Literature DB >> 30112736

Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in the Medical Intensive Care Unit: a Survey of Caregivers' Perspectives.

Debbie W Chen1, Angela M Gerolamo2, Elissa Harmon3, Anna Bistline4, Shoshana Sicks5, Lauren Collins5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research on caregivers, defined as designated family members or support persons, in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) has primarily focused on their emotional needs and experiences, thus leaving a gap in knowledge related to their perceptions of team dynamics.
OBJECTIVE: To examine caregivers' perceptions of team interactions and competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) and overall satisfaction with the MICU team.
METHODS: The Support Person Jefferson Teamwork Observation Guide (JTOG)™ was administered to a convenience sample of caregivers in the MICU at a large urban academic medical center between May 2016 and December 2016.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one JTOG surveys were completed. Caregivers agreed on the importance of healthcare professionals working together as a team to provide patient care (3.97 out of 4.0 on Likert response scale where 1 is "Not at all important" and 4 is 'Extremely important") and were satisfied with the MICU team (3.74 out of 4.0), positively evaluating the four core competencies for IPCP (3.55 for values/ethics, 3.58 for interprofessional communication, 3.61 for roles/responsibilities, and 3.64 for teams/teamwork) and the patient/family-centeredness sub-competency (3.58 out of 4.0). There was a strong positive correlation between caregivers' Global JTOG scores and overall satisfaction with the MICU team (r = 0.596, p < 0.01). Caregivers' comments about factors that affected their experience focused on aspects of interprofessional communication and patient/family-centeredness.
CONCLUSION: Findings underscore the importance of interprofessional communication and providing patient/family-centered care. Assessing caregivers' perceptions of IPCP can provide a critical lens into team functioning and, thus, be used to identify teams' strengths as well as opportunities for improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caregivers’ perceptions; clinical skills assessment; collaborative practice; communication; critical care; evaluation; interprofessional education; teamwork

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30112736      PMCID: PMC6153212          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4623-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  11 in total

1.  Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005.

Authors:  Judy E Davidson; Karen Powers; Kamyar M Hedayat; Mark Tieszen; Alexander A Kon; Eric Shepard; Vicki Spuhler; I David Todres; Mitchell Levy; Juliana Barr; Raj Ghandi; Gregory Hirsch; Deborah Armstrong
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; Thomas W Nolan; John Whittington
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Contextualizing critical care family needs through triangulation: an Australian study.

Authors:  G Burr
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.072

Review 4.  Family needs and involvement in the intensive care unit: a literature review.

Authors:  Abbas Saleh Al-Mutair; Virginia Plummer; Anthony O'Brien; Rosemary Clerehan
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  [Quality and humanization of the attendance in Intensive Care Medicine. What the parents think's?].

Authors:  Rodrigo Ambros Wallau; Hélio Penna Guimarães; Luiz Fernando Dos Reis Falcão; Renato Delascio Lopes; Patrícia Helena da Rocha Leal; Ana Paula Resque Senna; Rosa Goldstein Alheira; Flávia Ribeiro Machado; José Luiz Gomes do Amaral
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2006-03

6.  Family members' informal roles in end-of-life decision making in adult intensive care units.

Authors:  Jill R Quinn; Madeline Schmitt; Judith Gedney Baggs; Sally A Norton; Mary T Dombeck; Craig R Sellers
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 7.  A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39.

Authors:  Scott Reeves; Simon Fletcher; Hugh Barr; Ivan Birch; Sylvain Boet; Nigel Davies; Angus McFadyen; Josette Rivera; Simon Kitto
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Jefferson Teamwork Observation Guide (JTOG): An Instrument to Observe Teamwork Behaviors.

Authors:  Kevin J Lyons; Carolyn Giordano; Elizabeth Speakman; Kellie Smith; June A Horowitz
Journal:  J Allied Health       Date:  2016

9.  A Comparison of Usage and Outcomes Between Nurse Practitioner and Resident-Staffed Medical ICUs.

Authors:  Rachel Scherzer; Marie P Dennis; Beth Ann Swan; Mani S Kavuru; David A Oxman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: results of a multiple center study.

Authors:  Daren K Heyland; Graeme M Rocker; Peter M Dodek; Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Elsie Konopad; Deborah J Cook; Sharon Peters; Joan E Tranmer; Christopher J O'Callaghan
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.