| Literature DB >> 30107546 |
Felicity C Fitzgerald1, Edouard Lhomme2,3,4, Kathryn Harris5, Julia Kenny1, Ronan Doyle5, Cissy Kityo6, Liam P Shaw1, George Abongomera7, Victor Musiime6, Adrian Cook8, Julianne R Brown5, Anthony Brooks9, Ellen Owen-Powell8, Diana M Gibb8, Andrew J Prendergast10,11, A Sarah Walker8, Rodolphe Thiebaut2,3,4, Nigel Klein1.
Abstract
Objective: Immune activation is associated with morbidity and mortality during human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, despite receipt of antiretroviral therapy (ART). We investigated whether microbial translocation drives immune activation in HIV-infected Ugandan children.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30107546 PMCID: PMC6284549 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy495
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect Dis ISSN: 0022-1899 Impact factor: 5.226
Characteristics of Antiretroviral (ART)–Naive and ART-Experienced Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)–Infected Children and Age-Matched HIV-Uninfected Controls
| Characteristic | HIV-Infected Children | HIV-Uninfected Children | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ART Naive (n = 120) | ART Experienced (n = 22) |
| Matched to Naive Group (n = 87) |
| Matched to ART- Experienced Group (n = 20) |
| |
| Male sex | 59 (49) | 10 (45) | .82 | 40 (46) | .67 | 12 (60) | .37 |
| Age, y | 2.8 (1.7–4.0) | 6.5 (5.9–9.2) | <.001 | 3.3 (2.4–4.4) | .004 | 6.3 (5.7–8.9) | .89 |
| Baseline CD4+ T-cell count, cells/mm3 | 922 (637–1451) | 1188 (928–1813) | .02 | 1361 (1039–1728) | <.001 | 1010 (856–1343) | .11 |
| Baseline CD4+ T-cell percentage | 20 (14–24) | 35 (31–39) | <.001 | 38 (34–43) | <.001 | 40 (35–45) | .06 |
| Baseline viral load, copies/mL | 386800 (166500– | <100 | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Change in CD4+ T-cell count from baseline t o wk 96, cells/mm3 | 314 (−38–657) | −157 (−438–59) | <.001 | NA | NA | ||
| Change in CD4+ T-cell percentage from baseline to wk 96 | 17 (12–22) | 3 (0–6) | <.001 | NA | NA | ||
| Viral load <100 copies/mL at wk 96 | 84/111 (76) | 19/21 (91) | .16 | NA | NA | ||
| Baseline weight-for-age | −2.0 (−3.2 to −0.9) | −1.5 (−2.2 to −0.4) | .05 | −0.6 (−1.2–0.1) | <.001 | −1.0 (−2.1 to −0.1) | .57 |
| Baseline height-for-age | −2.5 (−3.5 to −1.3) | −1.5 (−2.1 to −1.1) | .02 | −0.8 (−2.1–0.1) | <.001 | −1.3 (−2.5 to −0.3) | .52 |
| Weight-for-age | 1.0 (0.2–1.9) | −0.1 (−0.2–0.0) | <.001 | NA | NA | ||
| Height-for-age | 0.8 (0.2–1.3) | −0.1 (−0.3 to −1.4) | <.001 | NA | NA | ||
Data are no. or proportion (%) of children or median (interquartile range). Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 or Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.
Figure 1.Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) results over time ranked by negative to strong positive. Colony-forming unit (CFU) equivalents as compared to cycle threshold values of standards with a known CFU quantity and categorized from negative to strong positive. For each category, the total percentage of positive samples (ie, those with a result > 0) is equal to 100% minus the percentage of negative samples, shown at the left of each subpanel. ART, antiretroviral therapy.
Figure 2.Results of next-generation sequencing. Positive controls are mock communities (Supplementary Materials). Phylogenetic tree, by antiretroviral therapy (ART) group (experienced or naive). Negative control operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were removed (rarefied), showing sparse OTUs, including Staphylococcaceae among other families. OTUs derived from both ART-experienced and ART-naive samples are distributed across the phylogenetic tree.
Characteristics and Microbial Translocation Markers, by Cluster Group
| Characteristic | Cluster 1 (n = 109) | Cluster 2 (n = 33) | Cluster 3 (n = 107) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of all children | 44 | 13 | 43 | |
| ART status at baseline, no. (%) | <.0001 | |||
| Experienced | 16 (15) | 3 (9) | 3 (3) | |
| Naive | 6 (5) | 10 (30) | 104 (97) | |
| HIV uninfected | 87 (80) | 20 (61) | 0 (0) | |
| Viral load among HIV-infected children | ||||
| Baseline | 100 (100–245) | 606275 (106390–1998000) | 336520 (141390–949650) | <.0001 |
| Wk 96 | 100 (100–100) | 171 (110–61190) | 100 (100–110) | <.0001 |
| Virological suppressiona at wk 96 | <.0001 | |||
| Yes | 20 (19) | 3 (3) | 80 (78) | |
| No | 2b (7) | 9 (31) | 18 (62) | |
| HIV uninfected | 87 (81) | 20 (19) | 0 (0) | |
| Viral load data missing | 0 (0) | 1 (10) | 9 (90) | |
| Bacterial data | ||||
| Baseline | 109 | 33 | 107 | |
| I-FABP level, pg/mL | 118 (59 -222) | 100 (57–165) | 86 (40–138) | .008 |
| 16S rDNA positivity | 99 (92) | 28 (85) | 84 (79) | .32 |
| | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 6 (6) | .02 |
| | 9 (8) | 4 (12) | 10 (9) | .68 |
| | 0 (0) | 1 (3) | 0 (0) | .13 |
| | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | .99 |
| Enterobacteriaceae positivity | 48 (44) | 7 (21) | 21 (20) | <.0001 |
| | 1 (1) | 1 (3) | 1 (1) | .51 |
| | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | .99 |
| Wk 72 | 109 | 33 | 106 | |
| I-FABP level, pg/mL | 150 (80–234) | 159 (99–194) | 146 (82–195) | .83 |
| 16S rDNA positivity | 101 (93) | 30 (91) | 103 (96) | .18 |
| | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| | 3 (3) | 0 (0) | 5 (5) | .26 |
| | 0 (0) | 1 (3) | 0 (0) | .13 |
| | 1 (1) | 1 (3) | 1 (1) | .51 |
| Enterobacteriaceae positivity | 48 (44) | 3 (9) | 31 (29) | .001 |
| | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | .55 |
Data are no. (%) of children or median (interquartile range). Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 or Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Abbreviations: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; I-FABP, intestinal fatty acid binding protein; rDNA, ribosomal DNA.
aDefined as <100 copies/mL.
bViral loads were 935 and 2140 copies/mL.
Figure 3.Box plots of log concentrations of tumor necrosis factor, activated CD4+ T cells (defined as, T cells double positive for HLA-DR and CD38), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, by cluster group, at baseline (week 0; left column) and week 96 (right column). P values were determined by the Kruskal-Wallis test. For concentrations of the complete set of biomarkers, see Supplementary Figure 5.