In vitro screening of cytotoxic activity of euphol from Euphorbia tirucalli on a large panel of human cancer-derived cell lines.

A large number of classic antineoplastic agents are derived from plants. Euphorbia tirucalli L. (Euphorbiaceae) is a subtropical and tropical plant, used in Brazilian folk medicine against many diseases, including cancer, yet little is known about its true anticancer properties. The present study evaluated the antitumor effect of the tetracyclic triterpene alcohol, euphol, the main constituent of E. tirucalli in a panel of 73 human cancer lines from 15 tumor types. The biological effect of euphol in pancreatic cells was also assessed. The combination index was further used to explore euphol interactions with standard drugs. Euphol showed a cytotoxicity effect against several cancer cell lines (IC50 range, 1.41-38.89 µM), particularly in esophageal squamous cell (11.08 µM) and pancreatic carcinoma cells (6.84 µM), followed by prostate, melanoma, and colon cancer. Cytotoxicity effects were seen in all cancer cell lines, with more than half deemed highly sensitive. Euphol inhibited proliferation, motility and colony formation in pancreatic cancer cells. Importantly, euphol exhibited synergistic interactions with gemcitabine and paclitaxel in pancreatic and esophageal cell lines, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this study constitutes the largest in vitro screening of euphol efficacy on cancer cell lines and revealed its in vitro anti-cancer properties, particularly in pancreatic and esophageal cell lines, suggesting that euphol, either as a single agent or in combination with conventional chemotherapy, is a potential anti-cancer drug.

Introduction

The 20th century saw an extraordinary breakthrough of natural products, especially regarding the application of plants in the field of oncology, enabling the discovery of several substances currently used in cancer therapy (1–3). Plants secondary metabolites and their semi-synthetic derivatives play an important role in current oncology treatment. Of the 250 drugs considered as basic and essential by the World Health Organization (WHO), 11% are derived from medicinal plants (4). Within this list, there are drugs that constitute the backbone of cancer therapy as vinka alcaloids (vinblastine and vincristine), camptothecin derivatives (topotecan and irinotecan), epipodophyllotoxin (etoposide and teniposide), and, more recently, taxanes (docetaxel, paclitaxel and cabazitaxel). Despite these facts, it is estimated that less than 2% of higher plants have been analyzed for their antineoplastic activity, due to the time and resource intensive phenotype-based drug discovery process (1,5).

Brazil has one of largest plant diversity in world, with a myriad of opportunities for phytochemicals production, yet; only approximately 8% it has been studied (6,7). Extracts of species from the genus Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) are used by traditional healers for the treatment of ulcers, warts and other diseases (7,8). The Euphorbia genus is worldwide spread, used as decorative plant and comprises thousands of different species. Some species of this genus have triggered interest about potential antineoplastic activity, partly based on anedoctic reports stemming from traditional medicine (7–9). Interestingly, a derived from E. peplus, the ingenol mebutate (ingenol-3-angelate, PEP005, Picato®; LEO Pharma A/S, Ballerup, Denmark), was recently approved by the FDA for actinic keratosis treatment, a premalignant lesion for sun-related squamous-cell carcinoma (10,11).

Amongst the species under Euphorbia genus, E. tirucalli has a large use in traditional medicine (7). The main constituent of E. tirucalli sap is euphol, a tetracyclic triterpene alcohol, which has shown anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and analgesic properties (12,13). In mice model of acute colitis and arthritic, euphol showed an anti-inflammatory effect (14). Euphol was also reported to exhibit antinociceptive properties in both inflammatory and neuropathic pain of mice and rats models (15). Moreover, euphol showed to inhibit the reverse transcriptase in human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

Recently, euphol was suggested to display an anti-cancer effect. In vitro studies in breast and gastric tumor cell reported that euphol decreased cell viability (16,17). In an in vivo study of ascitic Ehrlich tumor model, treatment with E. tirucalli hydroalcoholic extract (ETHE) leads a higher animal survival (18). These studies have increased the therapeutic interest of E. tirucalli compounds, mainly euphol in oncology. On the other hand, some reports suggest that the exposure to E. tirucalli crude can be a risk factor for Burkitt's lymphoma, since it act as a genotoxic agent, especially when it contains phorbol ester (7,19). Therefore, further studies are needed to elucidate the potential therapeutic use of euphol.

