| Literature DB >> 30109054 |
Ying Guo1, Xiuqing Han1, Hongxia Che1, Zhaojie Li1, Ping Dong1, Changhu Xue1,2, Tiantian Zhang1,2, Yuming Wang1,2.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming an increasingly prevalent chronic liver disease all over the world. The present study was undertaken to explore the synergistic effects of sea cucumber saponins (SCS) and eicosapentaenoic acid-enriched phospholipids (EPA-PL) at ratios of 0.5 : 0.5 and 1 : 1 on NAFLD and demonstrate possible protective mechanisms. It was found that the combination of EPA-PL and SCS at half dose exhibited better effects than EPA-PL or SCS alone and the combination of EPA-PL and SCS at full dose in alleviating orotic acid (OA)-induced symptoms including growth parameters, serum parameters and liver function. Further evaluation of the mechanism illustrated that EPA-PL and SCS combination at the ratio of 0.5 : 0.5 could markedly reduce the mRNA expressions of fatty acid synthase, acetyl-CoA carboxylase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and malic enzyme genes and significantly increase expression of genes relevant to fatty acid β-oxidation including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor and its target genes (CPT1, CPT2 and ACOX1), suggesting that the protection of the EPA-PL and SCS combination at the ratio of 0.5 : 0.5 against OA-induced NAFLD might be mainly via lipogenesis inhibition and β-oxidation enhancement in the liver. The synergistic effects of EPA-PL and SCS make it possible to reduce the doses of EPA-PL or SCS to avoid side effects, which is of value for the development of dietary supplements or functional foods for preventing or treating NAFLD.Entities:
Keywords: EPA-enriched phospholipids; lipid metabolism; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; sea cucumber saponin; synergistic effect
Year: 2018 PMID: 30109054 PMCID: PMC6083717 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.172182
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Main fatty acid compositions of EPA-PL (%).
| fatty acid | EPA-PL |
|---|---|
| C16:0 | 5.23 ± 0.43 |
| C16:1 | 1.59 ± 0.13 |
| C17:0 | 0.92 ± 0.06 |
| C18:2 | 2.60 ± 0.23 |
| C18:3 | 1.74 ± 0.16 |
| C20:0 | 1.77 ± 0.14 |
| C20:3 | 14.9 ± 1.14 |
| C20:5 | 59.7 ± 3.83 |
| C22:6 | 1.51 ± 0.11 |
Composition of experimental diets. ‘—’, none added.
| ingredient composition (g kg−1) | Con | OA | EPA-PL | SCS | EPA-PL : SCS 0.5 : 0.5 | EPA-PL : SCS 1 : 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sucrose | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| casein | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| corn starch | 499.5 | 489.5 | 487 | 489.2 | 488.1 | 486.7 |
| corn oil | 100 | 100 | 92.5 | 100 | 96.25 | 92.5 |
| powdered cellulose | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| mineral mix | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 |
| vitamin mix | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| choline bitartrate | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| orotic acid | — | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| sea cucumber saponins | — | — | — | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.28 |
| sea cucumber phospholipids | — | — | 10 | — | 5 | 10 |
Primer sequences of RT-qPCR amplification.
| gene | forward primer | reverse primer |
|---|---|---|
| FAS | TTGATGATTCAGGGAGTGGA | AGCAGATGAGTTGTTCTTGGAC |
| ME | TCACCTGCCCTAATGTCCCT | CATGCCGTTATCAACTTGTCC |
| G6PDH | GTTTGGCAGCGGCAACTAA | GGCATCACCCTGGTACAACTC |
| SREBP-1c | AACCTCATCCGCCACCTG | TGGTAGACAACAGCCGCATC |
| PPARα | GTACGGCAATGGCTTTATCA | CAATCCCCTCCTGCAACTT |
| ACOX1 | GTATAAACTCTTCCCGCTCCTG | CCAGGTAGTAAAAGCCTTCAGC |
| GAPDH | TGATTCTACCCACGGCAAGTT | TGATGGGTTTCCCATTGATGA |
| ACC | CTAAACCAGCACTCCCGATT | ACTAGGTGCAAGCCAGACAT |
| CPT1 | GCTTCCCCTTACTGGTTCC | AACTGGCAGGCAATGAGACT |
| CPT2 | GCCCAAACCCCATTTTCTA | TAGGCAGAGGCAGAAGACAGCA |
Synergistic effect of EPA-PL and SCS on growth parameters in rats (n = 7). Date are presented as mean ± s.e.m.
