Literature DB >> 29367391

Brain size affects performance in a reversal-learning test.

Séverine D Buechel1, Annika Boussard2, Alexander Kotrschal2, Wouter van der Bijl2, Niclas Kolm2.   

Abstract

It has become increasingly clear that a larger brain can confer cognitive benefits. Yet not all of the numerous aspects of cognition seem to be affected by brain size. Recent evidence suggests that some more basic forms of cognition, for instance colour vision, are not influenced by brain size. We therefore hypothesize that a larger brain is especially beneficial for distinct and gradually more complex aspects of cognition. To test this hypothesis, we assessed the performance of brain size selected female guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in two distinct aspects of cognition that differ in cognitive complexity. In a standard reversal-learning test we first investigated basic learning ability with a colour discrimination test, then reversed the reward contingency to specifically test for cognitive flexibility. We found that large-brained females outperformed small-brained females in the reversed-learning part of the test but not in the colour discrimination part of the test. Large-brained individuals are hence cognitively more flexible, which probably yields fitness benefits, as they may adapt more quickly to social and/or ecological cognitive challenges. Our results also suggest that a larger brain becomes especially advantageous with increasing cognitive complexity. These findings corroborate the significance of brain size for cognitive evolution.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Poecilia reticulata; associative learning; behavioural flexibility; brain evolution; cognition; colour discrimination

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29367391      PMCID: PMC5805926          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  49 in total

1.  Learning improves growth rate in grasshoppers.

Authors:  R Dukas; E A Bernays
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores.

Authors:  Sarah Benson-Amram; Ben Dantzer; Gregory Stricker; Eli M Swanson; Kay E Holekamp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hyperstriatal function in the pigeon: response inhibition or response shift?

Authors:  E M Macphail
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1975-08

4.  Executive system dysfunction in the aged monkey: spatial and object reversal learning.

Authors:  Z C Lai; M B Moss; R J Killiany; D L Rosene; J G Herndon
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Shoaling generates social learning of foraging information in guppies

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  The evolution of cognitive mechanisms in response to cultural innovations.

Authors:  Arnon Lotem; Joseph Y Halpern; Shimon Edelman; Oren Kolodny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The nocturnal bottleneck and the evolution of mammalian vision.

Authors:  Christopher P Heesy; Margaret I Hall
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Darren P Croft; Jens Krause; Richard James
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The advantage of objects over images in discrimination and reversal learning by kea, Nestor notabilis.

Authors:  Mark O'Hara; Ludwig Huber; Gyula Kopanny Gajdon
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Female brain size affects the assessment of male attractiveness during mate choice.

Authors:  Alberto Corral-López; Natasha I Bloch; Alexander Kotrschal; Wouter van der Bijl; Severine D Buechel; Judith E Mank; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  23 in total

1.  Intraspecific brain size variation between coexisting sunfish ecotypes.

Authors:  Caleb J Axelrod; Frédéric Laberge; Beren W Robinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Environmentally induced changes to brain morphology predict cognitive performance.

Authors:  Thomas W Pike; Michael Ramsey; Anna Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Maladaptive learning and memory in hybrids as a reproductive isolating barrier.

Authors:  Amber M Rice; Michael A McQuillan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Population densities predict forebrain size variation in the cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus.

Authors:  Zegni Triki; Elena Levorato; William McNeely; Justin Marshall; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Guppies show sex and individual differences in the ability to inhibit behaviour.

Authors:  Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato; Angelo Bisazza; Cristiano Bertolucci
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Brain morphology correlates of learning and cognitive flexibility in a fish species (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Zegni Triki; Maria Granell-Ruiz; Stephanie Fong; Mirjam Amcoff; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  Serial reversal learning in freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon motoro).

Authors:  Martha M M Daniel; Vera Schluessel
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 2.899

8.  Is foraging innovation lost following colonization of a less variable environment? A case study in surface- vs. cave-dwelling Asellus aquaticus.

Authors:  Gábor Herczeg; Viktória P Hafenscher; Gergely Balázs; Žiga Fišer; Simona Kralj-Fišer; Gergely Horváth
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Personality traits covary with individual differences in inhibitory abilities in 2 species of fish.

Authors:  Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato; Giulia Montalbano; Cristiano Bertolucci
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.624

10.  Brain size does not predict learning strategies in a serial reversal learning test.

Authors:  Annika Boussard; Séverine D Buechel; Mirjam Amcoff; Alexander Kotrschal; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.