Herein, we aimed to study the antitumor effect of euphol on a large panel of human cancer cell lines from a high variety of tumor types, in order to provide insight into the tailoring designing of euphol-based therapies for cancer patients.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and cell culture

Seventy-three immortalized human cancer cell lines from 15 solid tumor models were analysed (Table I). The U87MG was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC HTB-14; Manassas, VA, USA). Authentication of all cell lines was carried out by the Center for Molecular Diagnostics of Barretos Cancer Hospital (São Paulo, Brazil) as previously reported (20). Shorthly, short tandem repeat (STR) DNA typing was performed according to the International Reference Standard for Authentication of Human Cell Lines previously described (21). The identity of all cell lines was confirmed by genotyping, with the exception of U373, which was shown to be a sub-clone of U251 cell line. All the cell lines were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM 1X, high glucose; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) or RPMI-1640 (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin solution (P/S; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), at 37°C and 5% CO2.

Table I.

Euphol IC50 values and percentual of GI at a fixed euphol concentration (15 µM).

Cell line	Mean IC50	SD	GI (%) at 15 µM[a]	GIS	SD	Tumor type
T47D	38.89	9.27	31.8	R	7.0	Breast
MDA-MB-231	9.08	0.87	56.7	MS	14.0
MDA-MB-468	30.89	6.22	27.5	R	10.3
BT20	8.96	2.92	66.7	HS	2.9
HS587T	18.15	8.91	61.4	HS	25.5
MCF-7	18.76	3.43	52.6	MS	14.1
MCF7/AZ	33.42	5.01	22.8	R	11.6
JHU-O22	26.35	7.31	5.6	R	5.1	Head and neck
HN13	8.89	6.53	69.2	HS	6.0
SCC25	6.65	3.54	74.2	HS	3.6
SCC4	19.82	1.95	31.5	R	9.9
SCC14	15.81	2.63	53.3	MS	6.5
FADU	20.17	2.68	46.7	MS	9.2
SW480	5.79	0.05	80.7	HS	4.1	Colon
SW620	10.02	4.54	68.8	HS	9.2
CO115	9.58	2.35	74.1	HS	8.3
HCT15	5.47	0.81	92.3	HS	1.6
HT29	6.52	1.37	78.1	HS	4.4
SK-CO-10	17.53	7.13	58.0	MS	11.9
DLD1	2.56	1.18	80.0	HS	3.9
LOVO	11.49	2.39	63.2	HS	5.5
DIFI	11.38	2.86	67.9	HS	4.3
Caco2	35.19	5.11	25.1	R	10.0
U87-MG	26.41	3.19	6.7	R	12.7	Glioma
U373	30.48	3.51	10.0	R	12.1
U251	29.01	7.82	23.3	R	9.5
GAMG	8.73	1.87	90.1	HS	0.5
SW1088	27.12	2.55	7.2	R	7.2
SW1783	19.62	1.42	44.2	MS	9.6
RES186	16.70	3.72	41.6	MS	14.8
RES259	10.34	4.08	70.6	HS	8.6
KNS42	19.94	0.27	23.3	R	6.2
UW479	15.26	4.83	53.4	MS	15.3
SF188	5.98	2.42	74.4	HS	4.3
PC-3	11.95	4.47	66.7	HS	9.6	Prostate
LNCaP	1.41	0.45	67.7	HS	4.6
T24	30.72	0.30	9.2	R	3.1	Blader
5637	4.83	1.61	88.3	HS	2.4
HT1376	25.25	0.41	9.9	R	8.5
MCR	7.40	2.77	59.1	MS	7.0
DAOY	5.72	1.37	79.3	HS	1.5
ONS76	21.72	2.07	10.9	R	16.1	Meduloblastoma
JEG3	16.65	0.86	61.5	HS	7.6	Choriocarcinome
A431	17.79	3.41	40.2	MS	14.8	Epidermoid
H292	13.25	2.16	52.6	MS	5.7	Lung
SKMES1	25.62	0.79	24.9	R	7.4
A549	11.01	3.11	60.0	HS	10.4
SK-LU-1	22.83	2.06	4.2	R	8.7
SIHA	24.74	3.65	6.7	R	5.9	Cervical
CASKI	24.74	2.67	19.3	R	13.1
C33A	21.32	4.21	52.6	MS	1.7
HELA	17.55	3.41	44.6	MS	18.0
KYSE30	3.52	1.28	71.7	HS	5.7	Oesophagus
KYSE70	8.77	0.74	78.8	HS	1.8
KYSE270	10.71	3.95	66.9	HS	12.5
KYSE410	4.35	2.03	85.5	HS	3.4
Mia PaCa-2	8.46	0.39	79.9	HS	3.2	Pancreatic
PANC-1	21.47	1.83	49.0	MS	6.6
PSN-1	3.71	0.17	63.5	HS	4.9
BXPC-3	5.47	1.64	84.9	HS	2.8
Capan-1	16.33	2.06	61.0	HS	8.5
COLO858	14.02	2.94	55.8	MS	7.5	Melanoma
COLO679	8.93	4.45	66.8	HS	9.0
A375	9.67	1.86	63.6	HS	3.9
WM1617	16.32	2.95	55.1	MS	11.3
WM9	9.67	4.11	75.8	HS	6.9
WM852	7.61	1.08	77.4	HS	4.0
WM278	27.46	1.48	30.5	R	18.1
WM35	12.40	3.57	63.9	HS	14.2
WN793	5.96	0.26	73.3	HS	8.0
SKMEL-37	10.07	0.06	69.0	HS	9.9
PA-1	7.97	3.03	68.3	HS	3.4	Ovary
SW626	30.40	5.61	23.9	R	11.5

