| Literature DB >> 24836781 |
Cally J Tann1, Peter Nkurunziza2, Margaret Nakakeeto3, James Oweka2, Jennifer J Kurinczuk4, Jackson Were2, Natasha Nyombi3, Peter Hughes5, Barbara A Willey6, Alison M Elliott7, Nicola J Robertson5, Nigel Klein8, Kathryn A Harris8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In neonatal encephalopathy (NE), infectious co-morbidity is difficult to diagnose accurately, but may increase the vulnerability of the developing brain to hypoxia-ischemia. We developed a novel panel of species-specific real-time PCR assays to identify bloodstream pathogens amongst newborns with and without NE in Uganda.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24836781 PMCID: PMC4023955 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Primer and probe target genes, sensitivities and sequences for the Real-Time PCR assays.
| Organism | Target gene | Assay sensitivity | Reference | Primer and probe sequences | Multiplex Reaction Mixtures |
|
| coa | 0.1–1 cfu/reaction | Sabet 2006 | coa-forward: |
|
| coa-reverse: | |||||
| coa-probe: 5′FAM- TAGGCGCATTAGCAGTTGCATC-BHQ1 | |||||
|
|
| 0.1–1 cfu/reaction | This study | GAS-forward: | |
| GAS-reverse: | |||||
| GAS-probe: 5′-JOE- CGGTGCAGACGACTATATTGTTAAACC-BHQ1 | |||||
| InternalPositivecontrol (IPC) |
| NA | This study | IPC-forward: | |
| IPC-reverse: | |||||
| IPC-probe: 5′Cy5-TTGGGAACAAAACACCCATGGAAGGA-BHQ2 | |||||
|
|
| 0.1–1 cfu/reaction | Harris et al 2008 | lytA-forward: |
|
| lytA-reverse: | |||||
| lytA-probe: 5′FAM- TTTGCCGAAAACGCTTGATACAGGG-BHQ1 | |||||
|
|
| 0.1–1 cfu/reaction | Berseng et al 2007/Probe this study | GBS-forward: | |
| GBS-reverse: | |||||
| GBS-probe: 5′ JOE- ATCAGAAGAGTCATACTGCYACTTC-BHQ1 | |||||
| Enterobacteriaceae family |
| 1–10 cfu/reaction | This study | ent-forward: 5′-ACCTGGGTACWACCAACTCTTGTGT |
|
| ent-reverse: | |||||
| ent-probe: 5′-JOE-AGGATGGTGAAACTCTGGTWGGTCAGCC-BHQ1 | |||||
|
|
| 1–10 cfu/reaction | This study | tuf-forward: 5′-CATTCCAACTCCAGAACGTGAYT | |
| tuf-reverse: | |||||
| tuf-probe: 5′-CY5-TGAYAAACCATTCATGATGCCAGTTGAGG-BBQ | |||||
| CMV | DNA polymerase | 5 copies/reaction | This study | CMV-forward: |
|
| CMV-reverse: | |||||
| CMV-probe: 5′-CY5-TGCGCCGTATGCTGCTCGACA-BBQ | |||||
| Plasmodium falciparum | SSU RNA | <3parasites/ul | Adegnika et al 2006 | PFal-forward: | |
| Plas-reverse: | |||||
| Pfal-probe: 5′- FAM-CTT TCG AGG TGA CTT TTA GAT- | |||||
| HSV 1 and 2 | DNA polymerase | 5 copies/reaction | This study | HSV-forward: |
|
| HSV-reverse: | |||||
| HSV1-probe: 5′-FAM-CATGACCCTTGTGAAACA-MGB | |||||
| HSV-2-probe: 5′-VIC-TGACCTTCGTCAAGCAG-MGB |
Figure 1Flow diagram of study case and control participant.
