| Literature DB >> 30111334 |
Mercè Pineda1,2, Mark Walterfang3, Marc C Patterson4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Niemann-Pick disease type C (NP-C) is a rare, autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative disease associated with a wide variety of progressive neurological manifestations. Miglustat is indicated for the treatment of progressive neurological manifestations in both adults and children. Since approval in 2009 there has been a vast growth in clinical experience with miglustat. The effectiveness of miglustat has been assessed using a range of measures.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Efficacy; Miglustat; Niemann-Pick disease type C
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30111334 PMCID: PMC6094874 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-018-0844-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Summary of studies/case series in paediatric patients
| Study / ref | Design | Pts / controls (N) | Mean (range) pt agea | Biomarkers and surrogate biomarkers | Median (range) treatment duration | Reported treatment effects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patterson et al. (2010) [ | 12-mo prospective multicentre Phase II RCT, 12-mo extension and continued extension | LI, JUV pts. | 7 (4–11) yrs | • HSEM-α and HSEM-β | 2.9 (2–4) yrs | • Stabilised HSEM, swallowing, SAI |
| Pineda et al. (2010) [ | Paediatric multicentre case series with up to 52-mo follow up | EI, LI, JUV pts. | NR (1–15) yrs | • Disability scale | NR (0.5–4) yrs | • Stabilised disability scores |
| Héron et al. (2012) [ | Paediatric prospective open-label multicentre observational study | EI, LI, JUV pts. | 3 (< 1–7) yrs | • Disability scale | EI: 1.3 (NR) yrs | • Neurological improvement/stabilisation more frequent in LI and JUV vs. EI pts |
| Fecarotta et al. (2011) [ | Prospective open-label single-centre observational study | EI and JUV pts. | NR (< 1–11) yrs | • VFS | NR (3.0–4.0) yrs | • Improved swallowing function |
| Karimzadeh et al. (2013) [ | Paediatric multicentre case series with up to 26-mo follow up | EI, LI, JUV pts. | NR (< 1–11) yrs | • Disability scale | EI: 0.8 (NR) yrs | • Ambulation, fine/gross motor movements, swallowing, speech and VSSP generally stabilised |
aAge at disease onset or diagnosis; ChT chitotriosidase, DDST Denver developmental screening test, EI early-infantile, HSEM horizontal eye movements, JUV juvenile, LI late infantile, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, MRS magnetic resonance spectroscopy, NR not reported, PET positron emission tomography, pt./pts. patient(s), RCT randomised controlled trial, SAI standard ambulation index, VFS video-fluoroscopic analysis, WISCR Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children
Summary of adult and across-ages cohorts
| Study / ref | Design | Pts / controls (N) | Mean (range) pt agea | Biomarkers and surrogate biomarkers | Median (range) treatment duration | Reported treatment effects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patterson et al. (2007) [ | 12-mo prospective multicentre Phase II RCT | JUV and A/A pts. | Miglustat pts. 25 (12–42) yrs. | • HSEM-α/HSEM-β |
| • Stabilised SEM, swallowing, SAI |
| Pineda et al. (2009) [ | Retrospective multicentre observational study | EI, LI, JUV, A/A pts. | 10 (0–32) yrs | • NP-C disability scale | 1.5 (0.1–4.5) yrs | • Stabilised disability scores |
| Wraith et al. (2009) [ | Post hoc analysis from Phase II RCT | LI, JUV, A/A pts. | A/A: | • Disease stability | 1.0 (NR) yr | • Stabilisation in 21/29 (72%) pts. overall |
| Galanaud et al. (2009) [ | Single-centre case series with 24-mo follow up | A/A pts. | 17 (16–19) yrs | • MRI | 2.0 (NR) yrs | • Clinical improvement or stabilization |
| Wraith et al. (2010) [ | 12-mo open-label extension and continued extension of Phase II RCT | A/A pts. | 25 (12–42) yrs | • HSEM-α | 1.9 (0.1–2.0) yrs | • Stabilised HSEM-α, ambulation and swallowing |
| Walterfang et al. (2012) [ | Systematic literature review and longitudinal meta-analysis | EI, LI, JUV and A/A pts. | NR | • Survival | NR | • Potential survival benefit |
| Fecarotta et al. (2015) [ | Prospective open-label multicentre observational study | EI, LI, JUV, A/A pts. | 13 (< 1–44) yrs | • Disability scale | 5.9 (4.0–8.0) yrs | • Stabilised/improved neurological manifestations |
| Bowman et al. (2015) [ | Prospective open-label single-centre observational study | A/A pts. vs. healthy controls | 28 (14–47) yrs | • MRI | 2.8 (NR) yrs | • Protective effect on cerebellar Purkinje neurones |
