| Literature DB >> 30111353 |
Maria Köping1, Wafaa Shehata-Dieler2, Dieter Schneider2, Mario Cebulla2, Daniel Oder3, Jonas Müntze3, Peter Nordbeck3, Christoph Wanner3, Rudolf Hagen2, Sebastian P Schraven4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fabry Disease (FD) is an X-linked hereditary lysosomal storage disorder which leads to a multisystemic intralysosomal accumulation of globotriaosylceramid (Gb3). Besides prominent renal and cardiac organ involvement, patients commonly complain about vestibulocochlear symptoms like high-frequency hearing loss, tinnitus and vertigo. However, comprehensive data especially on vertigo remain scarce. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and characteristics of vertigo and hearing loss in patients with FD, depending on renal and cardiac parameters and get hints about the site and the pattern of the lesions.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiomyopathy; Chronic kidney disease; Fabry disease; Lysosomal storage disorder; VEMP; Vertigo
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30111353 PMCID: PMC6094894 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-018-0882-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Characteristics in history of vertigo (n = 57)
| Male | Female | Total (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients ( | 27 | 30 | 57 (100) |
| Vertigo | |||
| Yes | 16 | 15 | 31 (54.4) |
| No | 11 | 15 | 26 (45.6) |
| Duration | |||
| Intermittent | 8 | 9 | 17 (29.8) |
| Permanent | 1 | 1 | 2 (3.5) |
| Triggered | 7 | 5 | 12 (21.1) |
| Character | |||
| Rotary | 4 | 5 | 9 (15.8) |
| Staggering | 6 | 5 | 11 (19.3) |
| Nondirectional | 6 | 5 | 11 (19.3) |
Fig. 1VNG (a) 10 out of 57 patients (17.5%) showed a SPN in VNG. (b) VNG was pathological in 41 cases: 17 times CP > 25%, 23 times vestibular inhibition and 18 times inhibitory deficit. (n = 57). (c) CP compared with age groups (19–40,41–60 and 61–80 years), with GFR (divided into groups: ≥90,60-89,30–59 and ≤ 29 ml/min/1.73m2) and with degree of heart failure (divided into NYHA classes: 0,1,2,3). (n = 17)
Latencies and amplitudes with increasing age
| Age (years) | cVEMP | oVEMP | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latency P1 (ms) | Latency N1 (ms) | Amplitude (μV) | Latency P1 (ms) | Latency N1 (ms) | Amplitude (μV) | |
| 19–40 | 11.73 | 21.73 | 58.8 | 16.44 | 11.51 | 2.04 |
| SD | 1.66 | 2.49 | 35.51 | 3.64 | 2.62 | 1.33 |
| 41–60 | 12.02 | 21.21 | 42.36 | 17.72 | 12.63 | 1.62 |
| SD | 2.89 | 3.54 | 22.94 | 3.52 | 2.89 | 1.23 |
| 61–80 | 12.61 | 20.3 | 23.77 | 18.39 | 13.57 | 1.38 |
| SD | 2.44 | 2.87 | 9.79 | 3.76 | 3.84 | 0.86 |
Fig. 2cVEMP latencies and amplitudes vs. GFR and NYHA. (a) A decrease in GFR (≥90,60-89,30–59 and ≤ 29 ml/min/1.73m2) and (b) an increase in NYHA class (0, 1, 2 and 3) tendentially show a prolongation of p1 latencies. (c) A decrease in GFR and (d) an increase in NYHA are only partially correlated significantly with a decrease in cVEMP amplitude. Asterisks mark significant values with p < 0.05. (n = 95)
Fig. 3VEMPs vs. 6-PTA. The 6-PTA correlates significantly with the cVEMP amplitude (a). The correlation of the 6-PTA with cVEMP-p1 latency (b), oVEMP amplitude (c) and oVEMP-n1 latency (d) is not significant