| Literature DB >> 29047377 |
Camille Heitz1, Stéphane Epelbaum2, Yann Nadjar2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is one of the core symptoms of Niemann Pick type C (NPC) disease, but few data concerning the neuropsychological profile of NPC patients are available. The aim of our study was to characterize cognitive impairments in NPC disease and to assess the evolution of these symptoms and the impact of miglustat on cognitive follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: Cognitive impairments; Lipidose; Neuropsychological assessment; Niemann pick type C disease
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29047377 PMCID: PMC5648435 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-017-0714-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Fig. 1Study flowchart. This diagram represents the study design with the inclusion of patients and the three assessments
Population characteristics at the first examination
| Mean | SD | Median | IQR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 34.9 | 12.6 | 30 | 24.5–40.5 |
| Gender (M/F) | 8/13 | |||
| Education (years) | 9 | 3.2 | 11 | 5–12 |
| Age of onset (years) | 21.6 | 15.4 | 16 | 13.3–25 |
| Disease duration (years) | 14.4 | 13.2 | 9 | 4–19 |
| Walking score (/5) | 1.4 | 0.8 | 1 | 1–2 |
| Manipulation score (/4) | 1.6 | 0.6 | 2 | 1–2 |
| Dysarthria score (/5) | 1.8 | 0.7 | 2 | 2–2 |
| Deglutition score (/4) | 1.5 | 1.1 | 2 | 0–2 |
| History of psychosis Y/N | 7/14 | |||
| Learning disorder Y/N | 3/18 | |||
| Time between the onset of disease and the initiation of miglustat (years) | 7.7 | 5 | 7 | 3.7–17.7 |
| Duration of miglustat (months)a | 18.8 | 15.5 | 18 | 3–32.3 |
A total of 21 patients were included in the study. Disease duration is the time between the onset of the disease and the first neuropsychological examination. Walking, manipulation, dysarthria and deglutition scores are determined at diagnosis. All patients were treated by miglustat but three patients stopped the treatment after 5, 6 and 13 months of treatment respectively
aDuration of therapy prior to first neuropsychological assessment
IQR interquartile range, M/F male/female, SD standard deviation, W women, Y/N yes/no.
Fig. 2Impairments of the main cognitive functions. The figure represents the percentage of patients with impairment (red) or preservation (green) of each cognitive function for the first neuropsychological examination (N = 21 patients)
Neuropsychological evaluation in NPC patients
| Functions | Tests | n | Mean | SD | Median | IQR | Normsa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global cognitive efficiency | Impaired (Y/N) | 17/4 | |||||
| MMSE (/30) | 20 | 20.6 | 6.8 | 22 | 17.2–25 | ≥ 27 | |
| Mattis (/140) | 12 | 103.6 | 28.6 | 117 | 110–125 | ≥ 123 | |
| Executive functions | Impaired (Y/N) | 17/3 | |||||
| FAB (/18) | 19 | 11.6 | 4.1 | 12 | 11–14 | ≥ 16 | |
| Wisc. (criteria) (/6) | 9 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 3 | 2–6 | ≥ 5.6 | |
| Lexical fluency | 12 | 6.5 | 4.4 | 5.5 | 3–9.7 | ≥ 17–19 | |
| Semantic fluency | 11 | 13.3 | 5.8 | 11 | 10–15 | ≥ 26–29 | |
| Attention | Impaired (Y/N) | 11/1 | |||||
| Direct verbal spans | 11 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 5 | 4–6 | 7 ± 2 | |
| Indirect verbal spans | 11 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 3 | 2–3 | 5 ± 2 | |
| Direct visual spans | 9 | 4.1 | 1.5 | 4 | 3–5 | 7 ± 2 | |
| Indirect visual spans | 9 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 3 | 2–4.5 | 5 ± 2 | |
| Memory (FCSRT) | Impaired (Y/N) | 6/7 | |||||
| Immediate Recall (/16) | 8 | 13.6 | 1.5 | 14 | 12.5–14 | ≥ 14 | |
| Free recall (/48) | 8 | 22.5 | 5.7 | 22.5 | 17.5–28.2 | ≥ 17 | |
| Total recall (/48) | 9 | 43.4 | 5.6 | 45 | 40.5–47 | ≥ 40 | |
| Cued free recall (/16) | 8 | 8 | 3.6 | 8.5 | 6.2–10.7 | ≥ 10 | |
| Cued total recall (/16) | 8 | 14.5 | 2.5 | 15.5 | 13.5–16 | ≥ 15 | |
| Language | Impaired (Y/N) | 8/3 | |||||
| BNT 34 (/34) | 4 | 21.3 | 8.7 | 19.5 | 14–30.2 | ≥ 27 | |
| Praxis | Impaired (Y/N) | 10/3 | |||||
| Visuo-contructive functions | Impaired (Y/N) | 5/5 | |||||
| Rey figure (score) | 6 | 28.3 | 8.1 | 31.5 | 25.5–32.2 | ≥ 29 | |
| Rey figure (second) | 6 | 319.2 | 149.9 | 341 | 179.5–459.7 | ≤ 360 |
This table presents results of the first neuropsychological examination. This test took place an average of 14.4 years after the onset of the disease and 16.6 months after the diagnosis
BNT Boston naming test, FAB frontal assessment battery, FCSRT free and cued selective reminding test, IQR interquartile range, MMSE mini-mental state examination, N number of available tests, SD standard deviation, Y/: yes/no.