GI was defined in comparison with untreated controls. Samples exhibiting more than 60% GI in the presence of 15 µM euphol were classified as HS; MS when located between 40–60%; and R when showing less than 40%. GIS, Growth Inhibition Score; SD, standard deviation; GI, Growth Inhibition; HS, highly sensitive; MS, moderately sensitive; R, resistant.

Preparation and compound dilution

The sap from E. tirucalli L. (accepted name record 82539-Sp. Pl. 452 1753.) was initially extracted with hexane and the resulting precipitate was extracted with n-butanol. The most lipophilic compounds present in the butanol fraction were purified by means of high performance liquid chromatography analysis (HPLC). Further purification of the compounds was carried out using a Sephadex G75 column in a mixture of hexane-ethyl acetate. Recrystallization of the acetate fraction from butanol gave 3.5 g crystals, comprising euphol acetate and filtrate (1.5 g). The chemical structure of the euphol, representeted in Fig. 1, was determined by elemental analyses of 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectral data, and by comparison with their respective authentic compounds using Chemdraw software version 7.0 (22,23) (PubChem CID: 441678). The 1H NMR (500 MHz) and 13C NMR (126 MHz) spectra were recorded on a Bruker 500 MHz instrument. The MS spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer instrument, model API 150 and run in ES-MS positive mode: MH+ 427 m/e, MH+ _H2O 409 m/e. The NMR parameters were 13C NMR (CDCl3): 15.7 (C29), 15.8 (C18), 17.9 (C26), 19.1 (C21), 19.2 (C6), 20.4 (C19), 21.7 (C11), 24.9 (C30), 25.0 (C23), 25.9 (C27), 28.0 (C2, C7), 28.2 (C28), 28.3 (C16), 30.0 (C15), 31.1 (C12), 35.4 (C1), 35.7 (C22), 36.1 (C20), 37.5 (C10), 39.2 (C4), 44.3 (C13), 49.9 (C17), 50.2 (C14), 51.2 (C5), 79.2 (C3), 125.4 (C24), 131.1 (C25), 133.8 (C9), 134.3 (C8) and 1H NMR (CDCl3): 0.75 (3H, s, H-18), 0.80 (3H, s, H-29), 0.85 (3H, d, H-21), 0.87 (3H, s, H-30), 0.95 (3H, s, H-19), 1.00 (3H, s, H-28), 1.50 (3H, s, H-26), 1.68 (3H, s, H-27), 3.23 (1H, dd, H-3), 5.09 (1H, bt, H-24). The tetracyclic triterpene euphol used in this study showed >95% purity.