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of mothers and babies.
| Characteristic | Case | Control | P-value |
| N(%) | N(%) | ||
|
| |||
| Maternal education≤primary level | 79/202 (39.1) | 45/100 (45.0) | 0.327 |
| Nulliparity | 118/202 (58.4) | 49/101 (48.5) | 0.102 |
| Emergency caesarean section | 49/201(24.4) | 23/101(22.8) | 0.757 |
| Intrapartum antibiotics | 37/201 (18.4) | 16/101 (15.8) | 0.580 |
|
| |||
| Male sex | 132/202 (65.4) | 48/101 (47.5) | 0.003 |
| Mean birth weight (g) | 3183 | 3033 | 0.0061 |
| 1 minute APGAR <3 | 65/195 (33.3) | 1/99 (1) | <0.0001 |
| 5 minute APGAR <7 | 126/177 (71.2) | 1/98 (1) | <0.0001 |
| Case fatality | 68/200(34.0) | 0/96 (0.0) | <0.0001 |
chi-squared test.
Comparison of species specific bacterial qPCR and BACTEC blood culture for detection of pathogenic bacteria in blood samples amongst neonatal encephalopathy case infants.
| Blood Culture | |||
| Positive | Negative | ||
|
| 3 | 11 | 14 |
|
| 4 | 184 | 188 |
| 7 | 195 | 202 |
Results of blood culture, real-time PCR assays and sequencing of positives.
| Patient | Blood culture | PCR | Sequence | Intrapartum antibiotics | CRP | CRP |
| Day 1 | Day 3 | |||||
|
| ||||||
| Case 61 | Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus | Group B Streptococcus | – | Yes | 16.86 | 50.4 |
| Case 81 | Negative | Group B Streptococcus | – | No | 47.52 | Died D1 |
| Case 170 | Negative | Group B Streptococcus | – | No | 4.23 | Died D1 |
|
| ||||||
| Case 133 | Negative | Group A Streptococcus | – | No | 61.16 | Died D1 |
| Case 150 | Group C Streptococcus | Negative | – | No | 0.28 | 1.02 |
|
| ||||||
| Case 37 |
| Negative | – | No | 6.22 | 4.03 |
| Case 83 | Negative |
| – | No | 2.28 | 30.4 |
| Case 157 |
| Negative | – | Yes | 81.55 | 63.06 |
| Case 166 |
| Negative | – | No | 8.18 | 20.41 |
| Control 5 | Not performed |
| – | No | 55.56 | n/a |
|
| ||||||
| Case 41 | Negative | Enterobacteriaceae |
| No | 7.58 | insuff |
| Case 53 |
| Enterobacteriaceae |
| No | 1.1 | Died D1 |
| Case 56 | Negative | Enterobacteriaceae | Failed | No | 0.47 | Died D1 |
| Case 64 | Negative | Enterobacteriaceae | Failed | No | 0.22 | 13.16 |
| Case 67 | Negative | Enterobacteriaceae |
| No | 0.14 | Died D1 |
| Case 82 | Negative | Enterobacteriaceae |
| No | 8.91 | Died D1 |
| Case 117 | Negative | Enterobacteriaceae |
| Yes | 32.81 | Died D1 |
|
| ||||||
| Case 132 |
|
| – | No | 49.01 | – |
| Enterobacteriaceae |
| |||||
| Cytomegalovirus | – | |||||
| Case 49 |
| Enterobacteriaceae |
| Yes | 3.61 | 9.32 |
|
| – | |||||
| Control 65 | Not performed | Enterobacteriaceae |
| No | 1.83 | n/a |
|
| – | |||||
|
| ||||||
| Case 10 | Negative | Cytomegalovirus | – | n/a | 2.68 | Died D1 |
| Case 16 | Negative | Cytomegalovirus | – | n/a | 0.16 | Died D1 |
| Control 21 | Not perform | Cytomegalovirus | – | n/a | 0.32 | n/a |
| Case 175 | Negative | Herpes Simplex Virus 1 | – | n/a | 0.35 | 2.79 |
| Control 98 | Not performed |
| – | n/a | 1.38 | n/a |