aThese are approximated norms for patients between 30 and 40 years old to give an approximate cut-off of expected results
Fig. 3Mean and interquartile ranges of neuropsychological test scores. This figure presents patients’ scores, averages and interquartile ranges of tests on the first neuropsychological examination. BNT = Boston naming test; FAB = frontal assessment battery; FCSRT = free and cued selective reminding test; MMSE = mini-mental state examination
Correlation between MMSE, FAB and clinical data
| MMSE | FAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Age of onset | R2 = −0.04 ( | R2 = −0.3 ( |
| Age at first examination |
| R2 = 0.27 ( |
| Disease duration |
| R2 = −0.07 ( |
| Education level | R2 = 0.10 ( | R2 = 0.14 ( |
| Presence of psychosis | R2 = 0.27 ( | R2 = 0.20 ( |
| Walking score | R2 = 0.2 ( | R2 = 0.19 ( |
| Manipulation score |
| R2 = 0.12 ( |
| Dysarthria score |
|
|
| Deglutition score | R2 = 0.2 ( | R2 = 0.13 ( |
| Duration of miglustat | R2 = −0.46 ( | R2 = −0.17 ( |
| Time between the onset of disease and the initiation of miglustat | R2 = −0.28 ( | R2 = 0.1 ( |
A probability value of <0.05 was considered significant
Significant results are written in bold
FAB frontal assessment battery, MMSE mini-mental state examination
Fig. 4Evolution of FAB and MMSE with treatment by miglustat. This figure presents the MMSE and FAB scores over time with treatment by miglustat. The initiation of miglustat is indicated by an arrow. Each point represents a neuropsychological examination. Patient 8 had learning disabilities. Dotted lines denote patients who were treated by miglustat before their first neuropsychological evaluation. FAB = frontal assessment battery; MMSE = mini-mental state examination
Evolution of neuropsychological tests between the first and last evaluation
| Functions | Tests | N | First test mean (SD) | Last test mean (SD) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global cognitive efficiency | MMSE (/30) | 10 | 24.4 (3.4) | 23.5 (3.1) | 0.168 |
| Mattis (/140) | 6 | 119 (5.7) | 113.5 (10.3) | 0.115 | |
| Executive functions | FAB (/18) | 8 | 13.5 (2.2) | 11.9 (3.1) | 0.140 |
| Wisconsin (errors) | 4 | 4 (5) | 5.5 (6.9) | 0.465 | |
| Wisconsin (criteria) | 4 | 3.4 (2.4) | 3.8 (2.7) | 0.655 | |
| Lexical fluency | 6 | 7.7 (3.1) | 5.3 (1.9) | 0.104 | |
| Semantic fluency | 6 | 12.7 (4.4) | 11 (3.7) | 0.673 | |
| Attention | Direct verbal span | 5 | 5 (0.7) | 4.4 (0.5) | 0.180 |
| Indirect verbal span | 4 | 3 (0.8) | 3.5 (0.6) | 0.157 | |
| Direct visual span | 3 | 4.7 (0.6) | 4.7 (0.6) | 1 | |
| Indirect visual span | 3 | 4 (1) | 4.3 (0.6) | 0.317 | |
| Memory (FCSRT) | Immediate Recall (/16) | 6 | 14 (1.3) | 14.2 (1.2) | 0.564 |
| Free recall (/48) | 6 | 20.2 (4.4) | 17.8 (6.7) | 0.136 | |
| Total recall (/48) | 6 | 44.8 (4.4) | 43.2 (4.4) | 0.102 | |
| Delayed free recall (/16) | 6 | 7 (3.5) | 7.8 (4.1) | 0.595 | |
| Delayed total recall (/16) | 6 | 14.3 (2.9) | 14.3 (4.1) | 1 |
The mean duration between two tests was 56.4 months (SD = 41.3). One patient had learning disabilities. Five patients were treated by miglustat at the first evaluation and all patients were treated by miglustat at the last evaluation
FAB frontal assessment battery, FCSRT free and cued selective reminding test, MMSE mini-mental state examination, N number of available tests, SD standard deviation