Figure 1.

Chemical structure of euphol.

The extract fraction was initially dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at a concentration of 50 mg/ml and stored at −20°C. The intermediate dilutions of the experimental compound were prepared to obtain a concentration of 1% DMSO.

Cell viability assay

The cytotoxicity effect of euphol was assessed by Cell Titer 96 Aqueous cell proliferation assay (MTS assay; Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions as previous described (20,24). For experiments, the cells (third and fifth passage) were plated into 96-well plates (until a maximum 5×103 cells/well). The plate was incubated overnight for optimal attachment of adherent lines, and then placed under low serum-starved conditions for 24 h (DMEM supplemented with 0.5% of FBS). Subsequently, the cells were treated with increasing concentrations of the test compound diluted in DMEM (0.5% FBS) and incubated for 72 h. The control groups received the same amount of vehicle (1% DMSO, final concentration). Growth of tumoral cells was quantified by ability of living cells to reduce the yellow dye MTS to a blue formazan product. Two hours before the end of incubation, 10 µl of MTS were added to each well, and the plate further incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Absorbance was measured in automatic microplate reader Varioskan (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 490 nm. The response to euphol treatment was assessed by standardizing treated groups to the untreated control, and were expressed as a percentage relatively to control cells, in DMSO alone (considered as 100% viability) ± SD.

IC50 determination

The results of absorbance values of treated cells were converted to percentage of cell viability in cells in with presence of the vehicle (DMSO), which were used as control, corresponding to 100% survival. The analysis of the non-linear regression curve using GraphPad PRISM version 7 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) the was carried out on results of viability, yielding an equation used to calculate the concentration of substance required to produce 50% reduction in cell viability (IC50) as previous determined (25,26).

Drug combination studies

Combination studies were done with fixed concentrations (determinated IC50 value) of standard chemotherapeutic paclitaxel (Sigma-T7402; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and gemcitabine hydrochloride (Sigma-G6423; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) (data not shown), exposed simultaneously to increasing concentrations of euphol. The drug interactions were evaluated by the combination index (CI) that was calculated by the Chou-Talalay equation, which takes into account both the potency (Dm or IC50) and the shape of the dose-effect curve (27,28), using CalcuSyn software version 2.0 (Biosoft, Ferguson, MO, USA). In CI analysis, synergy was defined as CI values significantly lower than 1.0; antagonism as CI values significantly higher than 1.0; and additivity as CI values equal to 1.0 at drug IC50 value for each cell line.

Proliferation assay

The proliferation effect of euphol was assessed by BrdU assay kit (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, 5×103 cells/well were seeded in a 96-well, flat-bottom plate. The plate was incubated overnight for optimal attachment of adherent lines, and then placed under low serum-starved conditions for 24 h (DMEM-0.5% FBS). Subsequently, the cells were treated with increasing concentrations of the test compound diluted in DMEM (0.5% FBS) and incubated for 72 h. The control groups received the same amount of vehicle (1% DMSO, final concentration). Therefore, the proliferation effect was assessed by BrdU assay kit following the manufacturer's instructions. Experiments were done in triplicate in three independent experiments for each cell line.

