Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos1, Su-Chun Cheng2, Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson3, Richard T Penson4, Susan T Schumer2, L Austin Doyle5, Elizabeth K Lee2, Elise C Kohn5, Linda R Duska6, Marta A Crispens7, Alexander B Olawaiye8, Ira S Winer9, Lisa M Barroilhet10, Siqing Fu11, Michael T McHale12, Russell J Schilder13, Anniina Färkkilä2, Dipanjan Chowdhury2, Jennifer Curtis2, Roxanne S Quinn2, Brittany Bowes2, Alan D D'Andrea2, Geoffrey I Shapiro2, Ursula A Matulonis2. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: panagiotis_konstantinopoulos@dfci.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN, USA. 8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA. 10. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA. 11. Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 12. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. 13. Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:High-grade serous ovarian cancers show increased replication stress, rendering cells vulnerable to ATR inhibition because of near universal loss of the G1/S checkpoint (through deleterious TP53 mutations), premature S phase entry (due to CCNE1 amplification, RB1 loss, or CDKN2A mRNA downregulation), alterations of homologous recombination repair genes, and expression of oncogenic drivers (through MYC amplification and other mechanisms). We hypothesised that the combination of the selective ATR inhibitor, berzosertib, and gemcitabine could show acceptable toxicity and superior efficacy to gemcitabine alone in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study, 11 different centres in the US Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network enrolled women (aged ≥18 years) with recurrent, platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer (determined histologically) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, who had unlimited previous lines of cytotoxic therapy in the platinum-sensitive setting but no more than one line of cytotoxic therapy in the platinum-resistant setting. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on day 1 and day 8, or gemcitabine plus intravenous berzosertib (210 mg/m2) on day 2 and day 9 of a 21-day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Randomisation was done centrally using the Theradex Interactive Web Response System, stratified by platinum-free interval, and with a permuted block size of six. Following central randomisation, patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, and analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02595892, and is active but closed to enrolment. FINDINGS:Between Feb 14, 2017, and Sept 7, 2018, 88 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 70 were randomly assigned to treatment with gemcitabine alone (36 patients) or gemcitabine plus berzosertib (34 patients). At the data cutoff date (Feb 21, 2020), the median follow-up was 53·2 weeks (25·6-81·8) in the gemcitabine plus berzosertib group and 43·0 weeks (IQR 23·2-69·1) in the gemcitabine alone group. Median progression-free survival was 22·9 weeks (17·9-72·0) for gemcitabine plus berzosertib and 14·7 weeks (90% CI 9·7-36·7) for gemcitabine alone (hazard ratio 0·57, 90% CI 0·33-0·98; one-sided log-rank test p=0·044). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (14 [39%] of 36 patients in the gemcitabine alone group vs 16 [47%] of 34 patients in the gemcitabine plus berzosertib group) and decreased platelet count (two [6%] vs eight [24%]). Serious adverse events were observed in ten (28%) patients in the gemcitabine alone group and nine (26%) patients in the gemcitabine plus berzosertib group. There was one treatment-related death in the gemcitabine alone group due to sepsis and one treatment-related death in the gemcitabine plus berzosertib group due to pneumonitis. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the first randomised study of an ATR inhibitor in any tumour type. This study shows a benefit of adding berzosertib to gemcitabine in platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer. This combination warrants further investigation in this setting. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: High-grade serous ovarian cancers show increased replication stress, rendering cells vulnerable to ATR inhibition because of near universal loss of the G1/S checkpoint (through deleterious TP53 mutations), premature S phase entry (due to CCNE1 amplification, RB1 loss, or CDKN2A mRNA downregulation), alterations of homologous recombination repair genes, and expression of oncogenic drivers (through MYC amplification and other mechanisms). We hypothesised that the combination of the selective ATR inhibitor, berzosertib, and gemcitabine could show acceptable toxicity and superior efficacy to gemcitabine alone in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study, 11 different centres in the US Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network enrolled women (aged ≥18 years) with recurrent, platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer (determined histologically) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, who had unlimited previous lines of cytotoxic therapy in the platinum-sensitive setting but no more than one line of cytotoxic therapy in the platinum-resistant setting. