Literature DB >> 30107489

Reduction in mortality from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients is dependent on the presence of left ventricular scar.

Sarah J Gutman1,2,3, Benedict T Costello1,2,3, Stavroula Papapostolou1,3, Aleksandr Voskoboinik1,2,4,5, Leah Iles1,2, Johnson Ja1, James L Hare1,2, Andris Ellims1, Peter M Kistler1,2,3,5, Thomas H Marwick1,2,3, Andrew J Taylor1,2,3.   

Abstract

Aims: In patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), the mortality benefit of a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been challenged. Left ventricular (LV) scar identified by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is associated with a high risk of malignant arrhythmia in NICM. We aimed to determine the impact of LV scar on the mortality benefit from a primary prevention ICD in NICM. Methods and results: We recruited 452 consecutive heart failure patients [New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II/III] with NICM and LV ejection fraction ≤35% from a state-wide CMR service. All patients fulfilled European Society of Cardiology guidelines for primary prevention ICD implantation; however, the decision to implant was at the treating physician's discretion. Baseline clinical and CMR data were recorded prospectively and heart failure mortality risk (MAGGIC score) was calculated. The primary study outcome measurement was all-cause mortality based on presence or absence of ICD, stratified by LV scar. Median follow-up was 37.9 months and there was no difference in MAGGIC score between those who did and did not receive a primary prevention ICD (19.30 ± 5.46 vs. 18.90 ± 5.67, P = 0.50). In patients without LV scar, ICD implantation was not associated with improved mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-2.78, P = 0.64]. In patients with LV scar, ICD implantation was independently associated with reduced mortality (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.26-0.77, P = 0.003). Conclusions: In patients with NICM, primary prevention ICD implantation is only associated with reduced mortality in patients with LV scar. This may enable more effective selection of NICM patients for ICD implantation compared with current guidelines.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30107489     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  9 in total

1.  Ischemic and non-ischemic patterns of late gadolinium enhancement in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Patrycja S Matusik; Amira Bryll; Paweł T Matusik; Tadeusz J Popiela
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 2.  Certain beta blockers (e.g., bisoprolol) may be reevaluated in hypertension guidelines for patients with left ventricular hypertrophy to diminish the ventricular arrhythmic risk.

Authors:  Goran Koracevic; Milovan Stojanovic; Dragan Lovic; Marija Zdravkovic; Dejan Sakac
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on risk assessment in cardiac arrhythmias: use the right tool for the right outcome, in the right population.

Authors:  Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Marcio Jansen de Oliveira Figueiredo; Alireza Sepehri Shamloo; Alberto Alfie; Serge Boveda; Nikolaos Dagres; Dario Di Toro; Lee L Eckhardt; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Carina Hardy; Takanori Ikeda; Aparna Jaswal; Elizabeth Kaufman; Andrew Krahn; Kengo Kusano; Valentina Kutyifa; Han S Lim; Gregory Y H Lip; Santiago Nava-Townsend; Hui-Nam Pak; Gerardo Rodríguez Diez; William Sauer; Anil Saxena; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen; Diego Vanegas; Marmar Vaseghi; Arthur Wilde; T Jared Bunch; Alfred E Buxton; Gonzalo Calvimontes; Tze-Fan Chao; Lars Eckardt; Heidi Estner; Anne M Gillis; Rodrigo Isa; Josef Kautzner; Philippe Maury; Joshua D Moss; Gi-Byung Nam; Brian Olshansky; Luis Fernando Pava Molano; Mauricio Pimentel; Mukund Prabhu; Wendy S Tzou; Philipp Sommer; Janice Swampillai; Alejandro Vidal; Thomas Deneke; Gerhard Hindricks; Christophe Leclercq
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 4.  Multi-Modality Imaging in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: With a Focus on the Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Panagiota Mitropoulou; Georgios Georgiopoulos; Stefano Figliozzi; Dimitrios Klettas; Flavia Nicoli; Pier Giorgio Masci
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-07-02

Review 5.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

Authors:  Giorgio Faganello; Aldostefano Porcari; Federico Biondi; Marco Merlo; Antonio De Luca; Giancarlo Vitrella; Manuel Belgrano; Lorenzo Pagnan; Andrea Di Lenarda; Gianfranco Sinagra
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

6.  Impact of sex, socio-economic status, and remoteness on therapy and survival in heart failure.

Authors:  Sarah J Gutman; Ben T Costello; Stavroula Papapostolou; Leah Iles; Johnson Ja; James L Hare; Andris Ellims; Thomas H Marwick; Andrew J Taylor
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-10-16

Review 7.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation and Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Ivo Roca-Luque; Lluis Mont-Girbau
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-12

8.  The year in cardiovascular medicine 2020: digital health and innovation.

Authors:  Charalambos Antoniades; Folkert W Asselbergs; Panos Vardas
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 9.  CMR-Based Risk Stratification of Sudden Cardiac Death and Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Laura Keil; Céleste Chevalier; Paulus Kirchhof; Stefan Blankenberg; Gunnar Lund; Kai Müllerleile; Christina Magnussen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.