The criterion of GI to ascertain the cell line sensibility to euphol was previously described (29). Mean GI values was calculated at fixed dose of 15 µM of euphol (concentration closer to the mean IC50 value for all cell lines) and established as 100%-percentage of viable cells at this dose. Samples exhibiting more than 60% GI in the presence of 15 µM euphol were classified as highly sensitive (HS); moderately sensitive (MS) when located between 40–60%; and resistant when showing less than 40%. All the assays were done in triplicate and repeated at least three times for each cell line.

Wound-healing migration assay

Cell migration properties were evaluated by wound-healing assay, as previsously described by our group (26,30). The pancreatic cancer cell lines, Mia-Pa-Ca-2 and Panc-1, were plated in 6-well plates and grown to confluence. A sterile tip was used to create a scratch in monolayer cells. Cells were then incubated with euphol at 8.46 and 21.47 µM. The ‘wounded’ areas were photographed by phase contrast microscopy (Model IX71; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) to evaluate wound closure (0, 24, 48 and 72 h). The migration rate of individual cells was determined by measuring the distances covered from the initial time to the selected time-points (bar of distance tool, DP2-BSW Olympus version 2.2). The percentage of the relative migration distance was calculated as wound area at a given time compared to the initial wound surface. Pictures shown are representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicates.

Colony formation-assay

Inhibition of anchorage-independent was assesed by soft-type-agar assay as reported (30). We placed 1 ml of acellular solution of 0.6% agar (combining equal volumes of 1.2% Noble agar with 2× concentrated DMEM with 20% FBS) into a six-well plate and incubated at 37°C for 10 min; 2×104 cells of Mia-Pa-Ca-2 and Panc-1 were homogenized in solution containing DMEM supplemented with 0.35% agar (upper layer agar; equal volumes of 0.7% Noble agar and 2X concentrated DMEM with 20% FBS) and seeded onto acellular coating. After solidification 0.5 ml of DMEM medium + 10% FBS was added. The medium was changed every two days, and DMEM medium + 0.5% euphol at 3 and 10 µM was added. The cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 for 20 days; colonies formed were stained with 0.05% crystal violet for 15 min. Photo-documented colonies were analyzed using the Image J Software. The assay was performed in two biological replicates and the experiments were done in duplicate.

Statistical analysis

The results of in vitro experiments are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments. IC50 values were obtained by nonlinear regression. We applied Student's t-test for comparing two different conditions whereas two-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test was used for assessing differences between more groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All statistical analyzes were performed using GraphPad PRISM version 7 (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

Results

Euphol promotes cytotoxity in human cancer cell lines

The antitumor effect of euphol in vitro was assessed using MTS assay on 73 human cancer lines from 15 solid tumor models (breast, colon, bladder, prostate, lung, pancreas, esophageal, head and neck, cervical, epidermoid carcinoma, meduloblastoma, placental choriocarcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, glioblastoma, and melanoma) (Table I). We generated complete dose-response curves and IC50 values for this euphol treatment. Among each tumor type, the distinct cell lines exhibited a heterogeneous profile of response to euphol (Fig. 2A). The mean of IC50 values was 15.14 (6.47 µg/ml), but varied significantly between individual cell lines with up to a more than 27-fold difference in the IC50 values [IC50 range: 1.41–38.89 µM (0.60–16.62 µg/ml)]. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and pancreatic carcinomas showed the most sensitive profiles (IC50 mean 11.08 and 6.84 µM, respectively, Fig. 2A and Table I), followed by prostate, melanoma and colon cancer cell lines.

Figure 2.