| Patterson et al. (2015) [ | Registry-based multicentre observational study | EI, LI, JUV, A/A pts. | 10 (< 1–45) yrs | • Disability scale | 3.9b (1.1–9.8) yrs | • Reduced disease progression |
| Sedel et al. (2016) [ | Prospective open-label multicentre observational study | JUV and A/A pts. | 17 (9–32) yrs | • Disability scale | 1.6 (0.5–8) yrs | • Improved Cho/NAA ratio |
| Lau et al. (2016) [ | Prospective, open-label single-centre observational study | EI, LI, JUV, A/A pts. | 11 (1–22) yrs | • NNSS | NR | • Lower NNSS severity scores across a range of cerebellar DTI measures |
| Bradbury et al. (2016) [ | Prospective open-label single-centre observational study | EI, LI, JUV, A/A pts. | 11 (2–51) yrs | • CSF calbindin | NR (0.5–1.25) yrs | • Reduced CSF calbindin vs. controls |
| Masingue et al. (2017) [ | Retrospective open-label single-centre observational study | A/A pts. vs. healthy controls | MRI: 18 (5–56) yrs | • Disability scale | 5.0b (1.0–9.0) yrs | • Improved FA in some brain regions |
| Heitz et al. (2017) [ | Retrospective open-label single-centre observational study | A/A pts. | 35 (NR) yrs | • Cog. function (MMSE/FAB) | 1.5 (NR) yrs | • Stable neuropsychological scores |
aAge at disease onset or diagnosis; bmean duration; A/A adolescent/adult onset, BARS Brief ataxia rating scale, Cho choline, ChT chitotriosidase, Cr creatine, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, DTI diffusion tension imaging, EI early-infantile, FA fractional anisotropy, FAB frontal assessment battery, HSEM horizontal saccadic eye movements, HSG horizontal saccadic gain, JUV juvenile, LI late infantile, MMSE mini-mental state examination, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, MRS magnetic resonance spectroscopy, NAA N-acetyl aspartate, NNSS NIH neurological severity scale, NR not reported, pt./pts. patient(s), RCT randomised controlled trial, SAI standard ambulation index
Summary of key case reports
| Study / ref | Design | Pts / controls (N) | Mean (range) pt agea | Biomarkers and surrogate biomarkers | Median (range) treatment durationb | Reported treatment effects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chien et al. (2007) [ | Case report on 2 pts. with 1-yr follow up | EI, JUV pts. | – | • VFS | 1 yr | • Improved/stabilised swallowing and ambulation |
| Santos et al. (2008) [ | Single-pt. case report with 12-mo follow up | JUV pt. | – | • Disability scale | 1 yr | • Stable disability scores |
| Scheel et al. (2010) [ | Single-pt. case report with 12-mo follow up | A/A pt. vs. age-matched controls | 29 yrs | • DTI | 1 yr | • Improved FA in the corpus callosum |
| Di Rocco et al. (2012) [ | Case report on 2 pts. with up to 7 yrs’ follow up | EI pts. | Pt 1: 7 mo | • Neurological examination | Pt 1: 5 yrs | • Neurological stabilisation |
| Chien et al. (2013) [ | Single-centre case series with up to 6-yr follow up | EI, JUV pts. | NR (4–8) yrs | • VFS | 4 (4–6) yrs | • Swallowing function stabilised |
| Mattsson et al. (2013) [ | Single-pt. case report | A/A pt. | 44 yrs | • Neurological examination | NR | • Improved speech (from mutism to complete, coherent sentences) |
| Szakszon et al. (2014) [ | Single-pt. case report with 3-yr follow up | JUV pt. | 10 yrs | • Neurological examination | 3 yrs | • Complete recovery from psychosis |
| Maubert et al. (2015) [ | Case report in sibling pair | A/A pt. | Pt. 1: 22 yrs | • Neurological examination | Pt 1: 1.7 yr | • Stable psych. Symptoms and cog. Function |
| Cuisset et al. (2016) [ | Single-pt. case report in atypical NP-C | JUV pt. | 10 yrs | • Swallowing (VFS) | 3 yrs | • Global improvement |
| Abe and Sakai (2017) [ | Single-pt. case report with 20-yr follow up | JUV pt. | 20 yrs | • Neurological examination | 4 yrs | • Improved swallowing capacity |
| Benussi et al. (2017) [ | Prospective, single-centre case-control study | A/A pts. vs. healthy controls | 35 (25–57) yrs | • TMS | 1.0 (NA) yr | • Improved LTP-like cortical plasticity |
| Hassan et al. (2017) [ | Single-pt. case report in a pt. with cerebellar ataxia | A/A pt. | – | • TMS | 1.3 yrs | • Reduced short-latency afferent inhibition (sensorimotor integration) |
