Literature DB >> 30112482

Reliability Assessment of Orthodontic Apps for Cephalometrics.

Sertaç Aksakallı1, Hilal Yılancı1, Erhan Görükmez1, Sabri İlhan Ramoğlu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of cephalometric measurements using iPad apps called CephNinja and SmartCeph Pro. The measurements were compared with the measurements obtained using Dolphin Imaging computer software.
METHODS: Twenty digital cephalometric radiographs were randomly selected from the archives and traced using the CephNinja app, SmartCeph Pro app, and Dolphin Imaging software. Twenty-one landmarks and 16 measurements were performed in each program. The statistical analysis was conducted using the Bland-Altman analysis at a significance level of 0.05.
RESULTS: For the CephNinja app, there were seven measurements that were in accordance with Dolphin Imaging software. For the SmartCeph Pro app, six measurements were in accordance with Dolphin software. Both apps gave better results for angular measurements than linear ones.
CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that, although they are user-friendly, orthodontic apps for cephalometrics are not equal with Dolphin software now and need to be developed to be more reliable for most of the measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cephalometrics; apps; iPad; smartphones

Year:  2016        PMID: 30112482      PMCID: PMC6007603          DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.1618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Orthod        ISSN: 2148-9505


  15 in total

1.  Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks.

Authors:  J K Liu; Y T Chen; K S Cheng
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.

Authors:  Y J Chen; S K Chen; H F Chang; K C Chen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.

Authors:  Manuel O Lagravère; Corey Low; Carlos Flores-Mir; Raymund Chung; Jason P Carey; Giseon Heo; Paul W Major
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Reliability of cranial base measurements on lateral skull radiographs.

Authors:  H Arponen; H Elf; M Evälahti; J Waltimo-Sirén
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Precision of cephalometric analysis via fully and semiautomatic evaluation of digital lateral cephalographs.

Authors:  T Sommer; R Ciesielski; J Erbersdobler; W Orthuber; H Fischer-Brandies
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Orthodontic apps for smartphones.

Authors:  Parmjit Singh
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2013-09

7.  Efficacy of a Newly Designed Cephalometric Analysis Software for McNamara Analysis in Comparison with Dolphin Software.

Authors:  Mahtab Nouri; Shadi Hamidiaval; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban; Mohammad Basafa; Mohammad Fahim
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-01

8.  Orthodontic apps at fingertips.

Authors:  Mayuresh Jagannath Baheti; Nandlal Toshniwal
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  'It's on my iPhone': attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Sean Wallace; Marcia Clark; Jonathan White
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  A hard tissue cephalometric comparative study between hand tracing and computerized tracing.

Authors:  Ramachandra Prabhakar; P Rajakumar; M K Karthikeyan; R Saravanan; N Raj Vikram; Adarsh Reddy
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2014-07
View more
  7 in total

1.  Concurrent validity and reliability of cephalometric analysis using smartphone apps and computer software.

Authors:  Christos Livas; Konstantina Delli; Frederik K L Spijkervet; Arjan Vissink; Pieter U Dijkstra
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  The reliability and reproducibility of an Android cephalometric smartphone application in comparison with the conventional method.

Authors:  Obada M Zamrik; Haluk İşeri
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Web-based Fully Automated Cephalometric Analysis: Comparisons between App-aided, Computerized, and Manual Tracings.

Authors:  Pamir Meriç; Julia Naoumova
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-08-11

4.  An investigation into the reliability of a mobile app designed to assess orthodontic treatment need and severity.

Authors:  Sukbir Nandra; Nicola Crawford; Daniel Burford; Nikolaos Pandis; Martyn T Cobourne; Jadbinder Seehra
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.727

5.  The accuracy and reliability of WebCeph for cephalometric analysis.

Authors:  Yassir A Yassir; Aya R Salman; Sarah A Nabbat
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2021-09-22

6.  Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software.

Authors:  Gökhan Çoban; Taner Öztürk; Nizami Hashimli; Ahmet Yağci
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-08-15

7.  Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontic Smart Application for Treatment Coaching and Its Impact on Clinical Performance of Patients Monitored with AI-TeleHealth System.

Authors:  Andrej Thurzo; Veronika Kurilová; Ivan Varga
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.