Effect of euphol compound on human cancer cell lines survival. (A) Cellular viability was measured at 72 h by MTS assay. The results were expressed as the mean percentage ± SD of three independent experiments of viable cells relatively to the DMSO alone (considered as 100% viability). The IC50values were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism software. Data represent the mean of at least three independent experiments done in triplicate. (B) Growth inhibition (GI) profile of human cancer-derived cell lines exposed to euphol. Bars represent the cell viability at 15 µM of euphol. Colors represent the GI score classification. Blue (HS, highly sensitive); Yellow (MS, moderate sensitive) and Red (R, resistant).

To allow a better classification of the cell lines response to euphol, we determined their GI. We found that 50.68% (37/77) were classified as HS, 21.92% (16/73) were MS, and 27.4% (20/77) were resistant (Fig. 2B and Table I). Esophageal (100%), prostate (100%) and pancreatic (80%) cancer models showed a higher percentage of HS cell lines. At variance, glioma (54.5%) followed by breast tumor type (42%) has the most cancer cell lines scored as resistant.

Biological effect of euphol on pancreatic cancer cell lines

We further investigated the biological effect of euphol on pancreatic cancer cell lines, the most sensitive tumoral type in our study. To determine whether the effect of euphol on cancer cells is cytotoxic or cytostatic, its effect was also evaluated on the proliferation of pancreatic cell lines by BrdU incorporation. As shown in Fig. 3A, euphol exhibited dose-dependent effects on proliferation of pancreatic cancer cell lines (Panc-1 and Mia-Pa-Ca-2) but varied significantly between individual cell lines. In both cancer cell lines, low doses of euphol slightly decreased proliferation and the dose of 17.51 µM was able to inhibit almost 50% of the proliferation.

Figure 3.

Effect of euphol on pancreatic cancer cell. (A) Cell proliferation was measured with BrdU assay and (B) cell viability was measured with MTS assay on Mia-Pa-Ca-2 and Panc-1 cell lines after 72 h of euphol treatment. The proliferation of the untreated cells and the viability of the untreated cells were regarded as 100%. Results shown are the means ± SD of three independent experiments. Cell motility of (C) Mia-Pa-Ca-2 and (D) Panc-1 was evaluated with wound healing assay. In this assay, a standardized scratch (wound) was applied to cell monolayers and digital images, of the same areas, were taken at several time points (0, 24, 48 and 72 h) after euphol treatment. The distance in pixels was measured in each time point and the percentage of wound closure was calculated according to the distance on initial time point (0 h). Figures are representative of three independent experiments. **Differences with P<0.005 in the Student's t test were considered statistically significant. (E) Effect of euphol on colony formation assay in pancreatic cancer cells. Panc-1 cells were seeded and grown in soft agar medium containing euphol. The number of colonies in each well was determined 20 days after initial euphol treatment. The figures are representative of two experiments performed in duplicate. *Differences with P<0.05 in the Student's t test were considered statistically significant.

Euphol also exhibited dose-dependent effects on cell viability on pancreatic cancer cell lines (Panc-1 and Mia-Pa-Ca-2). Although euphol decreased the proliferation, the strongest inhibition of proliferation was seen at 35.1 µM concentration of euphol after 72 h, with almost 39.4% for Mia-Pa-Ca-2 cells and 51% for Panc-1 cells (Fig. 3A), whereas the same concentration suppressed cell viability of Mia-Pa-Ca-2 cells by 10.7% and Panc-1 cells by 22.4% (Fig. 3B). Thus, comparing the effects on cell viability in concentrations of the same magnitude, euphol seemed to inhibit growth through a more cytotoxic than cytostatic fashion.

Next, we investigated its biological effect on pancreatic cancer cell lines. In untreated conditions for both cell lines (Mia-Pa-Ca-2 and Panc-1, complete close up of the wound took longer than 72 h, suggesting that these cell lines have an intrinsic low migratory capability. Those two cells lines were treated with euphol at 8.46 and 21.47 µM. In spite of the low migratory feature of the cells, euphol treatment significantly inhibited cell migration in Mia-Pa-Ca-2 at 72 h when compared to control cells (Fig. 3C). We could not evaluate the effect of euphol in Panc-1 cell motility, since this cell present an inherent low motility phenotype hampered an adequate assessment of any inhibition. The findings suggest that euphol has a cytotoxic effect but were not able to inhibit the migration of this cell line (Fig. 3D).