| Con | OA | EPA-PL | SCS | EPA-PL : SCS 0.5 : 0.5 | EPA-PL : SCS 1 : 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| initial body weight (g) | 276.3 ± 4.4 | 276.4 ± 3.5a | 276.2 ± 2.7a | 276.4 ± 3.7a | 276.3 ± 1.7a | 276.3 ± 2.7a |
| body weight gain (g) | 49.50 ± 3.5 | 40.43 ± 2.6*a | 45.21 ± 3.7a | 43.3 ± 2.7a | 48.14 ± 2.5b | 45.93 ± 2.3a |
| food intake (g d−1) | 23.63 ± 0.4 | 23.80 ± 0.3a | 23.87 ± 0.6a | 24.25 ± 0.7a | 23.97 ± 0.3a | 23.5 ± 0.8a |
| organ weight (10 g kg−1 body weight) | ||||||
| liver | 3.05 ± 0.32 | 4.36 ± 0.17**b | 4.00 ± 0.13ab | 4.33 ± 0.20b | 4.15 ± 0.13ab | 3.59 ± 0.08a |
| White adipose tissue weight (10 g kg−1 body weight) | ||||||
| epididymal | 1.05 ± 0.06 | 1.29 ± 0.07*b | 1.14 ± 0.05a | 1.31 ± 0.05b | 1.13 ± 0.04a | 1.21 ± 0.05ab |
| perirenal | 1.11 ± 0.16 | 1.13 ± 0.06b | 0.89 ± 0.07a | 1.21 ± 0.08b | 0.94 ± 0.07a | 1.06 ± 0.07ab |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to the Con group. Different letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 determined by ANOVA (Tukey's test).
Synergistic effect of EPA-PL and SCS on serum parameters in rats (n = 7). Date are presented as mean ± s.e.m.
| serum parameters (mmol l−1) | Con | OA | EPA-PL | SCS | EPA-PL : SCS 0.5 : 0.5 | EPA-PL : SCS 1 : 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG | 0.78 ± 0.05 | 0.48 ± 0.10*a | 0.67 ± 0.07b | 0.51 ± 0.07a | 0.63 ± 0.07b | 0.57 ± 0.18ab |
| TC | 2.66 ± 0.11 | 1.69 ± 0.10***a | 2.32 ± 0.20b | 1.99 ± 0.08ab | 2.23 ± 0.06b | 2.03 ± 0.14b |
| FFA | 0.71 ± 0.08 | 0.61 ± 0.05a | 0.66 ± 0.06a | 0.73 ± 0.06a | 0.67 ± 0.10a | 0.77 ± 0.05a |
| glucose | 8.28 ± 0.52 | 7.82 ± 0.36a | 8.31 ± 0.37a | 8.27 ± 0.30a | 8.93 ± 0.29b | 7.96 ± 0.26a |
*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 compared to the Con group. Different letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 determined by ANOVA (Tukey's test).
Figure 1.Synergistic effect of EPA-PL and SCS on hepatic lipid profiling in rats (n = 7). The levels of TG (a), TC (b) and PL (c) were measured from the rats' liver. Date are presented as mean ± s.e.m. (n = 7). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to the Con group. Different letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 determined by ANOVA (Tukey's test).
Figure 2.Synergistic effects of EPA-PL and SCS on hepatic parameters in OA-fed rats. The activities of AST (a) and ALT (b) were measured from the rats' serum. Date are presented as mean ± s.e.m. (n = 7). **p < 0.01 compared to the Con group. Different letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 determined by ANOVA (Tukey's test).
Figure 3.Synergistic effects of EPA-PL and SCS on hepatic mRNA expression involved in fatty acid biosynthesis in rats. The mRNA expression levels of SREBP-1c (a), FAS (b), ACC (c), G6PDH (d) and ME (e) were measured by RT-qPCR and results were normalized by GAPDH. Date are presented as mean ± s.e.m. (n = 7). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to the Con group. Different letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 determined by ANOVA (Tukey's test).
Figure 4.Synergistic effects of EPA-PL and SCS on hepatic mRNA expression involved in fatty acid β-oxidation in rats. The mRNA expression levels of PPARα (a), CPT1 (b), CPT2 (c) and ACOX1 (d) were measured by RT-qPCR and results were normalized by GAPDH. Date are presented as mean ± s.e.m. (n = 7). *p < 0.05 compared to the Con group. Different letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 determined by ANOVA (Tukey's test).
Figure 5.The possible mechanisms involved in the synergistic effects of EPA-PL and SCS in OA-induced NAFLD rats.