panel C are indicated. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences. MIA, monoiodo-acetic acid