In addition to cell proliferation (anchorage-dependent growth) and cell migration, colony formation (anchorage-independent growth) is one of the typical characteristics of the metastatic potential of cancer cells in vitro and strongly correlates with tumorigenesis in vivo (31). Therefore, we evaluated the effect of euphol in anchorage-independent growth of Panc-1 cancer cells. Panc-1 cells formed colonies on agar after 20 days of incubation, and the presence of euphol at IC50 value resulted in a significant suppression of number and size of colonies (P<0.05; Fig. 3E). The ability to form colony was reduced by 90% compared to the untreated control. Similarly, we proceeded the same way with Mia-Pa-Ca-2 cell line, however we can not observe the colonies formation even in the control condition suggesting a low tumorigenic potential of this cell line (data not shown).

Euphol potentiates chemotherapeutic-induced decrease in cell viability

We also evaluated the potential combinatorial value of euphol in the context of standard esophageal and pancreatic tumor therapy. We found that euphol and gemcitabine combination treatment showed a synergistic effect (CI<1) in 50% of pancreatic cells lines investigated (mean CI values, range: 0.76–0.8; Table II), being the combination more effective than single agents. Likewise, euphol was able to synergistically sensitize most esophageal cells lines to paclitaxel treatment (mean CI values, range: 0.37–0.55; Table III).

Table II.

Drug combination studies in pancreatic cancer cell lines.

Cell line	Euphol Mean IC50 (µM)	SD	GEM Mean IC50 (µM)	SD	CI GEM+Euphol[a]
Mia-PaCa-2	8.46	0.39	1.65	0.51	5.16
PANC-1	21.47	1.83	10.37	2.62	1.5
PSN-1	3.71	0.17	0.51	0.02	0.8
BXPC-3	5.47	1.64	0.61	0.05	0.76

CI was analyzed using CalcuSyn Software version 2.0. The CI value significantly lower than 1.0, indicates drug synergism; CI value significantly higher than 1.0, drug antagonism; and CI value equal to 1.0, additive effect. CI, combination index; SD, standard deviation; GEM, Gemcitabine.

Table III.

Drug combination studies in Oesophagus cancer cell lines.

Cell line	Euphol Mean IC50 (µM)	SD	Paclitaxel Mean IC50 (µM)	SD	CI PC+Euphol[a]
KYSE30	3.52	1.28	0.015	0.003	0.54
KYSE70	8.77	0.74	0.009	0.001	0.37
KYSE270	10.71	3.95	0.018	0.002	0.55
KYSE410	4.35	2.03	0.023	0.008	2.02

CI was analyzed using CalcuSyn Software version 2.0. The CI value significantly lower than 1.0, indicates drug synergism; CI value significantly higher than 1.0, drug antagonism; and CI value equal to 1.0, additive effect. PC, paclitaxel; CI, combination index; SD, standard deiviation.

