Literature DB >> 30104432

Environmentally induced changes to brain morphology predict cognitive performance.

Thomas W Pike1, Michael Ramsey2,3, Anna Wilkinson2,4.   

Abstract

The relationship between the size and structure of a species' brain and its cognitive capacity has long interested scientists. Generally, this work relates interspecific variation in brain anatomy with performance on a variety of cognitive tasks. However, brains are known to show considerable short-term plasticity in response to a range of social, ecological and environmental factors. Despite this, we have a remarkably poor understanding of how this impacts on an animal's cognitive performance. Here, we non-invasively manipulated the relative size of brain regions associated with processing visual and chemical information in fish (the optic tectum and olfactory bulbs, respectively). We then tested performance in a cognitive task in which information from the two sensory modalities was in conflict. Although the fish could effectively use both visual and chemical information if presented in isolation, when they received cues from both modalities simultaneously, those with a relatively better developed optic tectum showed a greater reliance on visual information, while individuals with relatively better developed olfactory bulbs showed a greater reliance on chemical information. These results suggest that short-term changes in brain structure, possibly resulting from an attempt to minimize the costs of developing unnecessary but energetically expensive brain regions, may have marked effects on cognitive performance.This article is part of the theme issue 'Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities'.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Keywords:  Pungitius pungitius; animal cognition; behavioural plasticity; nine-spined stickleback; numerosity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30104432      PMCID: PMC6107565          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  33 in total

1.  Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Marco Dadda; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Understanding vertebrate brain evolution.

Authors:  R Glenn Northcutt
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  Brain size affects performance in a reversal-learning test.

Authors:  Séverine D Buechel; Annika Boussard; Alexander Kotrschal; Wouter van der Bijl; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Proliferation, migration, neuronal differentiation, and long-term survival of new cells in the adult zebrafish brain.

Authors:  Günther K H Zupanc; Karen Hinsch; Fred H Gage
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Quantification acuity in spontaneous shoaling decisions of three-spined sticklebacks.

Authors:  Marion Mehlis; Timo Thünken; Theo C M Bakker; Joachim G Frommen
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Lateral line diversity among ecologically divergent threespine stickleback populations.

Authors:  A R Wark; C L Peichel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Population variation in brain size of nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius)--local adaptation or environmentally induced variation?

Authors:  Abigél Gonda; Gábor Herczeg; Juha Merilä
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Acoustic noise induces attention shifts and reduces foraging performance in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Julia Purser; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Female brain size affects the assessment of male attractiveness during mate choice.

Authors:  Alberto Corral-López; Natasha I Bloch; Alexander Kotrschal; Wouter van der Bijl; Severine D Buechel; Judith E Mank; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Use of number by fish.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Marco Dadda; Giovanna Serena; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Brain morphology correlates of learning and cognitive flexibility in a fish species (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Zegni Triki; Maria Granell-Ruiz; Stephanie Fong; Mirjam Amcoff; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Measuring and understanding individual differences in cognition.

Authors:  Neeltje J Boogert; Joah R Madden; Julie Morand-Ferron; Alex Thornton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Julien Dubois; Paola Galdi; Lynn K Paul; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Differences in brain morphology of brown trout across stream, lake, and hatchery environments.

Authors:  Libor Závorka; J Peter Koene; Tiffany A Armstrong; Lena Fehlinger; Colin E Adams
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 5.  Neural substrates involved in the cognitive information processing in teleost fish.

Authors:  R Calvo; V Schluessel
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Stress hormones, social associations and song learning in zebra finches.

Authors:  Neeltje J Boogert; Robert F Lachlan; Karen A Spencer; Christopher N Templeton; Damien R Farine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Habitat and social context affect memory phenotype, exploration and covariance among these traits.

Authors:  Sarah Dalesman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Reduced exploration capacity despite brain volume increase in warm-acclimated common minnow.

Authors:  Libor Závorka; Barbara Koeck; Tiffany A Armstrong; Mustafa Soğanci; Amélie Crespel; Shaun S Killen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.312

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.