Literature DB >> 30102378

Mean 6-Year Follow-up of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Patients With Early Onset Scoliosis: A Glimpse of What Happens to Graduates.

Jason Pui Yin Cheung1, Karen Yiu1, Kenny Kwan1, Kenneth M C Cheung1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no agreement on frequency of distractions of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) but more frequent and smaller amounts of distractions mimic physiological spine growth. The mid- to long-term follow-up and management at skeletal maturity is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze patients with mean 6 yr of follow-up and describe the fate of MCGR graduates.
METHODS: Early onset scoliosis (EOS) patients treated with MCGRs with minimum 4 yr of follow-up and/or at graduation were studied. Parameters under study included Cobb angle, spine and instrumented lengths, and rod distraction gains. Relationship between timing of rod exchanges with changes in rate of lengthening was studied.
RESULTS: Ten EOS patients with mean 6.1 yr of follow-up were studied. The greatest Cobb angle correction occurred at the initial implantation surgery and was stable thereafter. Consistent gains in T1-12, T1-S1, and instrumented segment were observed. Rate of lengthening reduced after the first year of use but improved back to initial rates after rod exchange. Seven of the ten patients experienced complications with reoperation rate of 40% for rod distraction failure and proximal foundation problems. Only mild further improvements in all radiological parameters were observed pre- and postfinal surgery. No clinically significant curve progression was observed for rod removal only. All postfinal surgery parameters remained similar at postoperative 2 yr.
CONCLUSION: This study provides an outlook of the end of MCGR treatment. Although this is a fusionless procedure, instrumented segments do experience stiffness limiting further correction and length gain during final surgery whether fusion or rod removal is performed.
Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EOS; MCGR; Magnetically controlled growing rod; early onset scoliosis; graduate

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30102378     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  13 in total

1.  Magnetically controlled growing rods in early onset scoliosis: radiological results, outcome, and complications in a series of 22 patients.

Authors:  Peter Obid; Karen Yiu; Kenneth Cheung; Kenny Kwan; Michael Ruf; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Standard and magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Ilkka J Helenius
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

Review 3.  Understanding the implant performance of magnetically controlled growing spine rods: a review article.

Authors:  Martina Tognini; Harry Hothi; Elisabetta Dal Gal; Masood Shafafy; Colin Nnadi; Stewart Tucker; Johann Henckel; Alister Hart
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Magnetically controlled growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis: a single centre experience of 44 patients with mean follow-up of 4.1 years.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelaal; Sudarshan Munigangaiah; Jayesh Trivedi; Neil Davidson
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2020-11-02

5.  Growing rods for early-onset scoliosis in Ehlers-Danlos disease.

Authors:  Mohamed Laroussi Toumia; Ahmed Amine Mohseni; Mohamed Nabil Nessib; Rim Boussetta; Houda Yacoub-Youssef; Sami Bouchoucha
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-10-14

6.  Treatment of early onset spinal deformities with magnetically controlled growing rods: a single centre experience of 30 cases.

Authors:  D Studer; C Heidt; P Büchler; C C Hasler
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  The first magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) in the world - lessons learned and how the identified complications helped to develop the implant in the past decade: case report.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Kam Yim Sze; Kenneth Man Chee Cheung; Teng Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Mechanical wear analysis helps understand a mechanism of failure in retrieved magnetically controlled growing rods: a retrieval study.

Authors:  Jack Z Wei; Harry S Hothi; Holly Morganti; Sean Bergiers; Elisabetta Dal Gal; Doris Likcani; Johann Henckel; Alister J Hart
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  "Law of Temporary Diminishing Distraction Gains": The Phenomenon of Temporary Diminished Distraction Lengths With Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods That Is Reverted With Rod Exchange.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Cora Bow; Kenneth M C Cheung
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-17

10.  Identifying complications and failure modes of innovative growing rod configurations using the (hybrid) magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) and the spring distraction system (SDS).

Authors:  Justin V C Lemans; Casper S Tabeling; René M Castelein; Moyo C Kruyt
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.