Literature DB >> 30108055

Mechanisms for stalled replication fork stabilization: new targets for synthetic lethality strategies in cancer treatments.

Hongwei Liao1, Fang Ji1, Thomas Helleday2,3, Songmin Ying4.   

Abstract

Timely and faithful duplication of the entire genome depends on completion of replication. Replication forks frequently encounter obstacles that may cause genotoxic fork stalling. Nevertheless, failure to complete replication rarely occurs under normal conditions, which is attributed to an intricate network of proteins that serves to stabilize, repair and restart stalled forks. Indeed, many of the components in this network are encoded by tumour suppressor genes, and their loss of function by mutation or deletion generates genomic instability, a hallmark of cancer. Paradoxically, the same fork-protective network also confers resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs that induce high-level replication stress. Here, we review the mechanisms and major pathways rescuing stalled replication forks, with a focus on fork stabilization preventing fork collapse. A coherent understanding of how cells protect their replication forks will not only provide insight into how cells maintain genome stability, but also unravel potential therapeutic targets for cancers refractory to conventional chemotherapies.
© 2018 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PARP inhibitors; fork stabilization; synthetic lethality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30108055      PMCID: PMC6123652          DOI: 10.15252/embr.201846263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN: 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


  195 in total

Review 1.  The p53 tumor suppressor participates in multiple cell cycle checkpoints.

Authors:  Luciana E Giono; James J Manfredi
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 2.  The role of the Fanconi anemia network in the response to DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Kerstin Gari; Angelos Constantinou
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.250

3.  Structure and conformational change of a replication protein A heterotrimer bound to ssDNA.

Authors:  Jie Fan; Nikola P Pavletich
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 4.  Transcription-replication encounters, consequences and genomic instability.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Monica Ballarino; Evgeny Nudler; Laszlo Tora
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 5.  ATR signalling: more than meeting at the fork.

Authors:  Edward A Nam; David Cortez
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Poly(ADP-ribose) binding to Chk1 at stalled replication forks is required for S-phase checkpoint activation.

Authors:  WooKee Min; Christopher Bruhn; Paulius Grigaravicius; Zhong-Wei Zhou; Fu Li; Anja Krüger; Bénazir Siddeek; Karl-Otto Greulich; Oliver Popp; Chris Meisezahl; Cornelis F Calkhoven; Alexander Bürkle; Xingzhi Xu; Zhao-Qi Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  WRN, the protein deficient in Werner syndrome, plays a critical structural role in optimizing DNA repair.

Authors:  Lishan Chen; Shurong Huang; Lin Lee; Albert Davalos; Robert H Schiestl; Judith Campisi; Junko Oshima
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.304

8.  RECQL5 Suppresses Oncogenic JAK2-Induced Replication Stress and Genomic Instability.

Authors:  Edwin Chen; Jong Sook Ahn; David B Sykes; Lawrence J Breyfogle; Anna L Godfrey; Jyoti Nangalia; Amy Ko; Daniel J DeAngelo; Anthony R Green; Ann Mullally
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Cooperation of RAD51 and RAD54 in regression of a model replication fork.

Authors:  Dmitry V Bugreev; Matthew J Rossi; Alexander V Mazin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  CDK1 phosphorylates WRN at collapsed replication forks.

Authors:  Valentina Palermo; Sara Rinalducci; Massimo Sanchez; Francesca Grillini; Joshua A Sommers; Robert M Brosh; Lello Zolla; Annapaola Franchitto; Pietro Pichierri
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  54 in total

Review 1.  DNA-protein crosslinks from environmental exposure: Mechanisms of formation and repair.

Authors:  Yusuke Kojima; Yuichi J Machida
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Berzosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Su-Chun Cheng; Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson; Richard T Penson; Susan T Schumer; L Austin Doyle; Elizabeth K Lee; Elise C Kohn; Linda R Duska; Marta A Crispens; Alexander B Olawaiye; Ira S Winer; Lisa M Barroilhet; Siqing Fu; Michael T McHale; Russell J Schilder; Anniina Färkkilä; Dipanjan Chowdhury; Jennifer Curtis; Roxanne S Quinn; Brittany Bowes; Alan D D'Andrea; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Ursula A Matulonis
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  Therapeutic and prognostic insights from the analysis of cancer mutational signatures.

Authors:  Samuel W Brady; Alexander M Gout; Jinghui Zhang
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Chk1/2 inhibitor AZD7762 enhances the susceptibility of IDH-mutant brain cancer cells to temozolomide.

Authors:  Erkin Ozgiray; Fatma Sogutlu; Cigir Biray Avci
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  PCAF-Mediated Histone Acetylation Promotes Replication Fork Degradation by MRE11 and EXO1 in BRCA-Deficient Cells.

Authors:  Jae Jin Kim; Seo Yun Lee; Ji-Hye Choi; Hyun Goo Woo; Blerta Xhemalce; Kyle M Miller
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 6.  Inflammation-induced DNA damage, mutations and cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Kay; Elina Thadhani; Leona Samson; Bevin Engelward
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-25

7.  NSMF promotes the replication stress-induced DNA damage response for genome maintenance.

Authors:  Min Kyung Ju; Kyeong Jin Shin; Joo Rak Lee; Keon Woo Khim; Eun A Lee; Jae Sun Ra; Byung-Gyu Kim; Han-Seul Jo; Jong Hyuk Yoon; Tae Moon Kim; Kyungjae Myung; Jang Hyun Choi; Hongtae Kim; Young Chan Chae
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  CtIP is essential for telomere replication.

Authors:  Susanna Stroik; Kevin Kurtz; Eric A Hendrickson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Replication Fork Reversal and Protection.

Authors:  Shan Qiu; Guixing Jiang; Liping Cao; Jun Huang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-10

10.  EXO5-DNA structure and BLM interactions direct DNA resection critical for ATR-dependent replication restart.

Authors:  Shashank Hambarde; Chi-Lin Tsai; Raj K Pandita; Albino Bacolla; Anirban Maitra; Vijay Charaka; Clayton R Hunt; Rakesh Kumar; Oliver Limbo; Remy Le Meur; Walter J Chazin; Susan E Tsutakawa; Paul Russell; Katharina Schlacher; Tej K Pandita; John A Tainer
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 19.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.