Literature DB >> 30112468

Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics.

Furkan Dindaroğlu1, Enver Yetkiner1.   

Abstract

The advent of three-dimensional (3D) imaging technology has caused a significant change in the diagnostic approach practiced in dentistry, and in particular, orthodontics. Although conventional imaging methods such as orthopantomography and lateral cephalometric and anteroposterior graphs provide sufficient information in mild to moderate orthodontic anomalies, 3D imaging can be a necessity in severe skeletal anomalies or tooth impactions. Computed tomography (CT) has been frequently used when detailed 3D imaging is necessary despite its relatively high cost, low vertical resolution, and high dose of radiation. In contrast to conventional CT application, the development of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) technology has had important advantages over the conventional method, such as minimization of the radiation dose, image accuracy, rapid scan time, fewer image artifacts, chair-side image display, and real-time analysis. These advantages have provided dental practitioners the opportunity to benefit more frequently from 3D imaging by relatively diminishing radiation dose considerations, financial burden, and availability, in particular. Therefore, the aim of this review is to highlight the current understanding of CBCT practice in orthodontics and to summarize clinically relevant conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D imaging; Cone beam computed tomography; orthodontics

Year:  2016        PMID: 30112468      PMCID: PMC6007705          DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.15-00026R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Orthod        ISSN: 2148-9505


  33 in total

1.  Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Allan G Farman; William C Scarfe
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice.

Authors:  William C Scarfe; Allan G Farman; Predag Sukovic
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Laurie Carter; Allan G Farman; James Geist; William C Scarfe; Christos Angelopoulos; Madhu K Nair; Charles F Hildebolt; Donald Tyndall; Michael Shrout
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2008-10

4.  Cone-beam CT: applications in orthodontics.

Authors:  Steven L Hechler
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10

5.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Practical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics.

Authors:  James K Mah; John C Huang; HyeRan Choo
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  Three-dimensional assessment of impacted canines and root resorption using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Snehlata Oberoi; Stephanie Knueppel
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2011-06-25

8.  In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.

Authors:  Vandana Kumar; John Ludlow; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; André Mol
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.

Authors:  Danielle R Periago; William C Scarfe; Mazyar Moshiri; James P Scheetz; Anibal M Silveira; Allan G Farman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Incidental findings arising with cone beam computed tomography imaging of the orthodontic patient.

Authors:  Sheelagh A Rogers; Nicholas Drage; Peter Durning
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  Orthodontists' criteria for prescribing cone-beam computed tomography-a multi-country survey.

Authors:  Grasielle Manoel Caiado; Karine Evangelista; Maria do Carmo Matias Freire; Fabiana Tolentino Almeida; Camila Pacheco-Pereira; Carlos Flores-Mir; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruelas; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Flavia Preda; Guy Willems; Reinhilde Jacobs; José Valladares-Neto; Maria Alves Garcia Silva
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics.

Authors:  Ahmad Abdelkarim
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.