aAge at disease onset or diagnosis; bsingle-patient follow up for case reports; A/A adolescent/adult-onset, CBCL Child behaviour checklist, ChT chitotriosidase, DTI diffusion tension imaging, EEG electroencephalography, EI early-infantile, FA fractional anisotropy, HSEM horizontal saccadic eye movements, JUV juvenile, LI late infantile, MMSE mini-mental state examination, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, NR not reported, SAI, standard ambulation index, TMS transcranial magnetic stimulation, VFS video-fluoroscopic analysis
Fig. 1From biochemical and cellular/neuronal effects to clinical efficacy and improved outcomes
Overview of NP-C disease markers
| Type | Description and experience | Subjective/objective | Drawbacks | Diagnosis | Disease/treatment monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General clinical impairment | |||||
| NP-C disability scales | • Categorical measures | Subjective | • Variability of scales | – | X |
| Developmental delay / cognitive impairment | • Subjective scales (MMSE, DDST) | Subjective/objective | • Limited disease specificity | – | X |
| SAI | • General, practical scale | Subjective | • Limited disease specificity | – | X |
| Ocular motor assessments (VOG) | |||||
| Saccadic eye movements | • Well-characterised measure | Objective | – | X | X |
| Swallowing assessments | |||||
| Clinical observation | • Multiple, varied assessments | Subjective | • Time-consuming | – | X |
| VFS | • Direct measures standardised based on dysphagia scales | Objective | • Not widely available | – | X |
| Neuroimaging | |||||
| MRI (volumetry) | • Extensive published information | Objective | • Non-specificity | – | X |
| DTI (FA parameters) | • Sensitive measures | Objective | • Non-specificity | – | X |
| MRS (Cho/NAA ratio) | • Sensitive measures | Objective | • Non-specificity | – | X |
| PET (hypo/hyper-metabolism) | • Dynamic, functional measures | Objective | • Non-specificity | – | X |
| Neurotransmission | |||||
| TMS (cortical plasticity) | • Functional measure of neurological function | Objective | • Non-specificity | – | X |
| Biomarkers | |||||
| Filipin staining | • Previous ‘gold standard’ marker based on patient skin biopsies | Objective | • Labour-intensive: difficult to perform and interpret | X | – |
| Plasma ChT | • Widely available LSD marker | Objective | • Non-specificity | – | X |
| CSF Cho/NAA ratio | • Used in a cohort study/case series | Objective | • Limited published experience | – | X |
| CSF calbindin | • Highly specific marker | Objective | • Invasive sampling procedure (spinal tap) | – | X |
| Plasma oxysterols (c-triol, 7-keto) | • Rapid, cost-effective markers | Objective | • Lack of published data from disease monitoring | X | – |
| Plasma bile acids | • Rapid, cost-effective markers | Objective | • Lack of published data from disease monitoring | X | – |
| Lysosphingolipids (e.g., Lyso-SM-509) | • Rapid, cost-effective markers | Objective | • Lack of published data from disease monitoring | X | – |
Bayley-III Bayley scales of infant development [50], ChT chitotriosidase, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, DBS dried blood spots, DDST Denver developmental screening test [49], DTI diffusion tensor imaging, EI early-infantile, FA fractional anisotropy, HSEM horizontal eye movements, MMSE mini-mental status evaluation [60], MRI magnetic resonance imaging, MRS magnetic resonance spectroscopy, PET positron emission tomography, SAI standard ambulation index, TMS transcranial magnetic stimulation, VFS videofluoroscopic studies, VOG video-oculography, WAISR Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test, WISCR Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children [112]
Recommendations on NP-C marker selection for following disease development or treatment efficacy
| • NP-C disability scale based clinical measures are easy to use and broadly acknowledged. | |
| • Simple, focussed NP-C disability scales (e.g. Pineda scale [ | |
| • The efficient application of an NP-C marker as part of a research study does not guarantee that the marker will be useful in individual patients in a hospital setting. | |
| • Imaging and laboratory marker methods should ideally be applied using established, locally available methods and expertise. | |
| • Specific imaging markers (e.g., MRI, DTI, VFS) provide objective, quantitative data, and can be applied independently of patient age. | |
| • The application of laboratory markers should be considered in relation to patients’ or carers’ acceptance and access. | |
| • Diagnostic NP-C biomarkers (oxysterols, lysosphingolipids, bile acids) do not currently qualify as effective methods for disease monitoring over time. |