| Literature DB >> 30105099 |
Anthony P Morise1, Jennifer Tennant1, Sari D Holmes1, Danyel H Tacker2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have demonstrated significant effects on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and nonhigh density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. To date, there have been limited reports on the effect of PCSK9 inhibitors on remnant cholesterol.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30105099 PMCID: PMC6076932 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9194736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Lipids ISSN: 2090-3049
Baseline characteristics of patient sample.
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 64.1 ± 11.7 | ||
| Female | 65 (60) | ||
| PCSK9 Inhibitor | |||
| Evolocumab 140mg | 62 (57) | ||
| Alirocumab 75mg | 23 (21) | ||
| Alirocumab 150 mg | 24 (22) | ||
| ASCVD | 98 (90) | ||
| Coronary | 87 | ||
| Peripheral | 2 | ||
| Cerebral | 1 | ||
| Polyvascular | 2 | ||
| Coronary calcium | 6 | ||
| FH without ASCVD | 11 (10) | ||
| Diabetes | 37 (34) | ||
| Lipid diagnosis ASCVD | |||
| Hypercholesterolemia alone | 61 (56) | ||
| Combined hyperlipidemia | 37 (34) | ||
| Therapy |
|
|
|
| ASCVD | 78 (80) | 20 (20) | 44 (45) |
| FH | 9 (82) | 2 (18) | 2 (18) |
ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; FH, familial hypercholesterolemia; LLRx, lipid lowering therapy; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9.
Data presented as frequency (%) or mean ± SD.
Lipid levels before and after treatment.
|
|
| % |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cholesterol | 259.6 ± 70.1 | 151.5 ± 52.7 | –41% | <0.001 |
| HDLc | 45.1 ± 11.3 | 46.0 ± 11.8 | 2% | 0.228 |
| NonHDLc | 215.1 ± 68.6 | 106.5 ± 52.4 | –50% | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides | 255.3 ± 161.7 | 191.9 ± 99.8 | –24% | <0.001 |
| LDLc | ||||
| Friedewald equation | 167.0 ± 57.2 | 70.11 ± 47.2 | –58% | <0.001 |
| Direct measurement | 174.5 ± 57.2 | 76.9 ± 46.4 | –56% | <0.001 |
| Martin/Hopkins method | 171.3 ± 56.4 | 76.9 ± 46.0 | –55% | <0.001 |
| Remnant cholesterol | ||||
| Friedewald equation LDLc | 48.1 ± 28.2 | 36.4 ± 16.5 | –24% | <0.001 |
| Direct measurement LDLc | 40.6 ± 29.9 | 29.6 ± 15.4 | –27% | <0.001 |
| Martin/Hopkins method LDLc | 43.8 ± 27.2 | 29.6 ± 13.1 | –32% | <0.001 |
| Apolipoprotein B ( | 141.4 ± 40.8 | 74.2 ± 30.5 | –48% | <0.001 |
HDLc = high density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDLc = low density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Figure 1Change in remnant cholesterol levels from pretreatment to posttreatment by pretreatment triglyceride groups (error bars: 95% CI).
Figure 2Change in LDL cholesterol levels from pretreatment to posttreatment by pretreatment triglyceride groups (error bars: 95% CI).
Results of the multivariable linear regression analyses for change in remnant cholesterol when LDL was derived by 3 different methodologies.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | –0.21 | –0.10 | 0.708 |
| Female | 8.79 | 0.18 | 0.074 |
| Diabetes | –5.25 | –0.10 | 0.278 |
| ASCVD | 0.87 | 0.01 | 0.913 |
| Statin | –2.45 | –0.04 | 0.669 |
| Alirocumab 75mg vs evolocumab 140mg | –8.39 | –0.14 | 0.156 |
| Alirocumab 150mg vs evolocumab 140mg | –12.09 | –0.21 | 0.036 |
| Triglyceride group (high vs low) | –20.06 | –0.41 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Age | –0.31 | –0.14 | 0.193 |
| Female | 8.39 | 0.16 | 0.113 |
| Diabetes | –1.61 | –0.03 | 0.757 |
| ASCVD | 2.90 | 0.04 | 0.734 |
| Statin | –8.60 | –0.14 | 0.165 |
| Alirocumab 75mg vs evolocumab 140mg | –1.56 | –0.03 | 0.806 |
| Alirocumab 150mg vs evolocumab 140mg | –7.29 | –0.12 | 0.236 |
| Triglyceride group (high vs low) | –16.29 | –0.32 | 0.001 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Age | –0.27 | –0.14 | 0.185 |
| Female | 8.62 | 0.19 | 0.053 |
| Diabetes | –4.16 | –0.09 | 0.342 |
| ASCVD | 1.15 | 0.02 | 0.872 |
| Statin | –0.87 | –0.02 | 0.866 |
| Alirocumab 75mg vs evolocumab 140mg | –6.04 | –0.11 | 0.259 |
| Alirocumab 150mg vs evolocumab 140mg | –12.76 | –0.24 | 0.015 |
| Triglyceride group (high vs low) | –16.76 | –0.38 | <0.001 |
ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.