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on day 1 and day 8, or gemcitabine plus intravenous berzosertib (210 mg/m2) on day 2 and day 9 of a 21-day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Randomisation was done centrally using the Theradex Interactive Web Response System, stratified by platinum-free interval, and with a permuted block size of six. Following central randomisation, patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, and analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02595892, and is active but closed to enrolment. FINDINGS: Between Feb 14, 2017, and Sept 7, 2018, 88 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 70 were randomly assigned to treatment with gemcitabine alone (36 patients) or gemcitabine plus berzosertib (34 patients). At the data cutoff date (Feb 21, 2020), the median follow-up was 53·2 weeks (25·6-81·8) in the gemcitabine plus berzosertib group and 43·0 weeks (IQR 23·2-69·1) in the gemcitabine alone group. Median progression-free survival was 22·9 weeks (17·9-72·0) for gemcitabine plus berzosertib and 14·7 weeks (90% CI 9·7-36·7) for gemcitabine alone (hazard ratio 0·57, 90% CI 0·33-0·98; one-sided log-rank test p=0·044). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (14 [39%] of 36 patients in the gemcitabine alone group vs 16 [47%] of 34 patients in the gemcitabine plus berzosertib group) and decreased platelet count (two [6%] vs eight [24%]). Serious adverse events were observed in ten (28%) patients in the gemcitabine alone group and nine (26%) patients in the gemcitabine plus berzosertib group. There was one treatment-related death in the gemcitabine alone group due to sepsis and one treatment-related death in the gemcitabine plus berzosertib group due to pneumonitis. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the first randomised study of an ATR inhibitor in any tumour type. This study shows a benefit of adding berzosertib to gemcitabine in platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer. This combination warrants further investigation in this setting. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute.
Authors: Sarah J Hill; Brennan Decker; Emma A Roberts; Neil S Horowitz; Michael G Muto; Michael J Worley; Colleen M Feltmate; Marisa R Nucci; Elizabeth M Swisher; Huy Nguyen; Chunyu Yang; Ryuji Morizane; Bose S Kochupurakkal; Khanh T Do; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Joyce F Liu; Joseph V Bonventre; Ursula A Matulonis; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Ross S Berkowitz; Christopher P Crum; Alan D D'Andrea Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; William T Barry; Michael Birrer; Shannon N Westin; Karen A Cadoo; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Erica L Mayer; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Robert L Coleman; Bose Kochupurakkal; Christin Whalen; Jennifer Curtis; Sarah Farooq; Weixiu Luo; Julia Eismann; Mary K Buss; Carol Aghajanian; Gordon B Mills; Sangeetha Palakurthi; Paul Kirschmeier; Joyce Liu; Lewis C Cantley; Scott H Kaufmann; Elizabeth M Swisher; Alan D D'Andrea; Eric Winer; Gerburg M Wulf; Ursula A Matulonis Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Raphael Ceccaldi; Kevin W O'Connor; Kent W Mouw; Adam Y Li; Ursula A Matulonis; Alan D D'Andrea; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Yann Wallez; Charles R Dunlop; Timothy Isaac Johnson; Siang-Boon Koh; Chiara Fornari; James W T Yates; Sandra Bernaldo de Quirós Fernández; Alan Lau; Frances M Richards; Duncan I Jodrell Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2018-06-11 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Sarah E Fordham; Helen J Blair; Claire J Elstob; Ruth Plummer; Yvette Drew; Nicola J Curtin; Olaf Heidenreich; Deepali Pal; David Jamieson; Catherine Park; John Pollard; Scott Fields; Paul Milne; Graham H Jackson; Helen J Marr; Tobias Menne; Gail L Jones; James M Allan Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2018-05-22
Authors: Cyriac Kandoth; Nikolaus Schultz; Andrew D Cherniack; Rehan Akbani; Yuexin Liu; Hui Shen; A Gordon Robertson; Itai Pashtan; Ronglai Shen; Christopher C Benz; Christina Yau; Peter W Laird; Li Ding; Wei Zhang; Gordon B Mills; Raju Kucherlapati; Elaine R Mardis; Douglas A Levine Journal: Nature Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Alexandre André B A da Costa; Dipanjan Chowdhury; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Alan D D'Andrea; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 112.288
Authors: Arun Kanakkanthara; Larry M Karnitz; Thomas L Ekstrom; Nicholas M Pathoulas; Amelia M Huehls Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 6.261