Literature DB >> 30103620

Variability in Retronasal Odor Identification Among Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Kimia G Ganjaei1,2, Zachary M Soler1, Kristina A Storck1, Nicholas R Rowan1, Florence A Othieno1, Rodney J Schlosser1,3.   

Abstract

Background Retronasal olfaction is important in flavor detection and enjoyment. The ability to identify specific individual retronasal odors may play a role in quality of life for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Objective To identify patterns and improve understanding of retronasal identification of individual odors in CRS patients. Methods Patients diagnosed with CRS underwent retronasal and orthonasal (Sniffin' Sticks) olfactory testing and taste testing (taste strips). Retronasal identification was tested with presentation of flavored powders on the posterior tongue. Retronasal identification for individual odors was compared with results of orthonasal and taste testing. Results Seventy participants were evaluated. Retronasal identification correlated with orthonasal identification and discrimination for most individual odors. Among all patients, cinnamon and apple were identified better retronasally and banana better orthonasally ( P < .05). Anosmics identified retronasal orange, cinnamon, mushroom, coffee, smoked ham, peach, ginger, grape, and cheese more than would be expected by chance for a forced-choice paradigm with 3 distractor items ( P < .05), and this was independent of objective taste function for most odors. Conclusion Retronasal and orthonasal identification of most odors correlate in CRS patients; however, patients with anosmia can still identify certain retronasal odors more often than expected. These odors do not appear to stimulate gustatory pathways and may involve trigeminal stimulation. Understanding preserved retronasal neural stimuli may allow providers to improve eating-related quality of life in these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sniffin’ Sticks; anosmia; chronic rhinosinusitis; olfaction; orthonasal; retronasal; taste

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30103620     DOI: 10.1177/1945892418793540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy        ISSN: 1945-8932            Impact factor:   2.467


  5 in total

Review 1.  Olfaction: Sensitive indicator of inflammatory burden in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Yan; Katherine Lisa Whitcroft; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-28

2.  Validation study of a novel approach for assessment of retronasal olfactory function with combination of odor thresholds and identification.

Authors:  Ayaho Yoshino; Robert Pellegrino; Curtis R Luckett; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Clinical Implications of Psychophysical Olfactory Testing: Assessment, Diagnosis, and Treatment Outcome.

Authors:  Baihan Su; Benjamin Bleier; Yongxiang Wei; Dawei Wu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  [Olfactory and gustatory disorders].

Authors:  M M Speth; U S Speth; A R Sedaghat; T Hummel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  Beyond aroma: A scoping review on the impact of chronic rhinosinusitis on retronasal olfaction.

Authors:  Joel James; Ilan C Palte; Brandon J Vilarello; Lucas G Axiotakis; Patricia T Jacobson; David A Gudis; Jonathan B Overdevest
Journal:  Front Allergy       Date:  2022-08-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.