Literature DB >> 30110019

Adverse Effects of the Medicare PSI-90 Hospital Penalty System on Revenue-Neutral Hospital-Acquired Conditions.

William V Padula, Joyce M Black1, Patricia M Davidson2, So Yeon Kang3, Peter J Pronovost.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Health systems are grappling with improving the quality and safety of health care. By setting clear expectations, there is an opportunity to configure care models to decrease the risk of adverse events and promote the quality of care. The US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have used Patient Safety Indicator 90 (PSI90), a composite rate of hospital-acquired conditions (HACs), to adjust payments and score hospitals on quality since 2015. However, PSI90 may be associated with adverse prioritization for preventing some conditions over others.Our objective was to evaluate the time-dependent rates of HACs between 2013 and 2016 to assess the association of funding models on adverse events, particularly pressure injury.
METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective observational cohort of patients hospitalized in US Academic Medical Centers observed by the Vizient CDB/RM pre-post PSI90 implementation. Changes in HAC component rates of PSI90 between 2013 and 2016 were measured longitudinally using mixed-effects negative binomial regression modeling.
RESULTS: Regardless of whether the composite measure of patient outcomes was PSI90 or all HACs, in general, there was significant decrease after PSI90 was implemented, reflecting an association between PSI90 and CMS reimbursement policy. However, pressure injury rates increased by 29.4% (SE = 0.08; P < 0.05) during this time frame, the only HAC observed to increase related to PSI90.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient safety in hospitals will only thoroughly improve when hospitals are fully incentivized to practice prevention of all HACs rather than work around the harms that result from failed prevention efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30110019     DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Saf        ISSN: 1549-8417            Impact factor:   2.844


  9 in total

1.  The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States.

Authors:  William V Padula; Benjo A Delarmente
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Complexity Bias in the Prevention of Iatrogenic Injury: Why Specific Harms May Inhibit Performance.

Authors:  William V Padula; David G Armstrong; Dana P Goldman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Burden of Pressure Injuries: Findings From the Global Burden of Disease Study.

Authors:  Charalampos Siotos; Andrew M Bonett; George Damoulakis; Adan Z Becerra; George Kokosis; Keith Hood; Amir H Dorafshar; Deana S Shenaq
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-06-13

4.  Pressure injury prevalence and risk factors in Chinese adult intensive care units: A multi-centre prospective point prevalence study.

Authors:  Frances Fengzhi Lin; Yu Liu; Zijing Wu; Jing Li; Yanming Ding; Chunyan Li; Zhixia Jiang; Jing Yang; Kefang Wang; Jie Gao; Xiaohan Li; Xinhua Xia; Hongmei Liu; Xinxia Li; Xiaoyan Chen; Lei Yang; Xiuhua Fang; Ronghua Zhao; Jingfang Chen; Sonia Labeau; Stijn Blot
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Five-layer border dressings as part of a quality improvement bundle to prevent pressure injuries in US skilled nursing facilities and Australian nursing homes: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  William V Padula; Yutong H Chen; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) cost hospitals millions.

Authors:  Olga A Vsevolozhskaya; Karina C Manz; Pierre M Zephyr; Teresa M Waters
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Pressure Injury Prevention for Complex Cardiovascular Patients in the Operating Room and Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project.

Authors:  Joyce Pittman; Dawn Horvath; Terrie Beeson; Karrie Bailey; Annie Mills; Laura Kaiser; Deborah K Hall; Jennifer Sweeney
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 1.970

8.  Pressure Injuries in Critical Care Patients in US Hospitals: Results of the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey.

Authors:  Jill Cox; Laura E Edsberg; Kimberly Koloms; Catherine A VanGilder
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 1.970

9.  Attitudes of nursing staff towards pressure ulcer prevention in primary and specialised health care: A correlational cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Heidi Parisod; Arja Holopainen; Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa; Pauli Puukka; Dimitri Beeckman; Elina Haavisto
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.315

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.