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated the cytotoxity effects of euphol on a large panel of 73 human cancer cell lines, derived from 15 solid tumor models including breast, colon, bladder, prostate, lung, pancreas, esophagus, head and neck, cervical cancer as well as glioma and melanoma. We observed that euphol exhibited dose-dependent cytotoxic effects on all human cancer cell lines tested with the highest effect (reduced viability) for pancreas and esophageal cancer lines, followed by prostate, melanoma and colon cancer cell lines. According to the American National Cancer Institute criteria, euphol would be a promising compound for further analysis since its IC50 values were lower than 30 µg/ml (http://www.cancer.gov) (32). The cytotoxic and/or growth-inhibition effects of euphol were identified at low IC50 values, being lower than 30 µg/ml for 71 out 73 cancer cell lines tested. Our results are in agreement with earlier in vitro reports that suggested E. tirucalli crude extracts or euphol may have antitumoral effect. The relative toxicity of the E. tirucalli crude extracts on Mia-Pa-Ca-2 was also evaluated by Munro et al, which demonstrated that methanol extracts exerted a significant decrease in cell viability at 25 µg/ml (33). Also, Choene et al, investigated E. tirucali crude extracts that contains different types of secondary metabolites mainly terpenes and flavonoids, and reported its effect on breast cancer (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231) cell cycle arrest (34). Lin et al, reported the effect of euphol in gastric cancer cell lines (CSN, CS12, AGS and MKN45) with an IC50 values of 49.6, 12.8, 14.7 and 14.4 (µg/ml), respectively (17). The authors also reported that euphol induced apoptosis by upregulation of ERK signaling (17). Another study analyzing the T47D breast cancer cells showed that euphol has an antiproliferative activity, with IC50 values of 260 µM (16). The results suggest a cytostatic effect for euphol that induced GI by cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase. In our study we observed a lower IC50 value (38.89 µM) in the T47D cells, yet, also above the limite considered effective by NCI. It is worthy of note that although the extract of E. tirucalli containing 64% euphol (7), in our study breast cancer cell lines were the less responsive to euphol in which the HPLC purity revealed above 95%. This finding seems to be in accordance with the potential of the compound found in phytochemical evaluation, which indicated that it is a tetracyclic triterpene alcohol (7,35).

To gain more insight into the role played by euphol in tumorigenesis, we investigated the biological effect of euphol on pancreatic cancer cell lines. Euphol inhibited cell proliferation (anchorage-dependent growth) as well as colony formation (anchorage-independent growth) of pancreatic cancer cells. We also showed that euphol inhibits cell migration of Mia-Pa-Ca-2 cancer cell line. One of the suitable molecular cancer targets is protein kinase (ERK), which is an important factor in the regulation of cell migration of numerous cell types. The ERK pathway inhibitors PD98059 and U0126 inhibit the migration of diverse cell types in response to cell matrix proteins, such as fibronectin, vitronectin and collagen (36). Supporting a possible role of ERK inhibition on migration modulation by euphol, Passos et al, showed that, at the intracellular level, euphol reduced TPA-induced extracellular signal-regulated ERK activation in skin inflammation in mice (13). However, these data are in disagreement with Lin et al, which showed that euphol selectively induced gastric cancer cells apoptosis by activation of ERK signaling (17). Taken together, these findings provided further support that euphol effect may depend on the cellular context and showed that further investigation regarding euphol in other cancer cell lines and in other experimental model are required.

In addition, we investigated the combination of euphol to chemotherapy in pancreas and esophageal cancer lines and we found that euphol when combined with a gemcitabine and paclitaxel treatment seems to have a synergistic effect (chemo-sensitization) leading to lower doses of therapeutic agents. This synergy (chemo-sensitization) is of major interest since those two standard chemotherapy drugs formed the therapy backbone for those cancers, the level of responses seen in practice is still suboptimal and there is an urgent need for improvement (37,38).

The present study constitutes, to our knowledge, the first largest screening of euphol efficacy on human cancer cell lines. We showed that euphol could be a promising agent on large number of tumor types, in particularly in esophageal and pancreatic cancer. One important limitation of the present study is the lack of normal counterpart cells of the distinct tumor types evaluated. Therefore, additional studies are warranted to address this topic. This study also revealed the inhitbition/reduction of some hallmark events, such as proliferation and migration as part of the mechanism of action of this compound on pancreatic cancer cells. Finally, the euphol also showed synergistic interactions with chemotherapeutic drugs used in clinical practice. Our results provide insights for further studies suggesting euphol as an interesting antineoplastic alone or in combination for cancer treatment.